Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Different Screeners?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Different Screeners?

    Hi guys , i just tried to post a MIL MI-171SH-P that belong to the Peruvian Army.
    The first time that i uploaded it i got 2 reasons for rejection.
    1.-https://gyazo.com/2ec37746d514e313df419d394d745d1d

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Then i try to upload it again (i have already decrease the contrast)
    2.-https://gyazo.com/d615de2901007975fcc20e6b06e3d443

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I try again and i get the same reason for rejection (location) I didnt know that i had to specificate the location when i make use of the -other location- option.

    I send it again with the exact location... and i got more than 4 rejections that i didn't got in the past times that i have sent THE SAME picture...

    4.-https://gyazo.com/a6ad1c1472e241d1bf2c9c60450ffc0e

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Any suggestions? Cheers!

  • #2
    I just noticed that i was uploading a similar photo but with different editing.

    Comment


    • #3
      Screeners are no robots. They are humans like you and me. So, different screening results and slightly varying acceptance requirements are absolutely normal.

      Btw.: I would drop the image. The screening result of the last screener is pretty much what I would have thought.

      Comment


      • #4
        Miguel

        As Peter says, all the screeners are different and will have differing opinions. Although, I must say that where possible, we will try and reject an image with all the reasons that could cause a rejection the first time round. Sorry this didn't happen this time. Although I do agree with the rejection reasons given on the final rejection you shared.

        The Contrast is very harsh with a bright sky in the background and a dark aeroplane, you need to make the scene consistent. Cutoff, you have cut the top of Rotor head which in my opinion could've been avoided. Finally the color rejection I would say is a touch harsh but try and reduce the amount of saturation you apply to the image. If you want to upload a new edit to Gyazo and let us take a look before you upload I'd be happy to.

        Hope this helps.
        Best regards,
        Dave

        Saving the World, One Screened Image at a time...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by davepotter View Post
          Miguel

          As Peter says, all the screeners are different and will have differing opinions. Although, I must say that where possible, we will try and reject an image with all the reasons that could cause a rejection the first time round. Sorry this didn't happen this time. Although I do agree with the rejection reasons given on the final rejection you shared.

          The Contrast is very harsh with a bright sky in the background and a dark aeroplane, you need to make the scene consistent. Cutoff, you have cut the top of Rotor head which in my opinion could've been avoided. Finally the color rejection I would say is a touch harsh but try and reduce the amount of saturation you apply to the image. If you want to upload a new edit to Gyazo and let us take a look before you upload I'd be happy to.

          Hope this helps.
          Thank you for answering my question. I fixed the contrast problem and finally my photo got accepted.
          Peruvian Army MI171-SH-P getting ready to practice SPIE operation for the main day at SITDEF 2017!. EP-687. Mil Mi-171Sh-P. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by miguelhc25 View Post
            and finally my photo got accepted.
            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8591255
            ...with a cut off rotor.

            Anyway. Congrats!

            Comment

            Working...
            X