Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pauwelsc - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Thank you for the previous pre-screens! Wondering what you are thinking of these ones...

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FOZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.38 MB
ID:	1020068 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZIJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1020069 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-OZBE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1020070 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JYD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1020071 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	M-GDRS.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1020072

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
      Thank you for the previous pre-screens! Wondering what you are thinking of these ones...

      1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11088[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11089[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11090[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11091[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11092[/ATTACH]
      1. contrast a bit harsh, but probably ok.
      2. ok
      3-4 borderline soft
      5. very soft, almost blurry

      Comment


      • #18
        Would this get accepted as a cockpit shot? Thanks

        Click image for larger version

Name:	oo-tcq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	379.2 KB
ID:	1020081

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
          Would this get accepted as a cockpit shot? Thanks

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]11104[/ATTACH]
          I would vote to reject it with the reason obstruction/clutter. The Captain's arm is distracting and the shot could have been taken without his arm in the way if he had moved it.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
            I would vote to reject it with the reason obstruction/clutter. The Captain's arm is distracting and the shot could have been taken without his arm in the way if he had moved it.
            I thought the arm would be a problem... Thank you for your quick response. Maybe this one is better?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-TCQ front.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1020083

            Comment


            • #21
              I got a positive pre-screens on these ones but after checking the equalised version, I am not sure about the equalised version... Could you have a look on this? Thank you for your continued support here on the forums

              Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TJGeq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	1020101 Click image for larger version

Name:	ei-fhleq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.49 MB
ID:	1020099 Click image for larger version

Name:	g-dbcdeq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.50 MB
ID:	1020100 Click image for larger version

Name:	YL-PSGeq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1020102

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                I got a positive pre-screens on these ones but after checking the equalised version, I am not sure about the equalised version... Could you have a look on this? Thank you for your continued support here on the forums

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11127[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]11125[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]11126[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]11128[/ATTACH]
                A) equalized images aren't screened, the ones you submitted are
                B) other than the first (light halo), I don't really see what the issues are?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  A) equalized images aren't screened, the ones you submitted are
                  B) other than the first (light halo), I don't really see what the issues are?
                  Well, then I will met them with great pleasure in the queue! I really thought there was something with... Thank you for you answer, Dana!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                    I thought the arm would be a problem... Thank you for your quick response. Maybe this one is better?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11107[/ATTACH]
                    What do you think?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                      What do you think?
                      Bit dark and soft

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Are these good for the database? Thanks!

                        1. Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-TCQ front edit.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.45 MB
ID:	1020183 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIDQside.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,002.7 KB
ID:	1020184 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ATUK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1020185 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-DWG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1020186 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBAVzij.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1020187

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                          Are these good for the database? Thanks!

                          1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11222[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11223[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11224[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11225[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11226[/ATTACH]
                          1. contrast
                          2-4 ok
                          5. soft/blurry, heat distortion

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Good now? I hope it is! Thanks!!

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-TCQ front edit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1020210

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                              Good now? I hope it is! Thanks!!

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11256[/ATTACH]
                              Contrast ok, but on second inspection you might want to double check the leveling, might need a little CW.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                Contrast ok, but on second inspection you might want to double check the leveling, might need a little CW.
                                That cockpit shot took me already a lot of forum posts! I hope it's finally fixed now as I am keen to add this to the database! I hope the CW is fine now, I can't change it more. Thanks for the continued support, I know I ask a lot sometimes

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-TCQ front edit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1020222

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X