Page 20 of 22 FirstFirst ... 101819202122 LastLast
Results 381 to 400 of 430

Thread: Kyle McKinlay - Editing Advice

  1. #381
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    1: too big to be uploaded, won't comment more, as you will have to edit it anyway
    2, 3, 5: OK
    4: backlit

  2. #382
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback! Ah, uploaded the higher resolution copy by mistake. Iíll upload again at my next 24hr period

  3. #383
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks for the feedback! Ah, uploaded the higher resolution copy by mistake. I’ll upload again at my next 24hr period
    naah! upload it now!!

  4. #384
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    How is this one then? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N809TA_PHKO_0123.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	471.8 KB 
ID:	26125

  5. #385
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Also, just for advice, do you reckon it may be nicer to have the aircraft without the small section of ground/sea and just sky? I have a shot from the same sequence, but I couldn't decide which. :P

  6. #386
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,431

    Default

    I like it framed with the sea like you did

  7. #387
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Thank you Alex!

  8. #388
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Could I please ask for feedback on these images? Thank you very much.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TF-FIS_EGPF_7030.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	403.5 KB 
ID:	26257
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDL_EGPF_6958.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	505.1 KB 
ID:	26258
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FBJK_EGPF_6799.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	392.3 KB 
ID:	26259
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-JZHO_EGPF_5650.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	774.6 KB 
ID:	26260
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZWF_EGPF_5727.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	652.1 KB 
ID:	26261

  9. #389
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Could I please ask for feedback on these images? Thank you very much.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TF-FIS_EGPF_7030.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	403.5 KB 
ID:	26257
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDL_EGPF_6958.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	505.1 KB 
ID:	26258
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FBJK_EGPF_6799.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	392.3 KB 
ID:	26259
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-JZHO_EGPF_5650.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	774.6 KB 
ID:	26260
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZWF_EGPF_5727.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	652.1 KB 
ID:	26261

    Hi Kyle
    1-4 Contrast (3 Heat)
    5. Colour - wings green/yellow!
    regards T

  10. #390
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Thank you for the feedback! Although taken in May, that EasyJet shot was actually during a cold early morning and have plenty of other shots to show that the green wings are actually de-icer! Would it be ok otherwise?

  11. #391
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you for the feedback! Although taken in May, that EasyJet shot was actually during a cold early morning and have plenty of other shots to show that the green wings are actually de-icer! Would it be ok otherwise?
    seems ok (no guarantees ) put a note on about the deicer) T

  12. #392
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    How is this image? Many thanks

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N596FE_PHNL_1270.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	330.4 KB 
ID:	26379

  13. #393
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How is this image? Many thanks

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N596FE_PHNL_1270.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	330.4 KB 
ID:	26379
    Hi Kylie, nice composition. For me the heat/softness on the starboard wing - h/stab is too much
    Regards T

  14. #394
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Ah, thatís a pity...even though itís from the engine number 2? Thanks for the feedback.

  15. #395
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    How are these two images? May I also please have feedback with regards to the last post? Thank you very much.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N403SY_KMRY_2191.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	376.1 KB 
ID:	26519
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N227NN_KMRY_2230.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	462.0 KB 
ID:	26520
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N370HA_PHNL_1105.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	300.1 KB 
ID:	26521
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N829MH_PHNL_1143.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	379.5 KB 
ID:	26522

  16. #396
    Member pawelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Ah, that’s a pity...even though it’s from the engine number 2? Thanks for the feedback.
    I'm not a screener, but that's what I thought. It looks like exhaust gases

  17. #397
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these two images? May I also please have feedback with regards to the last post? Thank you very much.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N403SY_KMRY_2191.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	376.1 KB 
ID:	26519
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N227NN_KMRY_2230.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	462.0 KB 
ID:	26520
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N370HA_PHNL_1105.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	300.1 KB 
ID:	26521
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N829MH_PHNL_1143.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	379.5 KB 
ID:	26522
    First two have a contrast problem as the fuselage is not well lit and sort of blends in with the background. Number three and four look oversharpend to me

  18. #398
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these two images? May I also please have feedback with regards to the last post? Thank you very much.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N403SY_KMRY_2191.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	376.1 KB 
ID:	26519
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N227NN_KMRY_2230.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	462.0 KB 
ID:	26520
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N370HA_PHNL_1105.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	300.1 KB 
ID:	26521
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N829MH_PHNL_1143.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	379.5 KB 
ID:	26522
    "Ah, that’s a pity...even though it’s from the engine number 2? Thanks for the feedback."

    Figured I Had answered this, seems not.
    rejection = Heat Hazed
    Last edited by 777MAN; 07-21-2019 at 07:39 PM.

  19. #399
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback on the previous post. I'm having a more general editing issue, and was wondering if I could have advice please. When the same very simple edit is carried out on this image in Camera Raw 9.5 and in Lightroom separately, the histograms are very different. The Lightroom histogram shows a well exposed image, though the Camera Raw 9.5 version shows the reds being drastically blown out. I've reckoned this has caused me to do some strange edits to keep the image staying bright in the past, but I cannot find out why this difference exists. The edited image appears to be the exact same result from both programmes, though it is just very off putting of the CR9.5 which makes me think it has bad clipping.

    One might say to just use Lightroom if that is the case, though the lightroom screenshot is from someone else's PC and it is only this version of Camera Raw that I use.

    I'd greatly appreciate any insight as to why there is a difference between these two, so I can perhaps salvage some of my older shots that I thought were ruined due to slight clipping like this one

    I've attached two screenshots, and a version of the EK 777. Would the reds be too great in this example?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot (17).jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	19.6 KB 
ID:	26914

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_9480.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	568.1 KB 
ID:	26920
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_9840.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	20.1 KB 
ID:	26913  

  20. #400
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Hi Kylie,

    Each time you edit, you refresh the histogram (Lightroom doesnt reflect this) . In the latest version of Photoshop histogram you will see a small (top right ) warning triangle, you must refresh it each time you do an adjustment (eye opening). Seems like small beer, but it can mean a lot on adjustments. Does that reflect what you are seeing?

    PS the screenshots are too small for me (i guess anyone ) to offer comment on.

    Happy send me a RAW etc.. mate

    T
    Last edited by 777MAN; 07-30-2019 at 10:06 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •