Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. centering ok, borderline soft
    2. borderline soft/color
    3. ok
    Dana, thank you for your time

    Uploaded The Qatar and after some extra work the TUI.

    Some nasty ''contrasty'' ones for advice.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5264.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	724.9 KB
ID:	1028096
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5311.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	695.4 KB
ID:	1028097
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5319.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	618.8 KB
ID:	1028098

    Of course, if there is more, I want to know as well.

    Thanks in advance

    Best Regards.

    Wilko

    Comment


    • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      Dana, thank you for your time

      Uploaded The Qatar and after some extra work the TUI.

      Some nasty ''contrasty'' ones for advice.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15922[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15923[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15924[/ATTACH]

      Of course, if there is more, I want to know as well.

      Thanks in advance

      Best Regards.

      Wilko
      1: OK
      2, 3: borderline soft/overexposed.
      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

      Comment


      • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
        1: OK
        2, 3: borderline soft/overexposed.
        Thank you Gerardo.

        After correcting 2 and 3 I will try number 3.

        Want to show nr 2 again as I think it's maybe too dark now and also color/contrast could become an issue

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5311.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	747.3 KB
ID:	1028175

        Got this one rejected again. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6570905

        Compared to the 2nd attempt ( after reading the appeal message from the screener to that one , I had to agree it was too soft indeed)I did a fair amount of sharpening again.
        To me it still seems ok. (More sharpening would result in jaggies in my opinion.)
        The original is not blurred and I had no message with my reject email.
        Could it be worth an appeal or am I missing something deerly.

        Hoping you could help me out.

        Thanks in Advance.

        Best Regards.

        Wilko

        Comment


        • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
          Thank you Gerardo.

          After correcting 2 and 3 I will try number 3.

          Want to show nr 2 again as I think it's maybe too dark now and also color/contrast could become an issue

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]16010[/ATTACH]

          Got this one rejected again. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6570905

          Compared to the 2nd attempt ( after reading the appeal message from the screener to that one , I had to agree it was too soft indeed)I did a fair amount of sharpening again.
          To me it still seems ok. (More sharpening would result in jaggies in my opinion.)
          The original is not blurred and I had no message with my reject email.
          Could it be worth an appeal or am I missing something deerly.

          Hoping you could help me out.

          Thanks in Advance.

          Best Regards.

          Wilko
          The LX A333 looks OK in my opinion ... and it reminds me on how much I hate those poles in ZRH!!!

          The AC B787 is borderline IMO. Try an appeal, chances are fair. If it fails, try to start from scratch and apply a bit more sharpening, maybe only Unsharp Mask or Selective Sharpening.
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
            The LX A333 looks OK in my opinion ... and it reminds me on how much I hate those poles in ZRH!!!

            The AC B787 is borderline IMO. Try an appeal, chances are fair. If it fails, try to start from scratch and apply a bit more sharpening, maybe only Unsharp Mask or Selective Sharpening.
            Thank you again. Agree with you about the poles. had to make the best of it as I had no car during my visit.
            I have uploaded the LX A333 and appealed on the AC 787. The appeal got accepted.

            Five new ones for pre-screen.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2450.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	669.7 KB
ID:	1028246
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2470.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	703.4 KB
ID:	1028247
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2511.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	449.6 KB
ID:	1028248
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2568.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	691.6 KB
ID:	1028249
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2647.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	518.2 KB
ID:	1028250

            They were all taken (early) evening . but I think only the last three should be night shots, but correct me if i'm wrong.
            Feel ofcourse free to mention other points.

            Thank you in advance.

            Best Regards.

            Wilko

            Comment


            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
              Thank you again. Agree with you about the poles. had to make the best of it as I had no car during my visit.
              I have uploaded the LX A333 and appealed on the AC 787. The appeal got accepted.

              Five new ones for pre-screen.

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16087[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16088[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16089[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16090[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16091[/ATTACH]

              They were all taken (early) evening . but I think only the last three should be night shots, but correct me if i'm wrong.
              Feel ofcourse free to mention other points.

              Thank you in advance.

              Best Regards.

              Wilko
              All are soft, especially towards the tail; last one borderline for contrast.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                All are soft, especially towards the tail; last one borderline for contrast.
                Thanks Dana,

                Due to your words, I made the decision not to go on with any of those.

                I made three edits from different shots of 2,3 and 4. Here they are.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2471.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	670.4 KB
ID:	1028331
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2513.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	792.0 KB
ID:	1028332
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2567.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	749.2 KB
ID:	1028333

                Did serious more sharpening on those, but still have a lot of doubts.

                And two other new ones.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2565.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	642.0 KB
ID:	1028334
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2611.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	436.5 KB
ID:	1028335

                Thank you in Advance.

                Best Regards,

                Wilko

                Comment


                • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                  Thanks Dana,

                  Due to your words, I made the decision not to go on with any of those.

                  I made three edits from different shots of 2,3 and 4. Here they are.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16180[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16181[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16182[/ATTACH]

                  Did serious more sharpening on those, but still have a lot of doubts.

                  And two other new ones.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16183[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16184[/ATTACH]

                  Thank you in Advance.

                  Best Regards,

                  Wilko
                  1-4 borderline soft/contrast
                  5 contrast

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    1-4 borderline soft/contrast
                    5 contrast
                    Thank You Dana, will try some of them (Not 5).
                    However, I bought myself a new body and this caused me to change from editing tools..
                    Went also to LHR this weekend.
                    Try to get myself into the new things.

                    Started editing today and I would like to receive advice on these three.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1026-3.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	604.8 KB
ID:	1028486
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1099.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	515.9 KB
ID:	1028487
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1208.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	540.5 KB
ID:	1028488

                    Thank you in Advance.

                    Best Regards,

                    Wilko

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                      Thank You Dana, will try some of them (Not 5).
                      However, I bought myself a new body and this caused me to change from editing tools..
                      Went also to LHR this weekend.
                      Try to get myself into the new things.

                      Started editing today and I would like to receive advice on these three.

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16365[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16366[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16367[/ATTACH]

                      Thank you in Advance.

                      Best Regards,

                      Wilko
                      All slightly dark but otherwise ok.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        All slightly dark but otherwise ok.
                        Thank you so much Dana,

                        Gave all a slight lift in exposure and will try definetely the Etihad and the Air New Zealand.

                        Five new ones for advice.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0165.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	511.4 KB
ID:	1028540
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0532.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	622.8 KB
ID:	1028541
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0657.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	545.9 KB
ID:	1028542
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0824.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	468.5 KB
ID:	1028543
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0888.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	518.4 KB
ID:	1028544

                        Thank you in Advance.

                        Best Regards,

                        Wilko

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                          Five new ones for advice.
                          Should be fine.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                            Should be fine.
                            Awesome Dana, thank you, I will give them a try.

                            Five new ones for advice.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0220.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	544.2 KB
ID:	1028588
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0456.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	555.3 KB
ID:	1028589
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0678-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	578.8 KB
ID:	1028590
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0895-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	532.6 KB
ID:	1028591
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1199.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	593.6 KB
ID:	1028592

                            Thank you in Advance.

                            Best regards,

                            Wilko

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                              Awesome Dana, thank you, I will give them a try.

                              Five new ones for advice.

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16497[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16498[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16499[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16500[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16501[/ATTACH]

                              Thank you in Advance.

                              Best regards,

                              Wilko
                              Wilko,

                              IMHO #1, #2 and #4 looks ok. number #4 appear to be backlit (better wait more comments) and #5 is high in frame.

                              Cheers,

                              Vinicius

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                                Awesome Dana, thank you, I will give them a try.

                                Five new ones for advice.

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16497[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16498[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16499[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16500[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16501[/ATTACH]

                                Thank you in Advance.

                                Best regards,

                                Wilko
                                1 & 3 borderline for contrast, but otherwise they should be ok.

                                Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                                Wilko,

                                number #4 appear to be backlit (better wait more comments)
                                Perhaps you meant #3? #4 is not even close to being backlit.

                                Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                                and #5 is high in frame.
                                Once again, centering is not an issue.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X