Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 155

Thread: UPLOAD GUIDELINES - New version

  1. #1
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default UPLOAD GUIDELINES - New version

    Hello all,
    Please see the new version of the upload guidelines. We recommend everyone to carefully read it, even if you're familiar with the previous version.
    The main differences are the definition of small prop aircraft, a note about bad weather photos and a slight change in the way we treat similar photos.
    Feel free to post questions or suggestions.

    Please see new corrected upload guidelines.


    1 General Upload guideline


    Please keep in mind that rarity of a photo will be taken into account by our screening team.


    1.1 General Advice on uploads


    1.1.1 Upload only unaltered images


    Cloning anything in or out of a photo will mean that the photo will be rejected and you are running the risk of your upload privileges being withdrawn or limited for some time. Manipulating a photo is something we will never tolerate. We reserve ourselves the right to remove manipulated photos from the database. All that we allow to be cloned out are artefacts in the picture that look like sensor dust spots.


    Any manipulation of a photo will not be tolerated and might result in a ban if repeated.


    1.1.2 Uploading scans


    For such shots lower standards are applied. If it is necessary to clone out damage to the photo, please leave a remark in the comments to the screeners field. Guidelines for composition or obstruction do not apply to rare old scans.


    1.2 Informations


    1.2.1 Auto Fill


    On most occasions the Auto Fill will provide the all needed information including the CN for you, so please use this first.


    Note: Please, check the info fields given by the auto fill. It is up to the photographer to provide correct information.


    Privately owned aircraft should be uploaded with "Private" as airline. The option "Unknown" should only be used, if there is no way to find out the correct airline.




    1.2.2 Airport Codes


    You will need to enter the relevant 4 letter (ICAO) airport code in the box provided.


    When uploading airport overviews the 4 letter code is to be entered in both the registration & airport code fields.


    If the airport you need is not in the menu, or auto fill, please complete this form to request it to be added.


    If the location is not an airport, you may use the Other Location option


    If you are not allowed to give full details for the location (for example for sensitive military airports) you have to use the "other location" feature as follows: Other Location - Undisclosed

    Please do not use special characters like " & % $ “ ` and similar.


    1.2.3 Airport Overviews


    For airport photos of Control Towers, Terminals, etc., type in the airport 4 letter (ICAO) code in both the Registration and Airport fields.


    For "Spotting Location" in addition to the correct info, please note, that we have also minimum requirements regarding the motive, as explained in Chapter 3.4.2.


    Note: an airport overview taken from inside an aircraft, with part of the wing visible should be uploaded as wing view (see 1.1.4.).




    1.2.4 Registration & Construction numbers (CN)


    Please try to include the registration and construction number (CN). If the CN has not been added automatically by using Auto Fill, it is normally quite easy to find it. First step would be to check the database for photos that are already added.






    For a group of aircraft flying in formation it is preferred that the registration of the lead aircraft is entered.


    In case you the registration is unknown leave the field blank.


    When uploading a wing view, submit the info of the aircraft the image is taken from, if a part of this aircraft is visible (for example the wing).


    1.2.5 Genre


    Auto Fill should select the correct genre automatically on most occasions. The Genre is based on the current registration worn by the aircraft.


    Aircraft operated by government and police are considered 'Civilian'.


    Privately owned warbirds (military aircraft) with a civil registration should be submitted as 'Civilian' with the Warbird/Vintage category selected.




    1.2.6 Uploading Wing Views


    Photos taken airborne need the country and 'Inflight' as location, unless an airport is visible.


    International Airspace only applies for shots taken mid-ocean where you do not know whose territory you are flying over. Shots taken over land or within a nation's airspace should always include the correct country.


    1.2.7 Detailed guideline for information


    A detailed guide for civilian airlines can be found here


    A detailed guide for military airlines can be found here




    1.2.8 Long exposure night shots


    Night shots showing only the trails of the lights of an aircraft should be submitted as airport overview and with "Airport Overview" and "Night Shot" categories selected.






    1.2.9 Date


    For photos taken with with a digital camera the exact date is expected to be given. Not submitting the exact date (Month/Day/Year) can lead to a rejection of the photo. Changing of the date is seen as a manipulation of the image.


    Providing a less specific date (Month/Year), will be accepted in some cases. For example when a photo has been taken on a photography sensitive location. In such a case, the photographer is expected to provide the reason for not submitting the exact date, in the Comments to Screeners field.


    1.3 Image Formats


    Photos can be uploaded with an aspect ratio between 4:3 and 3:2, or at an aspect ratio of 16:9.


    1.4 Appealing a rejection


    Our photo screeners are human, and we understand that you may sometimes disagree with their decision to reject a photo. As a result, we have instituted an Appeal process, which will allow you, as a photographer, to have your photo reviewed by a member of the JetPhotos senior screening team for a final decision.


    To appeal the rejection of this photo, please enter a short, concise reason you feel this photo was wrongly rejected, and press the 'Submit Appeal' button. You will receive e-mail notification when your appeal has been decided.


    Offending appeal remarks will cause an immediate rejection of the appeal and can also result in a ban.


    NOTE: Do not misuse the appeal feature to ask for advice on how to correct a photo. For such purposes please use the aviation photography forums.


    2 Rejection reasons explained - Various


    2.1 Bad Info


    Uploads with wrong information, which could have been easy to find using the mentioned methods above will be instantly rejected for "bad info". A guide to enter the correct information can be found in the "General Upload Guideline".


    The Remarks field is be used to add informative notes or comments regarding the image displayed. Inappropriate comments may be subject to change or deletion. Insulting comments in the remark field can result in ban.




    2.2 Categories


    Air to Air
    Air-to-Air is to be selected when uploading a photo that has been taken from inside one airborne aircraft and that is showing another airborne aircraft.


    Night Shots
    This category should apply for photos taken at dawn, dusk and night. For Dusk and Dawn photos these should show a red-orange glow and long shadows. Dusk or dawn shots where the aircraft is a silhouette in front of a rising or setting sun would be a time where backlit photos are acceptable and Night Shot would apply.


    Accidents
    Accident is to be selected when showing an aircraft that had an accident and you are showing the damage of that accident, or if showing an actual accident or incident. It is not to be used, when an aircraft has had an accident and you are uploading a photo of that aircraft taken prior to the incident, or after the accident, when it's being repaired.


    Airport Overview
    Is to be selected when showing buildings of an airport or uploading an airport overview.


    Cabin Shot
    Cabin Shot is to be selected when showing the interior of an aircraft, not the cockpit.




    Flight Deck
    Is to be selected when showing the inside of the cockpit of an aircraft.


    Wing View
    Wing View has to be selected when uploading a photo that has been taken from inside an aircraft, typical through a cabin window of an airliner. To be accepted it has too show large parts of the engine and / or the wing. A wing view showing no part of the aircraft is not acceptable.


    Business Jet
    A photo of a Business Jet is to be uploaded as such. This category is for the Cessna Citation or a Boeing BBJ and everything similar. Some military and government aircraft also fall into this category. Anything with props is not a business jet.


    Cargo
    This is to be selected for Cargo aircraft. It is also to be selected for military cargo aircraft except tankers and water bombers.


    Helicopter
    To be used for helicopters. Tiltrotors and gyrocopters are considered helicopters. The V-22 Osprey falls under the Helicopter category.


    Lighter-Than-Air
    To be used for hot air balloons or blimps. Gliders do not fall into this category.


    Small Prop
    To be used for small props which have been designed for up to 10 passengers.


    Special Scheme
    a) Military Aircraft The "Special Scheme" category should usually not be used for a special sticker or marking on military planes. This means kill markings (like flags on the intakes) or slightly enlarged unit badges on the wing, these do not count as a special scheme.


    Flight demonstration teams like the Red Arrows, USAF Thunderbirds etc. should NOT be selected as special scheme, as these are the standard paint scheme within the units.


    However, planes with large special tail markings that are unique within the fleet should be selected. For example the Boss Birds with full colour markings within USN squadrons, or British unit celebration tails. Or the German "Monster" Tornado...


    b) Civil Aircraft
    Special scheme should only be checked for aircraft whose livery differs extensively from the standard fleet colour scheme. Typical examples are “Star Wars", "Hibiscus" or Retro Jets. Aircraft with large stickers to celebrate the 100th or 500th plane delivered, also count. Same with advertising stickers if large or advertising schemes, these do qualify for Special Scheme selection.


    Hybrids or plain white aircraft do not count as Special Scheme.


    Warbird / Vintage
    This category is to be selected for old planes (anything that was not built after 1970, or where the production started before 1970), planes that are no longer in regular service and planes in museums. Also, replicas of vintage aircraft need the "vintage" category.



    2.3 Double


    This will occur if you upload the same picture twice.




    2.4 File Error


    An error occurred during the upload phase of your photo, which deems the photo unreadable. Please resubmit the photo again.




    2.5 Hot Photo


    The following will be accepted as hot for 48 hours after the first photo got accepted:


    1. New aircraft type produced by a manufacturer. (including subtypes)
    2. New aircraft type / subtype for an airline or air force. (including roll-outs or test flights at the factory)
    3. First appearance of a new airline colour scheme. (incl. for all subtypes)
    4. First appearance of a special scheme for an airline or air force. Air force special scheme must be at least a full tail marking or similar size on the fuselage. (also for subtypes). Airline special scheme includes all alliance schemes such as Star Alliance, One World etc.
    5. Other Newsworthy events at the discretion of the screening team. (typical hand over ceremonies, promotion tours by new airliner types,..)
    6. photos of airliners with a registration not in the database will count as hot. (the 48h hours guideline will not apply to those)
    7. Please note that new routes are not considered as hot.




    Hot photos for which the 48 hour guideline does not apply


    In order to improve the cooperation with FlightRadar24 and have the most up to date photo available for the FlightRadar24 site the following will be accepted as hot for the first photo accepted only.


    1. A new delivery of an aircraft type that already exists in the fleet.
    2. An existing aircraft in the fleet that is repainted in a new colour scheme.
    3. Any change to the colour scheme (for example: removal of a special scheme, new stickers) or to the aircraft itself (Winglets, Sharklets) - Note that this is only valid for active aircraft
    4. Photo of an airliner with a registration not in the database or re-use of a registration for a new airframe


    Remember, these are hot only for the first accepted image.




    2.6 Similar


    Means that you have a similar photo already in the database. Please upload only your best photos, try to be creative. Similar refers to:
    - a photo taken from the same sequence the same day e. landing, taxiing, ramp parking or take off
    or
    - same registration, similar angle or composition or same background taken on different dates.
    - Close up views and full or partial views of an a/c taken at the same angle, are generally considered similar.

    If a new upload is of a significantly better quality, we may consider accepting it.

    We will only accept a certain number of cockpit or window shots taken in the same aircraft (normally no more than two).


    3 Rejection reasons explained - Composition


    3.1 Composition/Centering


    The composition of the photo is not visually appealing. This can be for example: bad centering of the aircraft or that the angle that you have used does not show the aircraft in a very good light. 'Rear end' shots are particularly vulnerable to getting this rejection reason as are shots taken directly underneath an aircraft or just a little off the runway centerline on final approach. If a shot shows a clear motivation then we are obviously prepared to be flexible, such situations might include a smoky touchdown or a strong crosswind approach, an aircraft placed off center on purpose to include a distinctive background or to enhance the expression of a photo.


