Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

YanS - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Would this shot be ok as a spotting location? What about the quality?
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]18998[/ATTACH]

    Thanks for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    In my opinion, it doesn't show enough of the location itself.
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • Hi everyone,

      Thanks, LX-A343 for your answer.

      A feedback on these two would be nice.
      1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8792v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1030946
      2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8789v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1030947

      Thanks for your replies,
      All the best,
      Yannick

      Comment


      • Originally posted by YanS View Post
        Hi everyone,

        Thanks, LX-A343 for your answer.

        A feedback on these two would be nice.
        1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19368[/ATTACH]
        2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19369[/ATTACH]

        Thanks for your replies,
        All the best,
        Yannick
        Both OK. The only thing with #2 is the jagged wing, which may be cause of a rejection.
        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

        Comment


        • Hi LX-A343,

          Thanks again for your quick answer. I gave them a chance .

          Best regards,
          Yannick
          Last edited by YanS; 2018-10-21, 17:26. Reason: spelling-mistake

          Comment


          • Hi everyone,

            A pre-screening for this beautiful preserved 727 would be great.
            1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8885 2v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	993.4 KB
ID:	1030973

            I'm not sure about obstruction on the front gear...

            Thanks for your time,
            Best regards,
            Yannick

            Comment


            • Originally posted by YanS View Post
              Hi everyone,

              A pre-screening for this beautiful preserved 727 would be great.
              1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19397[/ATTACH]

              I'm not sure about obstruction on the front gear...

              Thanks for your time,
              Best regards,
              Yannick
              Obstruction looks unavoidable, so should be acceptable. Image looks a little soft/compressed.

              Comment


              • Hi everyone,

                Thanks, dlowwa, I'll try to improve that.

                What about these?
                1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8370v3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1031034 (tried to correct the sharpening, not sure about color now.)
                2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8523v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,013.5 KB
ID:	1031035
                3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8560v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	886.3 KB
ID:	1031036 (not sure about crop here)

                And another question: Should 'special scheme' be selected for the F100 4O-AOP from my post #177?

                Thanks for your replies,
                All the best,
                Yannick
                Last edited by YanS; 2018-10-24, 17:13. Reason: added F100-question

                Comment


                • Originally posted by YanS View Post
                  Hi everyone,

                  Thanks, dlowwa, I'll try to improve that.

                  What about these?
                  1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19464[/ATTACH] (tried to correct the sharpening, not sure about color now.)
                  2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19465[/ATTACH]
                  3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19466[/ATTACH] (not sure about crop here)

                  Thanks for your replies,
                  All the best,
                  Yannick
                  1. borderline oversharpened/horizon (can't really tell on the latter)
                  2. ok
                  3. borderline cut off

                  Comment


                  • Hi everyone,

                    A feedback on this one would be great.

                    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9336v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1031467

                    I'm not sure about framing, horizon and if it's too similar to this one:
                    D-AEWP on the taxiway. A very typical situation here in Düsseldorf.. D-AEWP. Airbus A320-214. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                    Thanks for your answers,
                    All the best,
                    Yannick

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by YanS View Post
                      Hi everyone,

                      A feedback on this one would be great.

                      1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19988[/ATTACH]

                      I'm not sure about framing, horizon and if it's too similar to this one:
                      D-AEWP on the taxiway. A very typical situation here in Düsseldorf.. D-AEWP. Airbus A320-214. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                      Thanks for your answers,
                      All the best,
                      Yannick
                      Needs a little CCW rotation, otherwise should be fine.

                      Comment


                      • But if it's taken on the same day as the other pic you have in the database then yes. it would be considered as similar

                        Regards
                        Alex

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                          But if it's taken on the same day as the other pic you have in the database then yes. it would be considered as similar

                          Regards
                          Alex
                          One was taken in June, the other November, so it shouldn't be an issue.

                          Comment


                          • Hi everyone,

                            A feedback on these would be great

                            1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9341v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	978.5 KB
ID:	1031540
                            2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9271v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	982.8 KB
ID:	1031541
                            3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9247v3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	971.0 KB
ID:	1031542 (rejected for being to dark before)
                            4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9358v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	893.4 KB
ID:	1031543
                            5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9330 1v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,016.1 KB
ID:	1031539


                            As always, Thanks for your answers,
                            All the best,
                            Yannick
                            Last edited by YanS; 2018-11-28, 19:02. Reason: Links were broken

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by YanS View Post
                              Hi everyone,

                              A feedback on these would be great

                              1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20089[/ATTACH]
                              2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20090[/ATTACH]
                              3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20091[/ATTACH] (rejected for being to dark before)
                              4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20092[/ATTACH]
                              5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20088[/ATTACH]


                              As always, Thanks for your answers,
                              All the best,
                              Yannick
                              Hi Yannick,

                              #1 and 2 have a little noise/compression in the sky but not worth a rejection for me
                              #3-5 OK for me

                              Have a great evening!
                              Best Regards from Germany,
                              Julian S.​

                              Comment


                              • Hi everyone,

                                Thanks Julian!

                                Today this picture (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6964417) was rejected for an unlevelled horizon and the plane being too far. To be honest I do not agree with these aspects.

                                Horizon:
                                Looks a bit off to me too but checking the verticals I think it is ok.

                                Too far:
                                I could crop it a bit closer to the plane but I don‘t think it‘s enough for a rejection.


                                Of course this is my personal opinion, so I ask here if it‘s worth an appeal.

                                Thanks for your help,
                                All the best,
                                Yannick

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X