Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pauwelsc - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Hey team! My last attempt on that fokker taking-off. I sharpened the edges so normally it should be fixed/ better. Thanks!!

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IPT edit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	752.0 KB
ID:	1020578 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVF edit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1020579 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	766.2 KB
ID:	1020580

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
      Hey team! My last attempt on that fokker taking-off. I sharpened the edges so normally it should be fixed/ better. Thanks!!

      1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11698[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11699[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11700[/ATTACH]
      1. contrast
      2. borderline contrast
      3. dark/contrast

      Comment


      • #63
        Hey team,

        Could you check these? Thanks a lot!

        1. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-OOBF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1020712 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JYD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.26 MB
ID:	1020713 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-DAR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	771.2 KB
ID:	1020714 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZUO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	871.8 KB
ID:	1020715 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ATUH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	783.5 KB
ID:	1020716

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
          Hey team,

          Could you check these? Thanks a lot!

          1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11849[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11850[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11851[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11852[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11853[/ATTACH]
          1. soft, dirty
          2. soft, color, overprocessed
          3. soft, overprocessed
          4. soft, backlit, overprocessed
          5. soft, dark, centering, overprocessed

          Comment


          • #65
            Hey team! This one got rejected yesterday: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6219818

            Would it get accepted when I sharpen it a bit or are there other issues with the picture?

            Thanks a lot!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
              Hey team! This one got rejected yesterday: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6219818

              Would it get accepted when I sharpen it a bit or are there other issues with the picture?

              Thanks a lot!
              It has only been rejected for that. I for one would also have rejected for centering, as the aircraft is too high IMO. So, if you can correct that issue as well, OK, otherwise give it a try after sharpening it.
              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                It has only been rejected for that. I for one would also have rejected for centering, as the aircraft is too high IMO. So, if you can correct that issue as well, OK, otherwise give it a try after sharpening it.
                Before re-uploading it to the queue, I will let you check it in here. Thanks for the feedback!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                  Before re-uploading it to the queue, I will let you check it in here. Thanks for the feedback!
                  I updated the picture: would it now get accepted in the queue? thanks

                  Edited: Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-LUD edit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1020741
                  Original (which got rejected): Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-LUD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.29 MB
ID:	1020742

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                    I updated the picture: would it now get accepted in the queue? thanks

                    Edited: [ATTACH=CONFIG]11880[/ATTACH]
                    Original (which got rejected): [ATTACH=CONFIG]11881[/ATTACH]
                    Still quite soft, and almost blurry toward the edges.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Hey team! Could you check these ones? Thanks a lot!!

                      1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MJO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	779.8 KB
ID:	1020770 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TAWL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	788.9 KB
ID:	1020771 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-NAD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.26 MB
ID:	1020772 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-MARA.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	847.8 KB
ID:	1020774 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-ESX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	966.7 KB
ID:	1020773

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                        Hey team! Could you check these ones? Thanks a lot!!

                        1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11915[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11916[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11917[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11921[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11920[/ATTACH]
                        first loks acceptable, 2-4 have rather dark fuselages, last has a dark fuselage and a blown out front
                        Last edited by pdeboer; 2017-12-10, 09:10.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Hey team, what do you think of these pictures? Thanks!

                          1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-EVC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	823.1 KB
ID:	1020815 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	859.2 KB
ID:	1020816 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-RSC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	972.1 KB
ID:	1020817 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	LX-LBB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	934.2 KB
ID:	1020818 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LCA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	772.6 KB
ID:	1020819

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                            Hey team, what do you think of these pictures? Thanks!

                            1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11963[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11964[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11965[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11966[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11967[/ATTACH]
                            All soft/borderline soft, with 1/3/5 also a bit dark.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Hey team, I updated the previous pictures, I added some light at the Ryanair and sharpened the other pictures too. Is it acceptable now?

                              1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-EVC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1020875 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	804.8 KB
ID:	1020876 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	LX-LBB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1020878 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBAL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	953.0 KB
ID:	1020879 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-FBEI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1020880

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                                Hey team, I updated the previous pictures, I added some light at the Ryanair and sharpened the other pictures too. Is it acceptable now?

                                1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]12030[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]12031[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]12033[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]12034[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]12035[/ATTACH]
                                1. ok
                                2. overprocessed
                                3. ok
                                4. borderline dark
                                5. soft

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X