Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ganevo View Post
    hello,
    need some help

    the first rejected.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5923206
    i tried to undersharpen,

    and i got another rejected
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5923232

    and i don't know what categories wrong or missing.

    thank you for your help.
    Seems that the original is out of focus, which unfortunately means you can not improve it by sharpening it, it stays blurry.
    About the missing category, it is a prop. Please check the upload guidelines chapter 2.2: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...oad-Guidelines
    and you might find this interesting too: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...-January-2013)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ganevo View Post
      hello,
      need some help

      the first rejected.
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5923206
      i tried to undersharpen,

      and i got another rejected
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5923232

      and i don't know what categories wrong or missing.

      thank you for your help.
      Should be 'Small Prop', but unfortunately the image is quite blurry, so unless you have a different version you plan to submit, fixing the category won't make a difference in getting it accepted.

      Comment


      • Now changes in the livery are not hot?

        I recevid this invalid hot rejection...

        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5928098
        My JetPhotos Profile

        Comment


        • Originally posted by fabinho1314 View Post
          Now changes in the livery are not hot?

          I recevid this invalid hot rejection...

          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5928098
          Your photo is not appearing, but in terms of liveries, small changes in liveries wouldn't be considered hot. If it is the airlines new livery or a new special livery they have, those are acceptable hots. However, if there are already photos in the database of the plane in the livery you have depicted, it is not an acceptable hot, to what I know.

          Comment


          • The issue was already addressed, and the photo screened, thank you.
            My JetPhotos Profile

            Comment


            • Dear Friends,
              I will be grateful for any help for this photo.
              Especially about the contrast, it's seems to me fine, but maybe I'm wrong.
              Or maybe, as another option, I have another version, please see the attached file for the second version. is it better? Does its have a better chance for the 2nd version?
              I will be grateful for any help.
              Erez.
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • The wing is still soft. Lines and edges are not sharply defined. The winglet is overexposed as well.
                If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

                Comment


                • Thanks.

                  Comment


                  • Dear friends,

                    I asking for your help with this reject.

                    I can correct the exposure, but it's a bit difficult for me to agree about the ''Horizon unlevel"... if we look at the grid I think it's leveled according to the most verticals.
                    Am I wrong?

                    Thanks in advance,
                    Erez.
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ErezS View Post
                      Dear friends,

                      I asking for your help with this reject.

                      I can correct the exposure, but it's a bit difficult for me to agree about the ''Horizon unlevel"... if we look at the grid I think it's leveled according to the most verticals.
                      Am I wrong?

                      Thanks in advance,
                      Erez.
                      To me it looks like it needs some good CCW rotation, but that's just me

                      Comment


                      • And what's wrong here?
                        It seems to me simply excellent.
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by 71sbeetle View Post
                          To me it looks like it needs some good CCW rotation, but that's just me
                          Hi,
                          Thanks, but according to which objects do you determine it?

                          I'm really trying to understand the rules.
                          Maybe I do not understand them after 15 years here.
                          According to the rules, we have to make the level according to the vertical, right?
                          Are the verticals here are crooked?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ErezS View Post
                            Dear friends,

                            I asking for your help with this reject.

                            I can correct the exposure, but it's a bit difficult for me to agree about the ''Horizon unlevel"... if we look at the grid I think it's leveled according to the most verticals.
                            Am I wrong?

                            Thanks in advance,
                            Erez.
                            Originally posted by ErezS View Post
                            And what's wrong here?
                            It seems to me simply excellent.
                            use these as guide for level, in order from most to least reliable.

                            1. Actual horizon
                            2. STRONG (i.e. taking up more than 10% of the frame) verticals in the center
                            3. Strong verticals towards the edges
                            4. STRONG horizontals (again, taking up more than 10% of the frame) in the background
                            5. Strong horizontals in the foreground
                            6. Any other vertical/horizontal references.

                            In your two images, the horizon is not visible, and there are no strong verticals (the buildings are far away and small to be reliable). Next would be strong horizontals, in the case of the first, the runway which, yes, indicates CCW is needed. In the second, the opposite is true, the strong horizontals suggest CW is needed. Both look like valid rejections (never mind the other rejection reasons) to me.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                              use these as guide for level, in order from most to least reliable.

                              1. Actual horizon
                              2. STRONG (i.e. taking up more than 10% of the frame) verticals in the center
                              3. Strong verticals towards the edges
                              4. STRONG horizontals (again, taking up more than 10% of the frame) in the background
                              5. Strong horizontals in the foreground
                              6. Any other vertical/horizontal references.

                              In your two images, the horizon is not visible, and there are no strong verticals (the buildings are far away and small to be reliable). Next would be strong horizontals, in the case of the first, the runway which, yes, indicates CCW is needed. In the second, the opposite is true, the strong horizontals suggest CW is needed. Both look like valid rejections (never mind the other rejection reasons) to me.
                              Thank you, but in the first photo from Geneva one can see the two vertical objects, Why are they not considered as objects to be leveled?
                              About the second photo I accept your opinion.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ErezS View Post
                                Thank you, but in the first photo from Geneva one can see the two vertical objects, Why are they not considered as objects to be leveled?
                                About the second photo I accept your opinion.
                                Couldn't really see them clearly in the image you posted with the grid superimposed, but here it is:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	11535_1496804505.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	662.3 KB
ID:	1015941

                                Clearly they are leaning to the right, which only reinforces what the horizontals are saying: this image needs CCW rotation. I think you understand the rules correctly, but are perhaps not seeing what the image shows properly.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X