Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 250

Thread: YanS - Editing Advice

  1. #81
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    This picture was rejected for being soft. As it went succesfully through the pre-screening I adjusted the sharpness only a little bit. Is it better now?
    Attachment 13179

    I also have a new picture for pre-screening:
    Attachment 13180

    Thank you for your help,
    Best regards,
    yannick
    Both look soft to me, seems as if details are somewhat gone. Could be an overuse of noise reduction

  2. #82
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi everyone,

    Yesterday this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6317875 )was rejected for horizon unlevel.
    To be honest it looks a bit unlevelled to me too , but checking the verticals with the tool they seem to be correct to me.
    Is this one worth an appeal or do I see wrong?

    Thank you for your help,
    All the best,
    Yannick

  3. #83
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Yesterday this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6317875 )was rejected for horizon unlevel.
    To be honest it looks a bit unlevelled to me too , but checking the verticals with the tool they seem to be correct to me.
    Is this one worth an appeal or do I see wrong?

    Thank you for your help,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Picture looks level to me and to the other senior I've checked with.
    It is now added

    Regards
    Alex

  4. #84
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi Alex,

    Thank you so much for your time!

    All the Best,
    Yannick

  5. #85
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi everyone,

    would one of these work ?
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 318g.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	977.5 KB 
ID:	13513 (rejected for being dark before)
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 323g.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	978.2 KB 
ID:	13514 (also rejected for being dark before)
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 325g.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	889.7 KB 
ID:	13515
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 326g.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,020.3 KB 
ID:	13516

    Thank you for your help,
    all the best,
    Yannick

  6. #86
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    would one of these work ?
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 318g.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	977.5 KB 
ID:	13513 (rejected for being dark before)
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 323g.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	978.2 KB 
ID:	13514 (also rejected for being dark before)
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 325g.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	889.7 KB 
ID:	13515
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 326g.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,020.3 KB 
ID:	13516

    Thank you for your help,
    all the best,
    Yannick
    All look pretty borderline for contrast, with #3 probably having the best chance. Shot through terminal glass?

  7. #87
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi everyone!

    Thank you dlowwa for your help! No, photos were not taken through terminal-glass, just through very cold austrian air

    Today this ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6372670 ) was screened after only two days what is really awsome () and rejected for being backlit. As it went through pre-screening I think it is atleast borderline.
    Would this one be worth an appeal?

    Thank you for your help,
    All the best,
    Yannick

  8. #88
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone!

    Thank you dlowwa for your help! No, photos were not taken through terminal-glass, just through very cold austrian air

    Today this ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6372670 ) was screened after only two days what is really awsome () and rejected for being backlit. As it went through pre-screening I think it is atleast borderline.
    Would this one be worth an appeal?
    Borderline, but not really backlit imho. I would accept the appeal, but can't guarantee the other senior screeners would.

  9. #89
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi everyone

    Thank you dlowwa for your answer and also thank you to the screeners who accepted the appeal!

    Best regards,
    Yannick

  10. #90
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone

    Thank you dlowwa for your answer and also thank you to the screeners who accepted the appeal!

    Best regards,
    Yannick
    I wonder who that might have been...

  11. #91
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hello everyone,

    A pre-screen on these would be great!
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 332g.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	1,018.8 KB 
ID:	13840
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 333g.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	994.3 KB 
ID:	13841
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 334g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	13842
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 335g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	13843

    I'm not sure about 'Special scheme' on the Norwegian as well.

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick

  12. #92
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    A pre-screen on these would be great!
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 332g.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	1,018.8 KB 
ID:	13840
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 333g.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	994.3 KB 
ID:	13841
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 334g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	13842
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 335g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	13843

    I'm not sure about 'Special scheme' on the Norwegian as well.

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Hey

    #1 should be OK
    #2 looks a bit dark but otherwise OK (dont forget "special scheme" category)
    #3 should be OK
    #4 looks a bit unbalanced to me, try to center it a bit more (probably in 3:2 format). Otherwise no major issues IMO.

    About the "Special Scheme" on the Norwegian: Not needed here as Norwegian have different Persons on each Aircraft.

    Have a nice evening!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  13. #93
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi everyone,

    Thank you Julian for your feedback and congrats for beoming crew member

    I tried to improve the 737:
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 341g.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	13937

    And some new ones:
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 337g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	837.3 KB 
ID:	13938
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 338g.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	893.6 KB 
ID:	13939
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 339g.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	1,006.4 KB 
ID:	13940
    5.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 340g.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	935.8 KB 
ID:	13941

    Thank you for your advice,
    All the best
    Yannick

  14. #94
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Thank you Julian for your feedback and congrats for beoming crew member

    I tried to improve the 737:
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 341g.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	13937

    And some new ones:
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 337g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	837.3 KB 
ID:	13938
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 338g.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	893.6 KB 
ID:	13939
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 339g.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	1,006.4 KB 
ID:	13940
    5.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 340g.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	935.8 KB 
ID:	13941

    Thank you for your advice,
    All the best
    Yannick
    Hoi and thank you Yannick!

    #1 OK now
    #2 too high in Frame IMO
    #3 could use more contrast but other than that it should be OK
    #4 same as #2
    #5 same as #3

    Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  15. #95
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hello everyone,

    Would one of these work?
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 343g.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	918.0 KB 
ID:	13971
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 344g.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	986.4 KB 
ID:	13972
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 345g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	13973
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 346g.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	1,010.0 KB 
ID:	13974

    Thank you for your advive,
    All the best,
    Yannick

  16. #96
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    Would one of these work?
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 343g.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	918.0 KB 
ID:	13971
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 344g.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	986.4 KB 
ID:	13972
    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 345g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	13973
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 346g.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	1,010.0 KB 
ID:	13974

    Thank you for your advive,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Some softness and the first might need a bit of CW rotation, but otherwise no major issues.

  17. #97
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hello everyone,

    Today I got this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413411 ) rejected.
    I don't really agree with the two points and as it also went through prescreening I think it's borderline.

    Is this one worth an appeal or do I see wrong?

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the Best,
    Yannick

  18. #98
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    Today I got this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413411 ) rejected.
    I don't really agree with the two points and as it also went through prescreening I think it's borderline.

    Is this one worth an appeal or do I see wrong?

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the Best,
    Yannick
    I'd argue not quite backlit, but yes, does need a little more contrast I think.

  19. #99
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Hi everyone,

    Thank you very much for your help, dlowwa!
    I will try to add more contrast.

    A feedback on these would be great.
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 358g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	912.1 KB 
ID:	14255 (night shot category?)
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 354g.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	14256

    Thank you for your replies,
    All the best,
    Yannick

  20. #100
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Thank you very much for your help, dlowwa!
    I will try to add more contrast.

    A feedback on these would be great.
    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 358g.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	912.1 KB 
ID:	14255 (night shot category?)
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FullSizeRender 354g.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	14256

    Thank you for your replies,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Hey

    Both look OK to me and do not need the night shot category.
    But keep in mind that there can be differences between the pre-screening and the final screening result.

    Have a nice evening, Yannick!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •