Page 97 of 98 FirstFirst ... 478795969798 LastLast
Results 1,921 to 1,940 of 1948

Thread: NEW Editing advice thread

  1. #1921
    Junior Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    61

    Default Sharp

    Hi,

    Are these two sharp enought?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-HOO_2.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	350.4 KB 
ID:	7939
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N10SL_2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	334.4 KB 
ID:	7940

    Thanks
    Marian

  2. #1922
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    Are these two sharp enought?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-HOO_2.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	350.4 KB 
ID:	7939
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N10SL_2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	334.4 KB 
ID:	7940

    Thanks
    Marian
    First is a bit soft; the second is passable for me.

  3. #1923
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Hard to tell at that size, but doesn't look too bad to me.

  4. #1924
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Hard to tell at that size, but doesn't look too bad to me.
    Sorry that I keep asking you questions, but is it appeal worthy?

  5. #1925
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Sorry that I keep asking you questions, but is it appeal worthy?
    That's up to you, but I could see it going either way, so no guarantee if you did.

  6. #1926
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dallas, USA (DFW/KDFW)
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Hi,

    Can I please get some help with the following rejects:

    1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5944191 - The ATC tower behind the tail was used as ref to level the shot. No details are blown out due to over exposure. Any lesser and I am afraid it will be rejected as 'Under Exposed' considering the evening light.

    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5945550 - I am checking the CN info in another thread, but I felt the 'Foreground clutter' rejection was a bit harsh considering that it is a museum and its only a rope over wheel and perimeter pole over small part of landing arrester.

    Regards,
    Siddarth

  7. #1927
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Hi,

    Can I please get some help with the following rejects:

    1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5944191 - The ATC tower behind the tail was used as ref to level the shot. No details are blown out due to over exposure. Any lesser and I am afraid it will be rejected as 'Under Exposed' considering the evening light.
    All verticals leaning left = needs CW rotation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post

    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5945550 - I am checking the CN info in another thread, but I felt the 'Foreground clutter' rejection was a bit harsh considering that it is a museum and its only a rope over wheel and perimeter pole over small part of landing arrester.

    Regards,
    Siddarth
    General rule for clutter on preserved aircraft is if it's avoidable from another angle, then yes, obstruction. If there is no way to avoid it from any angle, then not obstruction. Can't really tell in your image which case would apply.

  8. #1928
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Hi,

    Got this picture rejected for horizon unlevel :

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5963919

    Before appealing i was checking almost every vertical line in the building behind this aircraft and saw straight lines. So to me no horizon unlevel just a acceptable picture and no reason for rejecting. So i decided to appeal.

    Unfortunately my appeal got rejected with the following message : Leaning a touch to the right on the centre verticals. Sorry guys but that's probably less then 0,1ccw and such a small correction that to me it still is an acceptable picture.

    Bjorn

  9. #1929
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Hi,

    Got this picture rejected for horizon unlevel :

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5963919

    Before appealing i was checking almost every vertical line in the building behind this aircraft and saw straight lines. So to me no horizon unlevel just a acceptable picture and no reason for rejecting. So i decided to appeal.

    Unfortunately my appeal got rejected with the following message : Leaning a touch to the right on the centre verticals. Sorry guys but that's probably less then 0,1ccw and such a small correction that to me it still is an acceptable picture.

    Bjorn
    For me there are not enough dependable references in the image to say it is definitely unlevel, so I can't say you're wrong. Giving the photographer the benefit of the doubt is my philosophy in these situations

  10. #1930
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    For me there are not enough dependable references in the image to say it is definitely unlevel, so I can't say you're wrong. Giving the photographer the benefit of the doubt is my philosophy in these situations
    Thank you would appreciate it if that can be done.

  11. #1931
    Member ErezS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Ra'anana, Israel
    Posts
    426

    Default Too much or too little contrast


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5965368
    I'll appreciate any suggestion to improve the situation.

    PS: By the way, may you split this reason to two different reasons?

  12. #1932
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Thank you would appreciate it if that can be done.
    Any senior screener who is going to accept my appeal ?

  13. #1933
    Junior Member janamparikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    CSIA, Mumbai
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Just wish to know if the below post is leveled in terms of horizon or not.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8645819

  14. #1934
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Hi, I got this rejection for a soft image. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5970303
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JP287.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	969.9 KB 
ID:	8004
    Is the whole image soft or there are flaws in some parts? I appealed it and got rejected with no comment, so I came here to ask.

    Thanks.
    Newbie to JP, view my photos here:
    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=87690

  15. #1935
    JetPhotos Crew B7772ADL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Surrey, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    2,809

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by austinshih90 View Post
    Hi, I got this rejection for a soft image. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5970303
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JP287.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	969.9 KB 
ID:	8004
    Is the whole image soft or there are flaws in some parts? I appealed it and got rejected with no comment, so I came here to ask.

    Thanks.
    It's a little soft overall but not massively. I'd try a little more USM overall.

  16. #1936
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Any senior screener who is going to accept my appeal ?
    Still looking forward to a reply

  17. #1937
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by janamparikh View Post
    Just wish to know if the below post is leveled in terms of horizon or not.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8645819
    The image has already been accepted. Why are you asking?

  18. #1938
    Junior Member janamparikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    CSIA, Mumbai
    Posts
    24

    Default

    I have a few pictures from the same location which have been rejected due to horizon. How do we take the reference for horizon? If you see the airplanes parked in the hangar on the top left, they are drooping on the right (CW). Hence wanted to know. Thanks!

  19. #1939
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by janamparikh View Post
    I have a few pictures from the same location which have been rejected due to horizon. How do we take the reference for horizon? If you see the airplanes parked in the hangar on the top left, they are drooping on the right (CW). Hence wanted to know. Thanks!
    Try to use vertical references in the center of the frame.

  20. #1940
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Still looking forward to a reply
    Still waiting for a correct reply. Original post was a week ago.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •