Hello,
I know screening is volunteer and there is a human element to screening that will make it always a very inconsistent process.
However, there needs to be something done on this site about inconsistency.
For instance this was rejected for soft: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued...al-large-photo I appealed the photo and got told that it is a "bit" soft. Which is extremely critical as the sharpness is within the site's acceptable limits.
Yet then we see additions like this. And this is not to single out a photographer, rather to point out discrepancy in screening:
Loose crop: xxx
Blurry: xxx
Centering with a color cast: xxx
Centering: xxx
So why am I being hit with way more critical screening?
I know screening is volunteer and there is a human element to screening that will make it always a very inconsistent process.
However, there needs to be something done on this site about inconsistency.
For instance this was rejected for soft: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued...al-large-photo I appealed the photo and got told that it is a "bit" soft. Which is extremely critical as the sharpness is within the site's acceptable limits.
Yet then we see additions like this. And this is not to single out a photographer, rather to point out discrepancy in screening:
Loose crop: xxx
Blurry: xxx
Centering with a color cast: xxx
Centering: xxx
So why am I being hit with way more critical screening?
Comment