New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[LX-A343]

Opinion on these ones? Thanks a lot!!

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9930[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9931[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9932[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9933[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9934[/ATTACH]

#1 looks a bit overexposed on top of the fuselage or the transition from fuselage to tail
The others all look OK, apart from a bit of JPG compression artifacts, visible as bandings in the sky on #5 for example.

[Degupukas]

Hi jp Crew please could prescreen


thanks

[FederalAce]

Not sure about this one... Thanks!

[pauwelsc]

#1 looks a bit overexposed on top of the fuselage or the transition from fuselage to tail
The others all look OK, apart from a bit of JPG compression artifacts, visible as bandings in the sky on #5 for example.

Thanks a lot for the feedback and your time! Maybe I am going to let the number 1 fall. I will try to avoid/change the compression artefacts, especially by number 5. Nevertheless, I already saved them in the highest possible resolution.

[dlowwa]

Hi jp Crew please could prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9940[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9941[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9943[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9944[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9945[/ATTACH]

thanks

1. ok
2. dark/contrast
3. ok
4. contrast
5. soft, color, contrast

Not sure about this one... Thanks!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9946[/ATTACH]

Would be rejected for dark & cut off.

[gabrielmagacho]

N751AN: aircraft is a bit too low, the photo lacks contrast and the photo itself is slightly leaning to the right. But all this should be fairly easy to fix.
PR-GUM: slightly leaning to the right and soft
PT-TMA: not bad, maybe a bit too soft

Thank you, LX-A343 and Dlowwa for the big help!

[JesseV]

Hi,
Is this one acceptable, if so which operator should I select?

As always thanks for your help!

[pauwelsc]

Keen to know what you think of these shots!

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

[Ivan Jimenez Rojas]

Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
1 2 3 4 5

[wkd001]

Want advice for these two.
Note : First attempt of the Thomas Cook got rejected for overexposed and undersharpened. This is a re-edit. Corrected the exposure, but still got doubts about the sharpness.

[sp221156]

Is Flickr an acceptable site to upload photos for consideration?

Thanks

Steve

[dlowwa]

Hi,
Is this one acceptable, if so which operator should I select?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9950[/ATTACH]

Airport Overview - Ramp

Keen to know what you think of these shots!

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9951[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9952[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9953[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9954[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9955[/ATTACH]

1. soft/blurry
2. borderline soft
3. soft
4. ok
5. noisy

[dlowwa]

Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9956[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9957[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9958[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]9959[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]9962[/ATTACH]

1. contrast, color
2. horizon, overprocessed, maybe a bit blurry
3. ok
4. contrast, horizon
5. ok

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9960[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9961[/ATTACH]

Want advice for these two.
Note : First attempt of the Thomas Cook got rejected for overexposed and undersharpened. This is a re-edit. Corrected the exposure, but still got doubts about the sharpness.

1. ok
2. soft

[dlowwa]

Is Flickr an acceptable site to upload photos for consideration?

Thanks

Steve

You are free to upload your images wherever you please. If you mean for pre-screening, then please attach them to your post as everyone else in this thread has done.

[sp221156]

You are free to upload your images wherever you please. If you mean for pre-screening, then please attach them to your post as everyone else in this thread has done.

Thanks. I was just checking as I wasn't sure where other members load their images.

Steve