New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[pauwelsc]

Hey JP-team

Could you please take a look at this?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

So these were all pictures I uploaded here before but which got rejected previously. I tried to update them.
More to come tonight!
Thanks a lot!

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Can I get an opinion on those?


The last one as a spotting location ofcourse

thanks!

[pauwelsc]

Last pre-screen post for today. Again thank you for investing your time in this!

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello dlowwa, what do you think of these two? Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hi again JP team, please check this set.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9585[/ATTACH]
2.Second version, improved color[ATTACH=CONFIG]9586[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9610[/ATTACH] Would this be Ramp or Terminal?

4. Also, I just got this one rejected as Overexposed. It was pre-screened and OKed here.
Original version

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6106849

Please pre-screen this new version in which I eliminated more highlights.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9612[/ATTACH]

1. color, contrast
2. color
3. (ramp) soft, vignetting
4. histogram says a bit overexposed on the original, but both look fine to me

Hi JP Team... please evaluate these shots. Thank you!
1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9587[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9588[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9589[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]9590[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]9591[/ATTACH]

1. soft
2. soft, dark/contrast
3. check horizon
4. soft, contrast, color
5. very soft, contrast

[dlowwa]

Hello. It is possible to have an evaluation?

1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9593[/ATTACH]

2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9594[/ATTACH]

I already asked advice for n.1, and tried to fix it with the suggestions received.

1. soft
2. very soft, overexposed

hello jp team please pre-screen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9595[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9597[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9598[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9599[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9611[/ATTACH]
thanks

1. overprocesed
2. overexposed
3. borderline contrast/overprocessed
4. ok
5. borderline contrast

Be careful with whatever filter you're using (shadow/highlight, clarity, etc..) it's causing the contrast to be washed out and leaving visible halos in some instances.

[dlowwa]

Hey JP-team

Could you please take a look at this?

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9605[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9606[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9607[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9608[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9609[/ATTACH]

So these were all pictures I uploaded here before but which got rejected previously. I tried to update them.
More to come tonight!
Thanks a lot!

1. right side still soft/blurry
2. ok
3. overprocessed
4. ok
5. ok

Hi guys,

Can I get an opinion on those?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9613[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9614[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9615[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9616[/ATTACH]

The last one as a spotting location ofcourse

thanks!

Borderline contrast on all of them. Looks like the light wasn't very good that day.

Hello dlowwa, what do you think of these two? Thanks!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9622[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9623[/ATTACH]

1. oversharpening/compression artifacts visible
2. dark, soft

[vcruvinel]

Hey guys!

I uploaded this shot [https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6115507] some days ago, but after doing a quickly search, I found the same helicopter in civilian and military category. The photo is in the queue and I can change some informations. Which category I have to select? Military or Civilian? I had a problem with this kind of information in another shot last week, so I need to understand how to check this field. Unfortunately the specific link to the military guide [https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php/?p=431408] is off (I got this link in the JP guidelines). So if there is another link or source of information I will appreciate!

Many thanks!

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

1. oversharpening/compression artifacts visible
2. dark, soft[/QUOTE]


Hello dlowwa, is this one better? Thanks!

[crisquijano]

Hi JP team, please check these. thank you.
1.

2.

3.
Also, is #3 considered similar to https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8614627 ?

thank you

[Degupukas]

hi jp team please prescreen


thanks a lot

[pauwelsc]

Hi! Looking forward to know your opinion on these ones...

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Thanks!

[leocb24]

Look this photos

Hello team!, take a look for this photos please! 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.


Thanks for your help!

[dlowwa]

Hey guys!

I uploaded this shot [https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6115507] some days ago, but after doing a quickly search, I found the same helicopter in civilian and military category. The photo is in the queue and I can change some informations. Which category I have to select? Military or Civilian? I had a problem with this kind of information in another shot last week, so I need to understand how to check this field. Unfortunately the specific link to the military guide [https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php/?p=431408] is off (I got this link in the JP guidelines). So if there is another link or source of information I will appreciate!

Many thanks!

Yes, it is military. Scramble.nl is usually reliable for military serials/regs.

1. oversharpening/compression artifacts visible
2. dark, soft

Hello dlowwa, is this one better? Thanks! [/QUOTE]

Soft/blurry towards the edges, sorry.

[dlowwa]

Hi JP team, please check these. thank you.
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9626[/ATTACH]

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9627[/ATTACH]

3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9633[/ATTACH]
Also, is #3 considered similar to https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8614627 ?

thank you

1. borderline soft
2. soft
3. soft, overprocessed, (not similar)

hi jp team please prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9628[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9629[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9630[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9631[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9632[/ATTACH]

thanks a lot

1. soft
2. borderline contrast
3. ok
4. borderline heat haze
5. ok