Page 4 of 107 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 2128

Thread: New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

  1. #61
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello! Are these ok for upload? Thanks!

    Attachment 6985

    Attachment 6986
    Both look somewhat overexposed, the last one also looks rather soft

  2. #62
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    São Miguel island, Azores
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Hello, these were rejected due to overexposed, unlevel and contrast issues. Are they ok now? Thanks!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5022psx1200.jpg 
Views:	58 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	6989

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5017apsx1200.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	6990

  3. #63
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    São Miguel island, Azores
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Hello, these photos were rejected due to "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing". Any help about what is wrong to the screener?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6338psx1200.jpg 
Views:	54 
Size:	607.3 KB 
ID:	6991

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2099PSX1200.jpg 
Views:	45 
Size:	599.6 KB 
ID:	6992

  4. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    São Miguel island, Azores
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Hello, this one was rejected due to horizon unlevel. Any screener can please indicate me what do you consider horizon level in this photo...Thanks

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4837psx1200.jpg 
Views:	58 
Size:	855.5 KB 
ID:	6993

  5. #65
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Are the colors ok in this one?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AIZJ.jpg 
Views:	56 
Size:	517.3 KB 
ID:	6995

  6. #66
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Hi,

    this pic was rejected due to overexposed. I´ve try to fix the problem, but I don´t know if its know okay. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A350JPtest.jpg 
Views:	77 
Size:	474.2 KB 
ID:	6997

  7. #67
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Firenze, Italy
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Hello, I had the rejection of this: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5628515

    It says it is Soft, since I often get rejected due to this what does exactly mean? And how can be solved?

    Thank you

  8. #68
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello, these were rejected due to overexposed, unlevel and contrast issues. Are they ok now? Thanks!
    Exposure and level look ok to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello, these photos were rejected due to "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing". Any help about what is wrong to the screener?
    There was a message left with at least one of those rejections (by me) indicating that there were visible editing halos. Strong halos = over processed rejection.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello, this one was rejected due to horizon unlevel. Any screener can please indicate me what do you consider horizon level in this photo...Thanks
    It needs clockwise rotation.

  9. #69
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fabinho1314 View Post
    Are the colors ok in this one?
    A little bit blue, but should be ok.

  10. #70
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by E.Funke View Post
    Hi,

    this pic was rejected due to overexposed. I´ve try to fix the problem, but I don´t know if its know okay. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A350JPtest.jpg 
Views:	77 
Size:	474.2 KB 
ID:	6997
    Not sure if more editing will help. A large portion of the frame is blown out, which is not something you can really fix.

  11. #71
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alessandros View Post
    Hello, I had the rejection of this: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5628515

    It says it is Soft, since I often get rejected due to this what does exactly mean? And how can be solved?

    Thank you
    The aircraft is soft, so you need to add more sharpening.

  12. #72
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Hi,

    I would like to upload this photo of this aircraft nose section used as a restaurant. Should I use the last registration and C/N of the aircraft as aircraft info? Should I use the Warbird/vintage category for this photo?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20161105-_MF_0518.jpg 
Views:	95 
Size:	427.6 KB 
ID:	7000

  13. #73
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjon View Post
    Should I use the last registration and C/N of the aircraft as aircraft info? Should I use the Warbird/vintage category for this photo?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20161105-_MF_0518.jpg 
Views:	95 
Size:	427.6 KB 
ID:	7000
    yes (but use private for airline) and yes

  14. #74
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Firenze, Italy
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Hi All,
    What about these two? Thanks


  15. #75
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alessandros View Post
    Hi All,
    What about these two? Thanks
    Color seems a bit oversaturated, and I would make sure the second one is level.

  16. #76
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    96

    Default

    http://i68.tinypic.com/i50u9u.jpg

    I just want to know what you're thinking

  17. #77
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    http://i68.tinypic.com/i50u9u.jpg

    I just want to know what you're thinking
    This would unfortunately be rejected for dark.

  18. #78
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    This would unfortunately be rejected for dark.
    thank you. Unfortunate end for An-12 :/

  19. #79
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    44

    Default

    hello.

    Is this ok?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-DBCC.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	655.4 KB 
ID:	7003

  20. #80
    Junior Member MSTspotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Is this one acceptable?

    Im not sure because of the front light, but its rare these days

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EP-IBK.jpg 
Views:	91 
Size:	341.8 KB 
ID:	7041

    Thanks in advance

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •