Originally posted by YanS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
YanS - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
It would be good to know for me if one of these could work.
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20357[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20358[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20359[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20360[/ATTACH]
5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20361[/ATTACH] (not sure about horizon here)
Thanks for your replies,
Best regards,
Yannick
Comment
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
A feedback on these four would be great .
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20758[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20759[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20760[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20761[/ATTACH]
I'm not sure about colour and horizon on them. They look a bit unlevelled but the verticals seem ok (to me)
As always, thanks for your answers,
All the best,
Yannick
Comment
-
Hi everyone,
Thanks dlowwa, for your answer. I gave #1 and a (hopefully) improved version of #2 a chance.
I also have some new photos for pre-screening:
1.
2.
3.
4. ( 'special scheme'-categroy, right?)
Thanks for your replies,
have a good start in the year 2019 and thank you to everyone who answered my questions and (pre-)screened my pictures this year!
Yannick
Comment
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
Thanks dlowwa, for your answer. I gave #1 and a (hopefully) improved version of #2 a chance.
I also have some new photos for pre-screening:
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20777[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20778[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20779[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20780[/ATTACH] ( 'special scheme'-categroy, right?)
Thanks for your replies,
have a good start in the year 2019 and thank you to everyone who answered my questions and (pre-)screened my pictures this year!
Yannick
Comment
-
Hi everyone,
Yesterday this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7036051 ) was rejected for the aircraft being obstructed by the push-back-truck. As far as know they are generally allowed but of course this one was not technically in service when the photo was taken. As it went through pre-screening (which is no guarantee ,of course ) I thought it might be OK in this case.
My question would be if this one is worth an appeal.
Thank you for your replies,
Best regards,
Yannick
Comment
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
Yesterday this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7036051 ) was rejected for the aircraft being obstructed by the push-back-truck. As far as know they are generally allowed but of course this one was not technically in service when the photo was taken. As it went through pre-screening (which is no guarantee ,of course ) I thought it might be OK in this case.
My question would be if this one is worth an appeal.
Thank you for your replies,
Best regards,
Yannick
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
Thanks dlowwa. I gave #1 a chance (with some improvements).
What about these two A319s ?
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21310[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21311[/ATTACH]
Thanks for your feedback,
All tha best,
Yannick
Comment
Comment