Page 22 of 36 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 440 of 717

Thread: NEW Editing advice thread

  1. #421
    Junior Member janamparikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    CSIA, Mumbai
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Just wish to know if the below post is leveled in terms of horizon or not.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8645819

  2. #422
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Hi, I got this rejection for a soft image. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5970303
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JP287.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	969.9 KB 
ID:	8004
    Is the whole image soft or there are flaws in some parts? I appealed it and got rejected with no comment, so I came here to ask.

    Thanks.
    Newbie to JP, view my photos here:
    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=87690

  3. #423
    JetPhotos Crew B7772ADL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Surrey, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    2,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by austinshih90 View Post
    Hi, I got this rejection for a soft image. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5970303
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JP287.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	969.9 KB 
ID:	8004
    Is the whole image soft or there are flaws in some parts? I appealed it and got rejected with no comment, so I came here to ask.

    Thanks.
    It's a little soft overall but not massively. I'd try a little more USM overall.

  4. #424
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    504

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Any senior screener who is going to accept my appeal ?
    Still looking forward to a reply

  5. #425
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by janamparikh View Post
    Just wish to know if the below post is leveled in terms of horizon or not.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8645819
    The image has already been accepted. Why are you asking?

  6. #426
    Junior Member janamparikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    CSIA, Mumbai
    Posts
    25

    Default

    I have a few pictures from the same location which have been rejected due to horizon. How do we take the reference for horizon? If you see the airplanes parked in the hangar on the top left, they are drooping on the right (CW). Hence wanted to know. Thanks!

  7. #427
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by janamparikh View Post
    I have a few pictures from the same location which have been rejected due to horizon. How do we take the reference for horizon? If you see the airplanes parked in the hangar on the top left, they are drooping on the right (CW). Hence wanted to know. Thanks!
    Try to use vertical references in the center of the frame.

  8. #428
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    504

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Still looking forward to a reply
    Still waiting for a correct reply. Original post was a week ago.

  9. #429
    JetPhotos Crew B7772ADL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Surrey, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    2,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Still waiting for a correct reply. Original post was a week ago.
    From what I can see your appeal was rejected by a senior screener/appeal screener already. So you just need to re-edit. The opinion given by the other screener was just that, an opinion, it was not the final answer to your question and was not a senior screener decision. I think you migh have got confused there.
    Last edited by B7772ADL; 07-19-2017 at 06:53 PM.

  10. #430
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    EHBK
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Not sure if the horizon is correct on this one? Used the pole in the background.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DISAR.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	407.7 KB 
ID:	8013

  11. #431
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,695

    Default

    Bjorn,
    You pic was screened, rejected, your appeal was rejected that's the end of the screening process. It means a senior or an admin has already seen it. Whatever happens then in the forum is not going to reverse the screening process or that would be just like opening a Pandora box. Just reupload it with the advice given on appeal and it'll be fine.

    Cheers
    Alex

  12. #432
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Not sure if the horizon is correct on this one? Used the pole in the background.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DISAR.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	407.7 KB 
ID:	8013
    It looks unleveled but the verticals are verticals so I believe it's level.

    Regards
    Alex

  13. #433
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    EHBK
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    It looks unleveled but the verticals are verticals so I believe it's level.

    Regards
    Alex
    Thanks for your fast reply Alex! I thought exactly the same

  14. #434
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Hi,

    I have got a few rejections for over sharpening, in particular this one:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979337

    Is there a way that I can tell it is oversharpened?

    Thanks

  15. #435
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bluepanda7 View Post
    Hi,

    I have got a few rejections for over sharpening, in particular this one:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979337

    Is there a way that I can tell it is oversharpened?

    Thanks
    There are jaggies visible pretty much everywhere there is a hard transition - titles, colour transitions on the paint, leading edges, gear, etc..

  16. #436
    Member pawelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Hi guys,

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5980665
    I got this one rejected for bad genre. Unfortunatley I don't remeber which one was selected (I think I selected "civilian" because it has civilian reg, and according to guidelines aircraft operated by government are considered civilian), can you please check it up? And which genre should be selected?

    thanks

  17. #437
    Senior Member pilotgolfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Grand Forks, ND
    Posts
    1,805

    Default

    Howdy there!
    I've had a few rejections for various reasons recently and wondering about them.

    For this one, is there anything else besides the noise issue?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5978213

    I can see the dust after it got rejected. I'm not sure why I missed it before. That and I obviously missed the cargo category (or was it special scheme for the 25?). It was pretty cool to see, though!
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5984134

    For this one I wanted to include the 748 to balance the picture out a little bit. Is the MD-80 too high here?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988698

    Finally, we were delayed a couple hours, so we didn't take off until after sunset and this was the view as it was. For the scene I wanted to capture, is it too dark for here? I also see the window frame in the bottom corners when it's equalized now. Also, was the dark sky in the corners contribute to the vignetting reason? I was using my 10-18 wide angle and that's as far as the light went in the sky. Is there any way I can rework it for here or is it for personal?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988726

    Besides those reasons, is there anything else to spruce these pictures up to database standards?

    I appreciate it and thanks a bunch!

  18. #438
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,695

    Default

    Hi Ryan,
    First one : big noise issue indeed but also could have been rejected for cut off as it's not really a tail shot but more an angle and a cropping that only shows the back part of a plane , there's too much fuselage for a tail shot

    2nd, missed cargo indeed

    3rd, composition works for me but the screener should have selected dark and over sharpening. Needs a complete re-edit imo

    4th, unfortunnaly it's really blurry, even the wing, and I doubt it has any chance.

    regards

  19. #439
    Senior Member pilotgolfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Grand Forks, ND
    Posts
    1,805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Hi Ryan,
    First one : big noise issue indeed but also could have been rejected for cut off as it's not really a tail shot but more an angle and a cropping that only shows the back part of a plane , there's too much fuselage for a tail shot

    2nd, missed cargo indeed

    3rd, composition works for me but the screener should have selected dark and over sharpening. Needs a complete re-edit imo

    4th, unfortunnaly it's really blurry, even the wing, and I doubt it has any chance.

    regards
    Awesome, thank you. I'll give the second and third ones another go and shelve the other two.

  20. #440
    Junior Member JetSetGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Hi Admins,
    Just Checking if any of these could be appealed?
    I have begun to get overwhelmed now looking at the count of rejections I have received lately, and I have a feeling I need to revisit the Kindergarten school for editing.

    I was browsing the link at the upload page and was hoping to see if the acceptance parameters have recently changed, the below link seems to be broken.
    http://forums.jetphotos.com/showthre...oad-Guidelines

    Here are a few reject links which I thought did not have any defect/perhaps acceptable, and I would love to get constructive feedback on bettering the submission.

    1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989639 (rejected for dark/underexposed & contrast)

    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989625 (rejected for dark/underexposed, contrast & backlit, I thought the tail was not casting any shadow?)

    3. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989326 (the Horizon seems ok to me looking at the vertical lines from the terminal)

    4. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988077 ( Some more information on bad color reject would be appreciated)

    5. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988067 ( I am not sure about any window dirt since it was a brand new aircraft with no smudges/dirt, perhaps I am unable to see any glare)

    6. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5986976

    7. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979571 (Any particular area which has remained soft which can be taken care in the fresh edit)

    Many thanks in advance for your time,

    Cheers!

    Girish

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •