Page 27 of 37 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast
Results 521 to 540 of 723

Thread: NEW Editing advice thread

  1. #521
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Bogota - SKBO
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Hello guys, It's my first time posting in the forum and I would like to get some help with 2 photos I just got rejected.

    - This was like my 3rd attempt with this pic but it always get rejected over contrast issues, I don't know whether decrease or increase contrast.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6044064

    - About this one I would like to know if it's fixable, I know the weather was very bad that day but i'm affraid I don't have another pic of those F-16
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6044313

    Thanks a lot for your help.

  2. #522
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Thoughts please? Thanks for the help
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1020 (2).JPG 
Views:	53 
Size:	130.3 KB 
ID:	8498
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1021 (2).JPG 
Views:	25 
Size:	150.5 KB 
ID:	8497

  3. #523
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwikieran View Post
    Thoughts please? Thanks for the help
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1020 (2).JPG 
Views:	53 
Size:	130.3 KB 
ID:	8498
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1021 (2).JPG 
Views:	25 
Size:	150.5 KB 
ID:	8497
    Great shots! The only thing I would suggest is increasing the contrast on both photos

  4. #524
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Aviation Photos View Post
    Great shots! The only thing I would suggest is increasing the contrast on both photos
    Thanks Nick will do!

  5. #525
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    EHBK
    Posts
    79

    Default

    Hi,
    As this was previous rejected, I would like to know if its better now.
    Rejected one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6045410
    New one:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ER-AXL-2.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	407.3 KB 
ID:	8502
    Thanks in advance!

  6. #526
    Member hongmng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    East Greenbush, NY, USA
    Posts
    285

    Default

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6066446

    Is this rightly rejected? It seems to be normally sharpened and spaced as my usual shots from this angle.

  7. #527
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andjeom View Post
    Hello guys, It's my first time posting in the forum and I would like to get some help with 2 photos I just got rejected.

    - This was like my 3rd attempt with this pic but it always get rejected over contrast issues, I don't know whether decrease or increase contrast.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6044064

    - About this one I would like to know if it's fixable, I know the weather was very bad that day but i'm affraid I don't have another pic of those F-16
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6044313

    Thanks a lot for your help.
    Overall poor light on both. Second might be salvageable with a bit more contrast and brightened. First not sure there is much you can do to improve it.

    Quote Originally Posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Hi,
    As this was previous rejected, I would like to know if its better now.
    Rejected one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6045410
    New one:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ER-AXL-2.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	407.3 KB 
ID:	8502
    Thanks in advance!
    Don't see much difference between the two, but I suppose the second one looks passable to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by hongmng View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6066446

    Is this rightly rejected? It seems to be normally sharpened and spaced as my usual shots from this angle.
    Could use a tighter a crop, and there are definite jaggies visible along the wings and edges of the fuselage.

  8. #528
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Hi,

    is the amount of backlit too hight to get this photo accepted?

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EW-253PA.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	643.0 KB 
ID:	8543

  9. #529
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    is the amount of backlit too hight to get this photo accepted?

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EW-253PA.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	643.0 KB 
ID:	8543
    Backlighting should not be an issue for this photo.

  10. #530
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Bogota - SKBO
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Overall poor light on both. Second might be salvageable with a bit more contrast and brightened. First not sure there is much you can do to improve it.
    Thank you very much

  11. #531
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Hey,

    today this picture get rejected due to horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6048842
    Iīve appealed that because i was to 100% sure that itīs leveled. As reference point i used the white rwy line under the watermark because the buildings in the background are washed out due to the engine heat.
    The appeal gets rejected: all buildings are "slightly leaning left".
    In my opinion itīs less than slightly but i canīt recheck the horizon - when i click on "horizon" in screening tools there is a pop up which means that my password is incorrect, i entered it again but nothing.

    I hope you can help me.
    Thanks a lot for your time and help in advance, have a nice day!!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  12. #532
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Munich Germany
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Can someone tell me whats the problem with the contrast here?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6049873

  13. #533
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey,

    today this picture get rejected due to horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6048842
    Iīve appealed that because i was to 100% sure that itīs leveled. As reference point i used the white rwy line under the watermark because the buildings in the background are washed out due to the engine heat.
    The appeal gets rejected: all buildings are "slightly leaning left".
    In my opinion itīs less than slightly but i canīt recheck the horizon - when i click on "horizon" in screening tools there is a pop up which means that my password is incorrect, i entered it again but nothing.

    I hope you can help me.
    Thanks a lot for your time and help in advance, have a nice day!!
    I'm biased, because I'm one of the (two) screeners who rejected it, but the verticals are leaning left for me. The treeline in the background also confirms this as it is much higher in the right half of the frame.

    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    Can someone tell me whats the problem with the contrast here?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6049873
    The light looks a bit harsh and washed out. Horizon might also be a little off.

  14. #534
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Thanks a lot! I'll edit it and upload it again.
    Have a nice day.
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  15. #535
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Any thoughts? Could this photo get accepted? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	VH-SBG (2).jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	280.7 KB 
ID:	8564

  16. #536
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Aviation Photos View Post
    Any thoughts? Could this photo get accepted? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	VH-SBG (2).jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	280.7 KB 
ID:	8564
    I'd personally crop a bit off the bottom, but it's probably ok as it is.

  17. #537
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    I'd personally crop a bit off the bottom, but it's probably ok as it is.
    Ok thanks

  18. #538
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Minneapolis,USA
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Dear Team,

    Can you please help me to identify the rejections reasons in the photo so that i can improve on them and re-submit it.

    Rejected for 1. Unsharpened (soft) 2. Vignetting not allowed (i did not use a lens hood while taking the shot)


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6050571

    Thanks for your time.

    Thanks
    Ninad

  19. #539
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ninadranade View Post
    Dear Team,

    Can you please help me to identify the rejections reasons in the photo so that i can improve on them and re-submit it.

    Rejected for 1. Unsharpened (soft) 2. Vignetting not allowed (i did not use a lens hood while taking the shot)


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6050571

    Thanks for your time.

    Thanks
    Ninad
    It looks soft, maybe even a bit blurry towards the nose. Vignetting can be avoided using a smaller aperture, f/8 for example.

  20. #540
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Minneapolis,USA
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    It looks soft, maybe even a bit blurry towards the nose. Vignetting can be avoided using a smaller aperture, f/8 for example.
    Thanks for the feedback !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •