Page 6 of 107 FirstFirst ... 456781656106 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 2128

Thread: New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

  1. #101
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    44

    Default

    is it considered special scheme?

  2. #102
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fabinho1314 View Post
    is it considered special scheme?
    Yes please.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  3. #103
    Member pawelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Another attempt at the Omni T7. Is any of these any good?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N846AX_3.jpg 
Views:	75 
Size:	1,022.5 KB 
ID:	7065Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N846AX_2.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	7066

  4. #104
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dallas, USA (DFW/KDFW)
    Posts
    126

    Default

    Hi,

    Can I please get a feedback if these pics are OK for the database. First two are new edits and the third was re-processed for sharpening and exposure.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7382_WM.jpg 
Views:	85 
Size:	432.8 KB 
ID:	7067
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7388_WM.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	424.0 KB 
ID:	7068
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7542_WM.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	443.3 KB 
ID:	7069

    Regards,
    Siddarth

  5. #105
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pawelm View Post
    Another attempt at the Omni T7. Is any of these any good?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N846AX_3.jpg 
Views:	75 
Size:	1,022.5 KB 
ID:	7065Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N846AX_2.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	7066
    Both look a bit dark, and the second might need some CW rotation.

  6. #106
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Hi,

    Can I please get a feedback if these pics are OK for the database. First two are new edits and the third was re-processed for sharpening and exposure.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7382_WM.jpg 
Views:	85 
Size:	432.8 KB 
ID:	7067
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7388_WM.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	424.0 KB 
ID:	7068
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7542_WM.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	443.3 KB 
ID:	7069

    Regards,
    Siddarth
    Nose area looks blown out/overexposed, but otherwise I don't see any major issues.

  7. #107
    Member pawelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Both look a bit dark, and the second might need some CW rotation.
    Thanks dlowwa.

    And one more from me. Cluttered, or "part of the scene"?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N464MC.jpg 
Views:	64 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	7070

  8. #108
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,414

    Default

    hi,
    Cluttered unfortunately

    Regards

    Alex

  9. #109
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Hi,

    im not sure about these shots.
    #1Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9vskm.jpg 
Views:	56 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	7077
    #2Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dabdy.jpg 
Views:	48 
Size:	772.2 KB 
ID:	7078
    #3Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dabuh.jpg 
Views:	60 
Size:	686.5 KB 
ID:	7079


    Thank you very much in advance,
    Julian S.
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  10. #110
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hi,

    im not sure about these shots.
    #1Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9vskm.jpg 
Views:	56 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	7077
    #2Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dabdy.jpg 
Views:	48 
Size:	772.2 KB 
ID:	7078
    #3Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dabuh.jpg 
Views:	60 
Size:	686.5 KB 
ID:	7079


    Thank you very much in advance,
    Julian S.
    Hi,
    As they are all really classic traffic at FRA and you're a local there... I would wait for a better light opportunity for those

    Regards
    Alex

  11. #111
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Hi,
    As they are all really classic traffic at FRA and you're a local there... I would wait for a better light opportunity for those

    Regards
    Alex
    Ok, thank you, but what is with the Condor. The Janosh stickers does not exist anymore.
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  12. #112
    Junior Member saidvazquez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Mexico City
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Hello, I tried to upload this photo, yesterday was rejected 2 times the reason (soft) undersharped, once again i edited the photo, reduce the size to 900x600 an i apply soft sharp mask, Do you think it is acceptable now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_MG_1337.jpg 
Views:	54 
Size:	544.4 KB 
ID:	7080

    thanks in advance

  13. #113
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Hi, I got this rejected for "horizon unlevel", I also filled in with a comment that the photo was leveled with help of a person standing ouside the cropped frame. What would be the natural angle of the photo to get it accepted?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fojgf.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	769.5 KB 
ID:	7089

  14. #114
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saidvazquez View Post
    Hello, I tried to upload this photo, yesterday was rejected 2 times the reason (soft) undersharped, once again i edited the photo, reduce the size to 900x600 an i apply soft sharp mask, Do you think it is acceptable now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_MG_1337.jpg 
Views:	54 
Size:	544.4 KB 
ID:	7080

    thanks in advance
    Looks borderline but passable to me.

  15. #115
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjon View Post
    Hi, I got this rejected for "horizon unlevel", I also filled in with a comment that the photo was leveled with help of a person standing ouside the cropped frame. What would be the natural angle of the photo to get it accepted?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fojgf.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	769.5 KB 
ID:	7089
    Can't say for certain, but looking at the tug, I'd go with a significant amount of CW rotation to try to make the vertical lines vertical.

  16. #116
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Can't say for certain, but looking at the tug, I'd go with a significant amount of CW rotation to try to make the vertical lines vertical.
    Thank you for your opinion

    How would this photo do in screening? is the over exposed building in the background too disturbing?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170117-_MF_5186.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	670.9 KB 
ID:	7095

  17. #117
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjon View Post
    Thank you for your opinion

    How would this photo do in screening? is the over exposed building in the background too disturbing?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170117-_MF_5186.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	670.9 KB 
ID:	7095
    It would be for me, but it's possible others might disagree.

  18. #118
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Hi,

    Iam not sure about this pic. Whats your opinion? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dabbdefunke.jpg 
Views:	52 
Size:	574.4 KB 
ID:	7097

    Ciao, Eike

  19. #119
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by E.Funke View Post
    Hi,

    Iam not sure about this pic. Whats your opinion? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dabbdefunke.jpg 
Views:	52 
Size:	574.4 KB 
ID:	7097

    Ciao, Eike
    Most likely a contrast (and perhaps overexposed) rejection, sorry.

  20. #120
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Firenze, Italy
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Hello guys,
    Could these be ok?



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •