Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

vcruvinel - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
    Hi! Can I have some feedback in this shots? Thanks!

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10965[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10966[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10967[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10968[/ATTACH]
    1-Check for small dust spot lower area
    2-Dark, compressed sky, soft
    3-Fine
    4-Might need small CW rotation

    For the sky shots check for dust spots in overall

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by meneses24 View Post
      1-Check for small dust spot lower area
      2-Dark, compressed sky, soft
      3-Fine
      4-Might need small CW rotation

      For the sky shots check for dust spots in overall
      Meneses, many thanks for your reply. I will upload #3 and get the others e to correct this minor issues. I will send here soon to get the feedback again!

      Thanks and have a awesome day.

      Vinicius

      Comment


      • #18
        I did not see dust spots in the LR in VQ-BTY but I verified some compression in the sky. I will correct and post later

        But corrected the issues from the others photos. See if it`s ok now!

        1.Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-DJA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	557.6 KB
ID:	1019982
        2.Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-GGJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	549.7 KB
ID:	1019983

        Thanks!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
          I did not see dust spots in the LR in VQ-BTY but I verified some compression in the sky. I will correct and post later

          But corrected the issues from the others photos. See if it`s ok now!

          1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10983[/ATTACH]
          2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10984[/ATTACH]

          Thanks!
          Hi,
          I doubt the cropping is whiten the accepted numbers (it's almost squared now) - The 737 needs a 0.2 CW rotation but except that they look okay.

          Regards
          Alex

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
            Hi,
            I doubt the cropping is whiten the accepted numbers (it's almost squared now) - The 737 needs a 0.2 CW rotation but except that they look okay.

            Regards
            Alex
            Alex, thanks for you reply! I will see the cropping from #1 (maybe I forgot to set the 4:3 proportion and just move the frame!) and rotate the 737 as you suggest.

            Can you (or any other member) please give me feedback in this one? I uploaded but got rejected for softness https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6166935. After the rejection I edit again and also improve the colors (as the shot was took in the sundown).

            Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TTO.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	471.9 KB
ID:	1019989

            One more:

            #1.Click image for larger version

Name:	Beech.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	758.7 KB
ID:	1020012

            Take the opportunity for one more question: this aircraft https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6177953 that I`ve uploaded and still in the queue have to be in the small prop category?

            Thanks!
            Attached Files

            Comment


            • #21
              The TAP looks now acceptable - The Beech will not be accepted as it's way too dark (darker than sky even) - and there's not much you can do to improve that. The Cessna does need the small prop category

              Regards
              Alex

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                The TAP looks now acceptable - The Beech will not be accepted as it's way too dark (darker than sky even) - and there's not much you can do to improve that. The Cessna does need the small prop category

                Regards
                Alex
                Alex, thanks for your feeback. I will upload the TAP again as now looks acceptable.

                Have a nice day!

                Vinicius

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                  Alex, thanks for you reply! I will see the cropping from #1 (maybe I forgot to set the 4:3 proportion and just move the frame!) and rotate the 737 as you suggest.

                  Can you (or any other member) please give me feedback in this one? I uploaded but got rejected for softness https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6166935. After the rejection I edit again and also improve the colors (as the shot was took in the sundown).

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]10990[/ATTACH]

                  One more:

                  #1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11014[/ATTACH]

                  Take the opportunity for one more question: this aircraft https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6177953 that I`ve uploaded and still in the queue have to be in the small prop category?

                  Thanks!
                  Hello friend,

                  According to the new rules for small prop: A/C with props, for up to 10 pax is Small Prop. So I believe it's the case of you photo.
                  Regards

                  Capucho

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Capucho View Post
                    Hello friend,

                    According to the new rules for small prop: A/C with props, for up to 10 pax is Small Prop. So I believe it's the case of you photo.
                    Regards

                    Capucho
                    Capucho, thanks for the tip! I check the "Small Prop" catagory after your and Alex explanation. Taking the opportunity: Congrats for your shots, just like the E2 shot (PR-ZIJ). Beautiful! And also glad to got some help/advice from a brazilian too

                    Thanks!

                    Vinicius

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hi Vinicius,
                      Many thanks for your kind reply and complements to my pics. I did not realize that your concern was already answered, so I'm sorry for that.
                      Anyway, it's nice to be in touch.
                      Congrats on your pictures also. Looking foward to see more of it.
                      Take care.

                      Capucho
                      Capucho

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hi! Can anyone please give some feedback in this shots?

                        1.Click image for larger version

Name:	VQ-BTY.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	428.3 KB
ID:	1020073
                        2.Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-IOB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	483.6 KB
ID:	1020074
                        3.Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-GGJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	564.5 KB
ID:	1020075
                        4.Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JCA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	623.0 KB
ID:	1020076 [Special Scheme?]
                        5.Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HTVC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	556.6 KB
ID:	1020077 [Special Scheme?]

                        Many thanks!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                          Hi! Can anyone please give some feedback in this shots?

                          4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11096[/ATTACH] [Special Scheme?]
                          5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11097[/ATTACH] [Special Scheme?]

                          Many thanks!
                          Hey

                          4. Special Scheme - Yes, but needs more contrast i think.
                          5. Special Scheme - No (New Standart Livery) In my opinion needs more contrast too.

                          Hope this helps.
                          Nice Pics btw
                          Best Regards from Germany,
                          Julian S.​

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                            Hey

                            4. Special Scheme - Yes, but needs more contrast i think.
                            5. Special Scheme - No (New Standart Livery) In my opinion needs more contrast too.

                            Hope this helps.
                            Nice Pics btw
                            Hey Julian! Thanks for the feedback! I will put more contrast to compare! About the others...You think they are ok?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                              Hi! Can anyone please give some feedback in this shots?

                              1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11093[/ATTACH]
                              2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11094[/ATTACH]
                              3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11095[/ATTACH]
                              4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11096[/ATTACH] [Special Scheme?]
                              5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11097[/ATTACH] [Special Scheme?]

                              Many thanks!
                              1. ok
                              2. borderline horizon (ccw)
                              3. horizon (cw)
                              4. contrast
                              5. borderline contrast

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                1. ok
                                2. borderline horizon (ccw)
                                3. horizon (cw)
                                4. contrast
                                5. borderline contrast
                                Dana, thanks for you quick feedback. I will check and correct all the points. I really have some doubts in number #3 as I used the tower from the left as a vertical reference. There is a better point to reference the level from this image?

                                Many thanks as always!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X