    Centering/framing in photography is not a mathematical issue. For example: an Airbus A340-600 side-on photo can not be centered the same way as a 3/4 shot of a Hercules. The photo has to look balanced. A good indicator for side-on shots is to center the area between wings and window line. If an aircraft is just about to touch down, centering the area covered by the aircraft and runway might also work.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/001...ion-Center.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/002-Composition-x.jpg






    3.2 Cut Off


    In many cases cropping out parts of the aircraft improves the photo.


    If something has been cut off without a clear motive for doing so it will most likely be rejected. Generally speaking, do not crop through essential parts of the main subject. As a rule of thumb if you want to show a close up of an aircraft, show only the main subject. For example: a photo showing almost the whole aircraft, but with the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected. A photo with a part of the aircraft, such as an engine cut off will also lead to a rejection in the majority of cases.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/003-Cut-off.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/004-cutoff-y.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/005-Cropping-x.jpg




    3.3 Horizon


    One of the most common rejection reasons, it means the photo is not level. To ensure your photo is level use a vertical reference point such as a building to straighten things out. All shots should be level, this includes window views where the horizon or building verticals are visible and cabin/flight deck shots. For wide angle shots, try to center a vertical line in the middle of the photo.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/006-horizon.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/007-horizon.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/008-Horizon.jpg




    3.4 Motive


    3.4.1 General


    Means we are not sure what you are trying to show us with your photo, what is the motive for the shot? It can also mean that your picture is not sufficiently aviation related for us to accept.


    Window view shots must either be an overview of an airport or have a significant amount of the aircraft in view and be visually appealing, a wingtip plus a few clouds is not what we are looking for here.


    Be careful with airport views too. For example, an overview of the front of an airport is usually acceptable but a photo of some random people in coffee bars is not.


    When people are recognizable in a photo, it may lead to a motive rejection.


    3.4.2 Spotting location


    For spotting locations, the following minimum requirements apply:
    ◦ photo must show a public location regularly used for spotting
    ◦ photo needs to cover a wider view of the area
    ◦ the airport area should be in view
    ◦ at least one aircraft should be in view
    ◦ little description of the spotting location in the remarks field is mandatory, mainly the name under which the location is known, what can be seen from here (e.g. which runway, morning/afternoon light, ...)


    Optional but recommended as the best way to pinpoint a spot...
    ◦ Google Earth co-ordinates in this format after you remarks:
    ◦ < br >< b >[Google Earth xx°xx'xx.xx"N/S xx°xx'xx.xx"E/W]< /b > (remove the spaces between the < and >)




    3.4.3 Motive


    Jetphotos.com is primarily an aviation database. With this in mind an aircraft or a primarily aviation based subject should form the greatest part of the image. Concentration on subjects such as posed groups of people, female anatomy on a beach such as recent uploads from St Maarten or any other place, will be rejected on the grounds of Motive.


    For privacy reasons the following situations can lead to a motive rejection
    - The photo exposes an easily identifiable person, including air crew in a cockpit etc, who are not clearly posing.
    • The photo exposes a readable vehicle license plate. Blurring the plate to a minimum which makes the plate unreadable is accepted.




    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/009-motive.jpg




    3.5 Obstruction/Clutter


    This means that the aircraft is not fully visible due to it being obstructed by anything from long grass to catering trucks.
    Items of ramp equipment must not obscure any of the aircraft, including stairs, aerobridges etc. Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/010-obstr.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/011-Obstruction-u.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/012-obstruction.jpg






    3.6 Too Far


    Simply means that the subject is too far away and there is too much dead space in the photo. You may be able to rescue the situation by cropping closer to subject but this will result in a loss of quality.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/012-Toofar.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/013-Toofar-uz.jpg






    4 Rejection reasons explained - Photo Quality


    4.1 Bad Quality


    A bad quality rejection means that the picture has many problems and is not worth considering further editing, appealing or re-uploading.




    4.2 Blurry


    Simple - we don't accept blurry pictures, it is impossible to define what level of blurriness causes a rejection but it should be remembered that unlike a soft picture a blurry picture will never be sharp.


    In addition, the "blurry" rejection will also be used for photos, which are out of focus. Like blurry shots, out of focus cannot be repaired, no matter how much you try to sharpen it.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/014-Blurry.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/015-Blurry-d.jpg






    4.3 Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots


    Dust spots on the sensor are one of the biggest drawbacks of DSLRs and cannot realistically be avoided, but dust spots are easily removed from pictures by using the cloning or healing tool in your editing software, it is a very simple procedure and one which every digital photographer should be able to do. Dust spots on pictures are too easy to remove for us to consider adding such images to the database.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/016-dust-k.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/017-dust-soft.jpg




    4.4 Glare/Dirt


    Glare from the sun and reflections on windows are the main culprits here, avoiding sun glare through aircraft windows is almost impossible and we do not recommend that you upload photos taken from inside aircraft unless the sun is behind you. If you are shooting from behind glass never use a flash as your photo will be completely unsuitable for JetPhotos, other than that be sure that when you are framing your subject you check around it through the viewfinder and make sure there are no reflection on the glass which will result in a rejection if uploaded. Additionally, a photo taken thru a dirty aircraft window will also be rejected, if that dirt is too distracting.




    4.5 Heat Distortion


    Photos that have visible heat distortion on the subject will be rejected.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/018-Heatdistortion.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/019...Distortion.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/020-HeatDistortion.jpg




    4.6 Vignette


    When the difference in brightness between the corners and the centre of the photo is too big. Optical vignetting is sensitive to the lens aperture and can often be cured by a reduction in aperture of 2–3 stops or in editing software.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/021-Vignette.jpg












    5 Rejection reasons explained - Exposure


    5.1 Backlit


    As a general rule: Don't take pictures with the sun in your eyes, shooting against the sun puts the visible half of the aircraft in shadow which means we can't see it to its advantage.
    As a rule of thumb: if the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.


    An exception to this is when the photographer is creating a silhouette sunset/sunrise type of shot.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/022-Backlit.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/023-Backlit.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/024-Backlit.jpg




    5.2 Contrast


    If a photo is rejected for "contrast" it means that the difference between the dark and the light areas of the picture are either too high (high contrast) or too low (low contrast). Before appealing a shot or if you are unsure, check the histogram and you will be able to identify, if there is a lack of highlights/shadows or if there is too much of them.


    Please note that photos taken in bad weather conditions are likely to be rejected for contrast reasons, unless the weather aspect adds something to the photo. Just like on this photo where the bad weather isn't adding anything to the photo https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/044-badweather.jpg




    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/025-Contrast.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/026-01-Contrast.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/026-Contrast.jpg




    5.3 Overexposed


    This means that the sensor or film was exposed to too much light and has resulted in the photo being pale in color and having a white cast to it.
    Sometimes, instead of adjusting the brightness of the whole photo, an adjustment of curves or tones will give you better results.
    As with underexposed photos, if unsure, check the histogram. It will show you, if a photo is overexposed or not.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/027-overexposed-2.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/028-Overexposed-j.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/029-Overexposed.jpg




    5.4 Underexposed / Too dark


    This means that the sensor or film was not exposed to enough light and has resulted in the picture being too dark or underexposed. Usually, the shadows will then look too dark, with a lack of details. The most important thing is for the aircraft to be correctly exposed, provided the rest of the image is not too dark or too bright your picture should be acceptable. Pictures taken under cloudy skies or at dusk and dawn frequently need to be brightened up to make them acceptable for the database, please remember to do this before uploading your picture.
    If unsure, check the histogram. It will show you, if a photo is underexposed or not.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/030-Dark.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/031-dark.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/032-Dark.jpg




    6 Rejection reasons explained - Postprocessing


    6.1 Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)


    Poor editing often results in colors which just dont look right but the most common problem is when pictures are taken from behind glass in airport terminals because this glass is tinted and creates a color cast on your pictures which does not reflect the colors you would see if you were the other side of the glass. Every editing program has a tool to alter colors and if you have been shooting from behind tinted glass these tools need to be used to make the pictures acceptable.


    In addition, a photo with too much or lack of saturation will also be rejected with this rejection reason.






    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/033-Color.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/034-color-2.jpg




    6.2 Compression


    Save your images at a high JPG quality or low compression settings. Saving at low quality settings or using a high compression rate is great for saving disk space but it means you are losing large amounts of quality from the image, areas which are the first to show signs of over-compression are where colors border each other in particular the registration and cockpit areas.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/035-Compression.jpg




    6.3 Cropping


    This means that the picture has not been cropped properly, we often see pictures with white edges visible and these should have been cropped out. The same rejection reason is also used, if the photo does not meet the requirements regarding aspect ratio as explained in chapter "Image formats"


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/036...sitioncrop.jpg




    6.4 Manipulation


    Altering of colors, other than adjusting the histogram and contrast is not accepted, for example: giving the sky a yellow cast to fake a sunset sky.


    Black and white photos are only allowed on
    ◦ scans of B/W negatives/slides
    ◦ vintage aircraft or "vintage look alikes", i.e. retro painting schemes, replicas, etc.


    Any other colour altering, including fake skies, inverting of colours, etc. is not allowed.


    Any other altering during the editing process will be rejected, this means adding things that were not originally in the picture or removing significant elements of the shot. Recent examples are: addition of glare effects, altering of regs, etc.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/037...nipulation.jpg




    6.5 Oversharpen


    All images require a degree of sharpening to make them acceptable to JetPhotos but if you overdo it the picture will look worse than when you started. Oversharpening can be recognised by the formation of jagged lines along cheatlines, wing edges and tail fins, in addition to this if you oversharpen an image it can result in a 'halo' effect appearing in areas of high contrast and in increased noise. Using a wrong method for resizing (Bilinear, Nearest Neighbour) can also create an oversharpened effect.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/038-Oversharp.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/039-Oversharpen.jpg




    6.6 Soft


    This means your picture is not sharp enough for the database, go back to your editing program and add a little more sharpening until you can get the picture to look sharp and then re-upload. Softness is usually a result of poor editing rather than a problem with the actual photographing. Many cheaper lenses will give you a soft image if used under poor light and at longer focal lengths, if this happens it is unlikely that any amount editing will save the image.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/040-soft.jpg




    6.7 Over Processed / Bad postprocessing


    This rejection may apply to photos which simply look over processed. This can be for example an improper use of noise removal programs up to the result of getting a plastic like look or smudgy edges. Also, halos caused by wrong sharpening settings or other wrong post processing settings, will result in a rejection.




    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/041...rocessed-t.jpg
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/042-overprocessed.jpg




    6.8 Too much noise or grain


    Noise is mostly a problem with digital cameras. Low end (cheaper) digital cameras are the worst offenders but it can still affect the more expensive DSLRs. An underexposed photo will tend to show more noise, when brightening it up. What the noise is for digital photography, is grain for film and slide users. Too much grain means, that areas of the picture are affected by discoloured pixels which give the picture an overall poor quality. Blue skies and shadows are usually the first areas to see this effect.




    6.9 Watermark


    Only a JetPhotos watermark applied during the upload process will be accepted. Photos containing your own watermark will not be accepted. If you choose a watermark option that is too intrusive it is possible that the photo will be rejected.


    Examples of not acceptable photos
    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/043-Watermark.jpg
    Last edited by Alex - Spot-This !; 06-11-2018 at 02:08 PM.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Munich Germany
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Please keep in mind that rarity of a photo will be taken into account by our screening team.
    Can you explain this?
    Is it not possible to upload a picture of an common aircraft, even if i have it not in my album?

  3. #3
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,874

    Default

    If you do not have a shot of a particular aircraft then you can upload it with no problem however common it is. What we are saying is that if an image has a small possibility of being rejected we will give consideration to accepting it if it has a high degree of rarity.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Pereira
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Recently I uploaded a photo ( https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8640906 ), I uploaded it as "hot", because it has a new paint job. Is OK to do this?

  5. #5
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pablo Gaviria View Post
    Recently I uploaded a photo ( https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8640906 ), I uploaded it as "hot", because it has a new paint job. Is OK to do this?
    Yes, nothing has changed about the hot photos.

    Regards
    Alex

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,223

    Default

    Jetphotos.net links do not work.

    Also special scheme - EK aircraft with the decal at the front on the A380's as it is common I would say no to special scheme?

    Also can you please add in screen shots of the screening tools for
    Dust Spots
    Dark/Over exposed
    Contrast
    As these are majority of rejections along with soft/blurry (From when I was a screener)
    Last edited by Brenden S; 07-10-2017 at 02:32 PM.

  7. #7
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brenden S View Post
    Jetphotos.net links do not work.

    Also special scheme - EK aircraft with the decal at the front on the A380's as it is common I would say no to special scheme?

    Also can you please add in screen shots of the screening tools for
    Dust Spots
    Dark/Over exposed
    Contrast
    As these are majority of rejections along with soft/blurry (From when I was a screener)
    Broken link is gone
    JP tools are now available for everyone to check his pics in queue or his rejections.

    Thanks
    Alex

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,223

    Default

    Alex, I am fully aware of the tools available, but would be good to provide examples to people who really have not much of an idea on the technical side of photography.

  9. #9
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,874

    Default

    Is there any way to make the tools available when we are processing instead of having to process, upload, and then delete the upload if there is an error. It would be especially useful if we could have the equalisation tool available in this manner. Surely it could be made available as a plug-in for Photoshop ?
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    143

    Default

    A question concerning the small prop category.

    Till now afaik it was a small prop with one prop engine only. Does it NOW mean it can also has two engines and is considered as small prop?
    C172 - still small prop of course
    King Air C90 - Small prop?

    And how strict or you with the pax amount? I mean some planes can carry from to passenger amounts. How should we know if it’s 9 pax or 10 pax if it’s not clear...

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Hi! I'd like to clearify "obstruction" as the reason for rejection.
    As I can understand from upload guidlines any obstruction is prohibited exception made only for airport equipment. Even if obstructed area is just several pixels.
    But I have two questions concerning this.
    1. From time to time I see photos on JP where some people (ussualy airport staff) obstruct the main object. For example a head obstruct the fuselage or a leg obstruct the weels. So my question. Obstruction by personal is accepted or it is just lucky accepted photos?
    2. Obstruction by fence is always prohibited or not? Sometimes at the airshow organisers use to mount a fence around exhibited aircrafts. And it's not possible to make a picture of full aircraft without obstruction. This fence is quite tiny and almost invisible in the photo but do obstruct the main object. And one more example. Sometimes the composition is interesting but from this angle you can not avoid small obstruction. Is there some exludions from this rule?

  12. #12
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MAG View Post
    Hi! I'd like to clearify "obstruction" as the reason for rejection.
    As I can understand from upload guidlines any obstruction is prohibited exception made only for airport equipment. Even if obstructed area is just several pixels.
    But I have two questions concerning this.
    1. From time to time I see photos on JP where some people (ussualy airport staff) obstruct the main object. For example a head obstruct the fuselage or a leg obstruct the weels. So my question. Obstruction by personal is accepted or it is just lucky accepted photos?
    2. Obstruction by fence is always prohibited or not? Sometimes at the airshow organisers use to mount a fence around exhibited aircrafts. And it's not possible to make a picture of full aircraft without obstruction. This fence is quite tiny and almost invisible in the photo but do obstruct the main object. And one more example. Sometimes the composition is interesting but from this angle you can not avoid small obstruction. Is there some exludions from this rule?
    hi,
    1) usually those are rejected. Now we can make exceptions for rare subject. We ask our crew to use some common sense. sometimes crew can be part of the motive but those are really exceptions. you can post example if wanted. In general we also reject shots if we feel the obstruction could have been easily avoidable (like a snow pole on a taxiing plane)

    2) We also try to be nice on airshow or exhibition shots. Sometimes we feel like people forget that before being screeners we are all spotters and know perfectly how painful those fences can be.

    hope it helps
    Cheers

    Alex

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Is it possible to split the "over\under" into "over" and "under"?
    sometimes a photo is rejected but it's not really clear if it was over or under...
    same for contrast - split into 'too much contrast" and "not enough contrast"
    many photographers shoot RAW images that can be fixed.
    Last edited by JTS; 08-16-2017 at 04:39 AM. Reason: typo

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2

    Default

    ok, accepted.

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Hey guys, i just have a small query to what you consider "Night shots", and more so to the ones shot at early morning.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	jp1.jpg 
Views:	298 
Size:	322.6 KB 
ID:	8342
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	jp3.jpg 
Views:	227 
Size:	484.3 KB 
ID:	8343
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2017-08-17 at 23.18.06.jpg 
Views:	223 
Size:	24.6 KB 
ID:	8344

    here are three examples, from what i understand both AF a343 would be a night shot(a343 landing is a screenshot), and the Air Austral is a normal shot?
    what do we think?
    regards

  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Hi

    This 2 links are deads


    1.2.7 Detailed guideline for information


    A detailed guide for civilian airlines can be found here


    A detailed guide for military airlines can be found here

  17. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Hi!

    Is this rule about hot photo applicable to all type aircrafts (civilian and military) as well to daylight and night shots?

    following will be accepted as hot
    3. Any change to the colour scheme (for example: removal of a special scheme, new stickers)

  18. #18
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MAG View Post
    Hi!

    Is this rule about hot photo applicable to all type aircrafts (civilian and military) as well to daylight and night shots?

    following will be accepted as hot
    3. Any change to the colour scheme (for example: removal of a special scheme, new stickers)
    Short answer ? ........ Yes. But only the first image uploaded if there are earlier shots in the database of the previous colours.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    431

    Default

    Re this point:
    Cloning anything in or out of a photo will mean that the photo will be rejected and you are running the risk of your upload privileges being withdrawn or limited for some time

    Does this apply to lamp-posts of anything unnecessary to the photograph? If it's easier to clone out a lamp-post rather than spend ages trying to ensure it's vertical (and thereby risk the photo), is it not better to get rid of it?

    Also, where can I find information on the New upload limits?
    Last edited by akerosid; 09-05-2017 at 04:30 PM. Reason: New question

  20. #20
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by akerosid View Post
    Re this point:
    Cloning anything in or out of a photo will mean that the photo will be rejected and you are running the risk of your upload privileges being withdrawn or limited for some time

    Does this apply to lamp-posts of anything unnecessary to the photograph? If it's easier to clone out a lamp-post rather than spend ages trying to ensure it's vertical (and thereby risk the photo), is it not better to get rid of it?

    Also, where can I find information on the New upload limits?
    Removing a lamp-post, or any other object such as fence or vehicle, or even filling in part of the frame after rotating an image will lead to an automatic rejection and warning on the first offence, an upload slot reduction on the second, and a complete ban on the third or any further transgressions.

    Upload limits have only changed for new uploaders. Older users will not see any changes other than the availability of upload slots being based on number or recent rejections - your available slots will be calculated as follows: your maximum # of upload slots - # of recent rejections = available slots.

    Thus, if your maximum # of slots is 20, and you have 6 recent rejections, you will have 14 available slots.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •