Page 16 of 19 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 320 of 363

Thread: wkd001- Editing advice

  1. #301
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Gerardo,

    Pulled the Belavia 737 a little down. Is it better now?
    Attachment 21631

    And four others for advice.

    Attachment 21632. Thinking it has too flat contrast.
    Attachment 21633 Crop too tight? Entire aircraft was not included in the RAW-file. It's not that much different.
    Attachment 21634 sharpness and contrast
    Attachment 21635 horizon especially, seems off to me, but I'm unsure.

    Thank you in advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko
    1: OK-ish, I personally would add a tad more sharpening and place it a little lower
    2: OK
    3: OK-ish, if you can add a bit space above the tail, better. Looks also borderline soft
    4: OK
    5: a tad dark, even if I would accept it

  2. #302
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: OK-ish, I personally would add a tad more sharpening and place it a little lower
    2: OK
    3: OK-ish, if you can add a bit space above the tail, better. Looks also borderline soft
    4: OK
    5: a tad dark, even if I would accept it
    Thanks a lot Gerardo,

    Will see wat to do with the Belavia. have to study it properly at the moment.
    Took another one from the Delta A330 to edit , as I couldn't create more space above the tail.
    Also on this one no entire aircraft included.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6230.JPG 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	21662

    Four new ones for advice from a very windy day here yesterday.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6413-2.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	813.3 KB 
ID:	21663 Not sure about the exact amount of sharpening here.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6582-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	811.7 KB 
ID:	21664 Contrast and sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6599.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	959.2 KB 
ID:	21665 Not too similar with this one I assume https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8849957
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6634.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	845.6 KB 
ID:	21666 Especially contrast.

    Thank You in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

  3. #303
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,375

    Default

    Hi,
    The Delta 330 would work for me with the crop above.
    Norwegian 787 is a tad soft but not much
    747, charnels ok but borderline contrast
    KLM, should be ok and not similar (ground vs no ground)
    Turkish, borderline contrast (white plane and light sky)

    Hope it helps

    Alex

  4. #304
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Hi,
    The Delta 330 would work for me with the crop above.
    Norwegian 787 is a tad soft but not much
    747, charnels ok but borderline contrast
    KLM, should be ok and not similar (ground vs no ground)
    Turkish, borderline contrast (white plane and light sky)

    Hope it helps

    Alex
    Thanks a lot Alex, that helps indeed.

    Will try the A330 and the KLM.
    I remain with two questions.
    What do you mean with the charnels on the ABC 747?, can't really figure out tbh.

    2nd question is about the Norwegian 787. I reworked it a little and added sharpness on ( to me) soft places. Coming to this.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6413-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	948.6 KB 
ID:	21705

    And three more for pre-screen/ advice , due to challenging conditions last saturday

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6441-2.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	975.8 KB 
ID:	21706 Especially contrast and color.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6451.JPG 
Views:	23 
Size:	585.7 KB 
ID:	21707 afraid for contrast/backlit.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6553-2.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	726.8 KB 
ID:	21708 contrast especially .

    Thank you in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

  5. #305
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Alex, that helps indeed.

    Will try the A330 and the KLM.
    I remain with two questions.
    What do you mean with the charnels on the ABC 747?, can't really figure out tbh.

    2nd question is about the Norwegian 787. I reworked it a little and added sharpness on ( to me) soft places. Coming to this.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6413-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	948.6 KB 
ID:	21705

    And three more for pre-screen/ advice , due to challenging conditions last saturday

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6441-2.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	975.8 KB 
ID:	21706 Especially contrast and color.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6451.JPG 
Views:	23 
Size:	585.7 KB 
ID:	21707 afraid for contrast/backlit.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6553-2.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	726.8 KB 
ID:	21708 contrast especially .

    Thank you in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko
    1. ok
    2. borderline dark/oversharpened
    3-4 ok

  6. #306
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. ok
    2. borderline dark/oversharpened
    3-4 ok
    Thanks a lot Dana.
    1,3 and 4 are in the queue.

    Five new ones for pre-screen/advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6211-2.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	680.0 KB 
ID:	21931 re-edit of this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7115393

    And four from a trip to Cologne last weekend.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0147.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	21932
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6762.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	21933
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6836.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	21934 afraid for backlit on this one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0175.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	795.5 KB 
ID:	21935

    Thank you in advance

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

  7. #307
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana.
    1,3 and 4 are in the queue.

    Five new ones for pre-screen/advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6211-2.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	680.0 KB 
ID:	21931 re-edit of this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7115393

    And four from a trip to Cologne last weekend.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0147.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	21932
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6762.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	21933
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6836.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	21934 afraid for backlit on this one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0175.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	795.5 KB 
ID:	21935

    Thank you in advance

    Best Regards,

    Wilko
    1. borderline contrast
    2-5 borderline soft; 4 almost backlit

  8. #308
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline contrast
    2-5 borderline soft; 4 almost backlit
    OK, Thanks Dana,

    Reworked versions (other snaps, but same aircraft) on TK en SU. of 2,3, and 5.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6761.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	22059
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0151.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.23 MB 
ID:	22060
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0175-2.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.27 MB 
ID:	22061

    And two others.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0116-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	915.1 KB 
ID:	22062
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6682.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.42 MB 
ID:	22063

    afraid for sharpness on all of them.

    Thnx in Advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

  9. #309
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    OK, Thanks Dana,

    Reworked versions (other snaps, but same aircraft) on TK en SU. of 2,3, and 5.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6761.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	22059
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0151.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.23 MB 
ID:	22060
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0175-2.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.27 MB 
ID:	22061

    And two others.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0116-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	915.1 KB 
ID:	22062
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6682.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.42 MB 
ID:	22063

    afraid for sharpness on all of them.

    Thnx in Advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko
    Horizon on the last two maybe borderline (CCW/CW respectively), but otherwise they look ok.

  10. #310
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Horizon on the last two maybe borderline (CCW/CW respectively), but otherwise they look ok.
    Thanks a lot Dana.

    Will try at least the first Three.

    Could you (or someone else ofcourse pre-screen these images?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0095-2.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.28 MB 
ID:	22192 I want to upload it with the info of the UPS Boeing 757F, but not sure if this crop works and if the FedeX is too distracting .In that case I have another edit.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0095-3.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	851.8 KB 
ID:	22193 Now it tuns more like an airport overview, but too me it doesn't work. If the first one is good enough/fixable ,you can ignore this one.

    And

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6833.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	695.4 KB 
ID:	22194 other snap as earlier in this thread, but still unsure about backlit/contrast/ sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6824.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.05 MB 
ID:	22195 especially horizon.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6779.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	703.0 KB 
ID:	22196

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko.

  11. #311
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana.

    Will try at least the first Three.

    Could you (or someone else ofcourse pre-screen these images?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0095-2.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.28 MB 
ID:	22192 I want to upload it with the info of the UPS Boeing 757F, but not sure if this crop works and if the FedeX is too distracting .In that case I have another edit.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0095-3.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	851.8 KB 
ID:	22193 Now it tuns more like an airport overview, but too me it doesn't work. If the first one is good enough/fixable ,you can ignore this one.

    And

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6833.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	695.4 KB 
ID:	22194 other snap as earlier in this thread, but still unsure about backlit/contrast/ sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6824.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.05 MB 
ID:	22195 especially horizon.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6779.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	703.0 KB 
ID:	22196

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko.
    1-2 Probably go with the second of the two due to the crop at the top rather than the bottom, but both kind of borderline.
    3 & 5 ok
    4 might need a little CCW rotation

  12. #312
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1-2 Probably go with the second of the two due to the crop at the top rather than the bottom, but both kind of borderline.
    3 & 5 ok
    4 might need a little CCW rotation
    Thanks a lot Dana.

    Got the German Air Force A321 rejected yesterday. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7160479

    Dust spots were pretty clear indeed, little too much soft spots indeed, but totally don't understand the contrast point tbh.

    Made a re-edit with a tiny different crop, to pull out the spot on top of the building.
    Very curious what you think about it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6833-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	998.9 KB 
ID:	22572

    Also tried a different kind of an airport overview as I wasn't convinced about the previous two.
    Can't use the Egypt A330 as I got that one already accepted.
    thoughts would be appreciated on this one.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0140.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	22573

    And two others for pre-screen.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6702.JPG 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	22574 exposure and contrast
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0200.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	702.2 KB 
ID:	22575 low light shot with different settings as I use normally.

    Thank iyou in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

  13. #313
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana.

    Got the German Air Force A321 rejected yesterday. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7160479

    Dust spots were pretty clear indeed, little too much soft spots indeed, but totally don't understand the contrast point tbh.

    Made a re-edit with a tiny different crop, to pull out the spot on top of the building.
    Very curious what you think about it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6833-2.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	998.9 KB 
ID:	22572

    Also tried a different kind of an airport overview as I wasn't convinced about the previous two.
    Can't use the Egypt A330 as I got that one already accepted.
    thoughts would be appreciated on this one.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0140.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	22573

    And two others for pre-screen.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6702.JPG 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	22574 exposure and contrast
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0200.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	702.2 KB 
ID:	22575 low light shot with different settings as I use normally.

    Thank iyou in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko
    1. borderline overexposed
    2. does not qualify as airport overview
    3. ok
    4. borderline color (red)

  14. #314
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline overexposed
    2. does not qualify as airport overview
    3. ok
    4. borderline color (red)
    Thanks a lot Dana.
    I would appreciate advice on these three.

    Reworked #4 from the previous post but still not sure about it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0200-2.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	737.8 KB 
ID:	22747

    Tried to solve the issues from this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7174385, but still unsure about color and also about sharpness on this one.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0041-3.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	853.7 KB 
ID:	22748

    And another one with contrast issues I think so. (long focal length and pretty heavy crop)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6510-2.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	677.7 KB 
ID:	22749

    Thanks in advance.

  15. #315
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana.
    I would appreciate advice on these three.

    Reworked #4 from the previous post but still not sure about it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0200-2.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	737.8 KB 
ID:	22747

    Tried to solve the issues from this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7174385, but still unsure about color and also about sharpness on this one.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0041-3.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	853.7 KB 
ID:	22748

    And another one with contrast issues I think so. (long focal length and pretty heavy crop)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6510-2.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	677.7 KB 
ID:	22749

    Thanks in advance.
    1-2 ok
    3 borderline dark/contrast

  16. #316
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1-2 ok
    3 borderline dark/contrast
    Thank you Dana as always for your thoughts.
    1 and 2 are in the queue.

    Pre-screen/advice would be appreciated for five shots taken in challenging conditions.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0324.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	479.2 KB 
ID:	22908 Off course contrast shall be a big issue, tried to stretch the histogram as far as possible.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0420.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	699.5 KB 
ID:	22909 also afraid for contrast. Also color and sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0442.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	802.0 KB 
ID:	22910 Especially color.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0448.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	610.5 KB 
ID:	22911 Especially exposure/contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0516.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	818.1 KB 
ID:	22912 everything.

    The last three were taken during (almost ) sunrise.

    Thanks in advance.

  17. #317
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thank you Dana as always for your thoughts.
    1 and 2 are in the queue.

    Pre-screen/advice would be appreciated for five shots taken in challenging conditions.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0324.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	479.2 KB 
ID:	22908 Off course contrast shall be a big issue, tried to stretch the histogram as far as possible.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0420.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	699.5 KB 
ID:	22909 also afraid for contrast. Also color and sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0442.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	802.0 KB 
ID:	22910 Especially color.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0448.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	610.5 KB 
ID:	22911 Especially exposure/contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0516.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	818.1 KB 
ID:	22912 everything.

    The last three were taken during (almost ) sunrise.

    Thanks in advance.
    1. contrast. don't think this one is fixable
    2-4 ok
    5. borderline dark

  18. #318
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. contrast. don't think this one is fixable
    2-4 ok
    5. borderline dark
    Thanks a lot Dana,

    The last four will enter the queue. The Korean already did with some increased exposure.

    Any thoughts on these three would be appreciated.

    Concerned about sharpness, contrast, exposure and color.
    All also taken around sunset.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0440.JPG 
Views:	12 
Size:	680.0 KB 
ID:	22979
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0455.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	766.5 KB 
ID:	22980
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0488-3.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	825.0 KB 
ID:	22981

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

  19. #319
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana,

    The last four will enter the queue. The Korean already did with some increased exposure.

    Any thoughts on these three would be appreciated.

    Concerned about sharpness, contrast, exposure and color.
    All also taken around sunset.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0440.JPG 
Views:	12 
Size:	680.0 KB 
ID:	22979
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0455.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	766.5 KB 
ID:	22980
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0488-3.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	825.0 KB 
ID:	22981

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.
    1-2 borderline soft
    3 dark

  20. #320
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1-2 borderline soft
    3 dark
    Thanks a lot Dana.
    I would like advice about five (almost) new ones.

    At first about a re-edit of #2 from the previous post.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0455-2.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	699.6 KB 
ID:	23046 Still concerned about overall quality. on this one.

    At second about a re-edit from this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7194735
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0351.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	919.0 KB 
ID:	23047
    Took another from this batch but do also have doubt about this one.

    And at last three ones from yesterday.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0616-2.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	687.3 KB 
ID:	23048
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0709.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	514.2 KB 
ID:	23049
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0733.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	594.1 KB 
ID:	23050

    All with long focal lenghts so concerned about contrast and heat haze on all of them. On the CX I have also doubt about the tail being backlit.

    Thanks in Advance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •