Page 6 of 20 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 394

Thread: Kyle McKinlay - Editing Advice

  1. #101
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    I've deleted this one from the queue as I think I've maybe spotted a few dust spots, an I right, or is it just me...? Thanks.

    Attachment 14898
    Don't see any dust, though it looks like a window reflection in the upper left corner.

  2. #102
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    It was taken through a window, and after spending a good while annoyed that it had ruined the image, I remembered that it was a KLM 737 taxiing by. Thanks for the quick reply as always dlowwa!

  3. #103
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    How are these shots? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CS-LTC_GCTS_9751.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	590.3 KB 
ID:	14960
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDH_GCTS_9886.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	571.7 KB 
ID:	14961
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RA-76503_GCTS_9649.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	509.5 KB 
ID:	14962
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RA-76503_GCTS_9684.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	505.4 KB 
ID:	14963
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	X_GCTS_9901.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	484.5 KB 
ID:	14964

  4. #104
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these shots? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CS-LTC_GCTS_9751.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	590.3 KB 
ID:	14960
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDH_GCTS_9886.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	571.7 KB 
ID:	14961
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RA-76503_GCTS_9649.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	509.5 KB 
ID:	14962
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RA-76503_GCTS_9684.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	505.4 KB 
ID:	14963
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	X_GCTS_9901.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	484.5 KB 
ID:	14964
    1. borderline contrast
    2. oversharpened
    3-5 borderline contrast

  5. #105
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Okay, think I have improved them for upload now. Thanks!

  6. #106
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    How are these shots? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-IVO_GCTS_9892.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	609.9 KB 
ID:	15007
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-OOBD_GCTS_9723.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	546.4 KB 
ID:	15008
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FDZF_GCTS_9861.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	679.9 KB 
ID:	15009
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OO-TUP_GCTS_9825.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	617.3 KB 
ID:	15010
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDB_GCTS_9788.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	589.3 KB 
ID:	15011

  7. #107
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these shots? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-IVO_GCTS_9892.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	609.9 KB 
ID:	15007
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-OOBD_GCTS_9723.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	546.4 KB 
ID:	15008
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FDZF_GCTS_9861.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	679.9 KB 
ID:	15009
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OO-TUP_GCTS_9825.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	617.3 KB 
ID:	15010
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDB_GCTS_9788.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	589.3 KB 
ID:	15011
    Borderline light on the last four, but the quality looks ok.

  8. #108
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these shots? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-IVO_GCTS_9892.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	609.9 KB 
ID:	15007
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-OOBD_GCTS_9723.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	546.4 KB 
ID:	15008
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FDZF_GCTS_9861.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	679.9 KB 
ID:	15009
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OO-TUP_GCTS_9825.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	617.3 KB 
ID:	15010
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDB_GCTS_9788.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	589.3 KB 
ID:	15011
    they are all borderline contrast/tad too dark

  9. #109
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    How are these two? Many thanks for the previous reply also.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FDZE_GCTS_9699.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	783.6 KB 
ID:	15138
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-ENV_EGPF_9955.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	481.9 KB 
ID:	15139
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-ENV_EGPF_9962.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	583.4 KB 
ID:	15140

  10. #110
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these two? Many thanks for the previous reply also.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-FDZE_GCTS_9699.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	783.6 KB 
ID:	15138
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-ENV_EGPF_9955.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	481.9 KB 
ID:	15139
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-ENV_EGPF_9962.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	583.4 KB 
ID:	15140
    first is cut off and to dark
    2 and 3 are similar, i prefer the the lighter one, no. 3

  11. #111
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Great, thanks. How are these? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CH-10_EGPF_0272.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	633.9 KB 
ID:	15380
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CH-10_EGPF_0261.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	504.3 KB 
ID:	15381
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CH-12_EGPF_0198.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	539.0 KB 
ID:	15382
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDJ_EGPF_0309.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	426.7 KB 
ID:	15383

  12. #112
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Great, thanks. How are these? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CH-10_EGPF_0272.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	633.9 KB 
ID:	15380
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CH-10_EGPF_0261.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	504.3 KB 
ID:	15381
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CH-12_EGPF_0198.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	539.0 KB 
ID:	15382
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-TCDJ_EGPF_0309.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	426.7 KB 
ID:	15383
    1-2 similar
    3. ok
    4. ok

  13. #113
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Thank you for the previous reply dlowwa. How is this one? I had a rejection due to softness of a similar shot recently, but have hopefully resolved it with this different image. Thank you for your time

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EBE_EGPF_0378.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	531.9 KB 
ID:	15499

  14. #114
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you for the previous reply dlowwa. How is this one?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EBE_EGPF_0378.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	531.9 KB 
ID:	15499
    Very soft.

  15. #115
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Hmm...thanks. Any improvement? Reduced to 1024x576 and sharpened a little more. Thanks dlowwa.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EBE_EGPF_TEST_0378.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	472.5 KB 
ID:	15520

  16. #116
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Hmm...thanks. Any improvement? Reduced to 1024x576 and sharpened a little more. Thanks dlowwa.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EBE_EGPF_TEST_0378.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	472.5 KB 
ID:	15520
    No, will still be rejected for soft.

  17. #117
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Okay, I give up with that one then! However, another day, another 777...this any better? Thanks.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-ENV_EGPF_0436.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	634.3 KB 
ID:	15560

  18. #118
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Okay, I give up with that one then! However, another day, another 777...this any better? Thanks.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-ENV_EGPF_0436.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	634.3 KB 
ID:	15560
    Too much noise and contrast too low. Looks like shot from quite a distance, so a heavy crop. Probably not fixable.

  19. #119
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Perhaps this one is acceptable? Thank you very much!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EGK_EGPF_0571.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	467.1 KB 
ID:	15685

  20. #120
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Perhaps this one is acceptable? Thank you very much!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EGK_EGPF_0571.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	467.1 KB 
ID:	15685
    Likely rejected for compression/noise and soft. You can post further edits if you would like, but I won't be commenting on them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •