If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
and i don't know what categories wrong or missing.
thank you for your help.
Should be 'Small Prop', but unfortunately the image is quite blurry, so unless you have a different version you plan to submit, fixing the category won't make a difference in getting it accepted.
Your photo is not appearing, but in terms of liveries, small changes in liveries wouldn't be considered hot. If it is the airlines new livery or a new special livery they have, those are acceptable hots. However, if there are already photos in the database of the plane in the livery you have depicted, it is not an acceptable hot, to what I know.
Dear Friends,
I will be grateful for any help for this photo.
Especially about the contrast, it's seems to me fine, but maybe I'm wrong.
Or maybe, as another option, I have another version, please see the attached file for the second version. is it better? Does its have a better chance for the 2nd version?
I will be grateful for any help.
Erez.
I can correct the exposure, but it's a bit difficult for me to agree about the ''Horizon unlevel"... if we look at the grid I think it's leveled according to the most verticals.
Am I wrong?
I can correct the exposure, but it's a bit difficult for me to agree about the ''Horizon unlevel"... if we look at the grid I think it's leveled according to the most verticals.
Am I wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Erez.
To me it looks like it needs some good CCW rotation, but that's just me
To me it looks like it needs some good CCW rotation, but that's just me
Hi,
Thanks, but according to which objects do you determine it?
I'm really trying to understand the rules.
Maybe I do not understand them after 15 years here.
According to the rules, we have to make the level according to the vertical, right?
Are the verticals here are crooked?
I can correct the exposure, but it's a bit difficult for me to agree about the ''Horizon unlevel"... if we look at the grid I think it's leveled according to the most verticals.
Am I wrong?
And what's wrong here?
It seems to me simply excellent.
use these as guide for level, in order from most to least reliable.
1. Actual horizon
2. STRONG (i.e. taking up more than 10% of the frame) verticals in the center
3. Strong verticals towards the edges
4. STRONG horizontals (again, taking up more than 10% of the frame) in the background
5. Strong horizontals in the foreground
6. Any other vertical/horizontal references.
In your two images, the horizon is not visible, and there are no strong verticals (the buildings are far away and small to be reliable). Next would be strong horizontals, in the case of the first, the runway which, yes, indicates CCW is needed. In the second, the opposite is true, the strong horizontals suggest CW is needed. Both look like valid rejections (never mind the other rejection reasons) to me.
use these as guide for level, in order from most to least reliable.
1. Actual horizon
2. STRONG (i.e. taking up more than 10% of the frame) verticals in the center
3. Strong verticals towards the edges
4. STRONG horizontals (again, taking up more than 10% of the frame) in the background
5. Strong horizontals in the foreground
6. Any other vertical/horizontal references.
In your two images, the horizon is not visible, and there are no strong verticals (the buildings are far away and small to be reliable). Next would be strong horizontals, in the case of the first, the runway which, yes, indicates CCW is needed. In the second, the opposite is true, the strong horizontals suggest CW is needed. Both look like valid rejections (never mind the other rejection reasons) to me.
Thank you, but in the first photo from Geneva one can see the two vertical objects, Why are they not considered as objects to be leveled?
About the second photo I accept your opinion.
Thank you, but in the first photo from Geneva one can see the two vertical objects, Why are they not considered as objects to be leveled?
About the second photo I accept your opinion.
Couldn't really see them clearly in the image you posted with the grid superimposed, but here it is:
Clearly they are leaning to the right, which only reinforces what the horizontals are saying: this image needs CCW rotation. I think you understand the rules correctly, but are perhaps not seeing what the image shows properly.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment