Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 198

Thread: wkd001- Editing advice

  1. #121
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey,
    No Problem, glad to hear that .



    #1 borderline backlit IMO as the tail is completely in shadow but otherwise OK (may another screener disagree, either positive or negative)
    #2 too high in frame
    #3 should be OK

    Have a good Night.
    Thanks a lot Julian,

    Xiamen is in the queue, the Cathay will remain personal as an earler attempt with something similar fell down the wrong way.

    Made a new edit of the Easyjet. thought I couldn't crop out the aircraft in the left underneath in mu first attempt, but Apparantly I could ( No cloning!!!)

    This is it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0565-2.JPG 
Views:	61 
Size:	551.9 KB 
ID:	13949

    And four more for check-up.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4797.JPG 
Views:	62 
Size:	1.28 MB 
ID:	13950
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772.JPG 
Views:	63 
Size:	453.5 KB 
ID:	13951
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0874.JPG 
Views:	23 
Size:	840.4 KB 
ID:	13952
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4739.JPG 
Views:	63 
Size:	666.2 KB 
ID:	13953

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko

  2. #122
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Julian,

    Xiamen is in the queue, the Cathay will remain personal as an earler attempt with something similar fell down the wrong way.

    Made a new edit of the Easyjet. thought I couldn't crop out the aircraft in the left underneath in mu first attempt, but Apparantly I could ( No cloning!!!)

    This is it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0565-2.JPG 
Views:	61 
Size:	551.9 KB 
ID:	13949

    And four more for check-up.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4797.JPG 
Views:	62 
Size:	1.28 MB 
ID:	13950
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772.JPG 
Views:	63 
Size:	453.5 KB 
ID:	13951
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0874.JPG 
Views:	23 
Size:	840.4 KB 
ID:	13952
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4739.JPG 
Views:	63 
Size:	666.2 KB 
ID:	13953

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko
    1. borderline soft
    3-4 borderline contrast (too low)
    2 & 5 the sky seems darker towards the top of the frame. did you use a filter?

  3. #123
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline soft
    3-4 borderline contrast (too low)
    2 & 5 the sky seems darker towards the top of the frame. did you use a filter?
    Thanks Dana.
    Yes, 2 and 5 were shot with a camera with filter. If it's a problem I won't upload them.

    3 an 4 again with increased contrast. (adding contrast to the Orange Pride was difficult, gave it a try , think it's under exposed now).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772.JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	462.8 KB 
ID:	13966
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0874.JPG 
Views:	8 
Size:	550.1 KB 
ID:	13967

    Three other ones also.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0763.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	625.9 KB 
ID:	13968
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0848.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	609.0 KB 
ID:	13969
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0935.JPG 
Views:	8 
Size:	792.6 KB 
ID:	13970

    Will include the Easyjet with additional layer of sharpness.

    Thanks in advance.

    Wilko

  4. #124
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks Dana.
    Yes, 2 and 5 were shot with a camera with filter. If it's a problem I won't upload them.
    If it was a physical filter (i.e. polarizer) then leave a note with the uploads. We allow physical filters, but not digital ones to recreate that darkened sky look.

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    3 an 4 again with increased contrast. (adding contrast to the Orange Pride was difficult, gave it a try , think it's under exposed now).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772.JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	462.8 KB 
ID:	13966
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0874.JPG 
Views:	8 
Size:	550.1 KB 
ID:	13967

    Three other ones also.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0763.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	625.9 KB 
ID:	13968
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0848.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	609.0 KB 
ID:	13969
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0935.JPG 
Views:	8 
Size:	792.6 KB 
ID:	13970

    Will include the Easyjet with additional layer of sharpness.

    Thanks in advance.

    Wilko
    1-2 borderline for color (cyan/blue cast) and contrast
    3-4 also slightly blue & dark/flat, but only need minor adjustments
    5 should be ok

  5. #125
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    If it was a physical filter (i.e. polarizer) then leave a note with the uploads. We allow physical filters, but not digital ones to recreate that darkened sky look.

    OK, don't even know how to use filters in Lightroom. Will do my best to keep an eye on it. Don't think I will upload the BA as I had to correct the exposure/highlights heavily and it could turn into overprocessed.

    1-2 borderline for color (cyan/blue cast) and contrast
    3-4 also slightly blue & dark/flat, but only need minor adjustments
    5 should be ok
    Thanks Dana.

    1-4 giving me a whole lot of trouble. Especially removing blue cast and right contrast.
    Made new edits, but I think the're even worse.
    Will show three.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0874-2.JPG 
Views:	50 
Size:	498.2 KB 
ID:	14015
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772-2.JPG 
Views:	51 
Size:	564.7 KB 
ID:	14016
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0848-2.JPG 
Views:	59 
Size:	445.8 KB 
ID:	14017

    And two others.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0684.JPG 
Views:	54 
Size:	732.4 KB 
ID:	14018
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0918.JPG 
Views:	53 
Size:	671.1 KB 
ID:	14019

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko

  6. #126
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks Dana.

    1-4 giving me a whole lot of trouble. Especially removing blue cast and right contrast.
    Made new edits, but I think the're even worse.
    Will show three.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0874-2.JPG 
Views:	50 
Size:	498.2 KB 
ID:	14015
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772-2.JPG 
Views:	51 
Size:	564.7 KB 
ID:	14016
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0848-2.JPG 
Views:	59 
Size:	445.8 KB 
ID:	14017

    And two others.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0684.JPG 
Views:	54 
Size:	732.4 KB 
ID:	14018
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0918.JPG 
Views:	53 
Size:	671.1 KB 
ID:	14019

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko
    1. borderline soft/contrast
    2-3 borderline dark
    4. borderline soft/contrast
    5. ok

  7. #127
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline soft/contrast
    2-3 borderline dark
    4. borderline soft/contrast
    5. ok
    Thanks a lot Dana,

    Added exposure to the AA and the Norwegian.
    Do I have to use special scheme to the Norwegian as there are also titles on the Fuseelage,
    Three new ones for advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0638.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.17 MB 
ID:	14072
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1007.JPG 
Views:	55 
Size:	693.3 KB 
ID:	14073
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1074.JPG 
Views:	56 
Size:	558.5 KB 
ID:	14074

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko

  8. #128
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana,

    Added exposure to the AA and the Norwegian.
    Do I have to use special scheme to the Norwegian as there are also titles on the Fuseelage,
    Three new ones for advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0638.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.17 MB 
ID:	14072
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1007.JPG 
Views:	55 
Size:	693.3 KB 
ID:	14073
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1074.JPG 
Views:	56 
Size:	558.5 KB 
ID:	14074

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko
    First two are too high in the frame.

  9. #129
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    First two are too high in the frame.
    Thanks a lot Dana.

    The Garuda and a re-edit of the Atlas are in the queue.

    More for advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0998-2.JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	14132
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0991.JPG 
Views:	7 
Size:	762.8 KB 
ID:	14136

    Apparently heathaze. I want to know if it's at least Borderline.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1011.JPG 
Views:	50 
Size:	812.4 KB 
ID:	14133
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1022.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	660.1 KB 
ID:	14134
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1050.JPG 
Views:	59 
Size:	968.0 KB 
ID:	14135

    All difficult light conditions. Etihad Cargo might be too soft as well.

    And maybe other issues,

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko

  10. #130
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana.

    The Garuda and a re-edit of the Atlas are in the queue.

    More for advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0998-2.JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	14132
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0991.JPG 
Views:	7 
Size:	762.8 KB 
ID:	14136

    Apparently heathaze. I want to know if it's at least Borderline.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1011.JPG 
Views:	50 
Size:	812.4 KB 
ID:	14133
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1022.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	660.1 KB 
ID:	14134
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1050.JPG 
Views:	59 
Size:	968.0 KB 
ID:	14135

    All difficult light conditions. Etihad Cargo might be too soft as well.

    And maybe other issues,

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko
    1-2 ok
    3. borderline contrast
    4. ok
    5. soft (tail, borderline contrast)

  11. #131
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    More for advice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0998-2.JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	14132
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0991.JPG 
Views:	7 
Size:	762.8 KB 
ID:	14136

    Apparently heathaze. I want to know if it's at least Borderline.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1011.JPG 
Views:	50 
Size:	812.4 KB 
ID:	14133
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1022.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	660.1 KB 
ID:	14134
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1050.JPG 
Views:	59 
Size:	968.0 KB 
ID:	14135

    All difficult light conditions. Etihad Cargo might be too soft as well.

    And maybe other issues,

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

    Wilko
    no. 1 looks a bit noisy, no 2 is rather dark imo, tad noisy and unleveled, no.3 looks somewhat noisy, no. 4 looks acceptable, no. 5 soft and rather harsh contrast (darks too dark, highlight overexposed)

  12. #132
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdeboer View Post
    no. 1 looks a bit noisy, no 2 is rather dark imo, tad noisy and unleveled, no.3 looks somewhat noisy, no. 4 looks acceptable, no. 5 soft and rather harsh contrast (darks too dark, highlight overexposed)
    Dana and Pamela, thank you both.
    A little distracting with different opinions.
    Conclude of all is that at least 5 shall remain personal. 1 and 4 are in the queue.

    Question about this reject..https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413636
    Found the garbage myself (different things)
    About the colour. Is this wat you call cyan cast? Or is it different. Only for learning for myself and to act accordingly.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko

  13. #133
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post

    Question about this reject..https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413636
    Found the garbage myself (different things)
    About the colour. Is this wat you call cyan cast? Or is it different. Only for learning for myself and to act accordingly.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko
    Looks a little green to me.

  14. #134
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Looks a little green to me.
    OK. Dana.

    Regarding this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413636
    Tried to remove the cast... Removing the garbage was a little difficult due to the dust in a corner.. Gave it a try.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1074-2.JPG 
Views:	4 
Size:	502.8 KB 
ID:	14287

    Regarding this reject...https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417
    Made a new edit. Gave it CCW.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4681-2.JPG 
Views:	4 
Size:	608.3 KB 
ID:	14288

    And three others...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1026.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	853.4 KB 
ID:	14289
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4774.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	689.1 KB 
ID:	14290
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1054.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	603.5 KB 
ID:	14291 Tail softnes again IMO. Is it fixable?

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko

  15. #135
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    OK. Dana.

    Regarding this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413636
    Tried to remove the cast... Removing the garbage was a little difficult due to the dust in a corner.. Gave it a try.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1074-2.JPG 
Views:	4 
Size:	502.8 KB 
ID:	14287

    Regarding this reject...https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417
    Made a new edit. Gave it CCW.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4681-2.JPG 
Views:	4 
Size:	608.3 KB 
ID:	14288

    And three others...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1026.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	853.4 KB 
ID:	14289
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4774.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	689.1 KB 
ID:	14290
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1054.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	603.5 KB 
ID:	14291 Tail softnes again IMO. Is it fixable?

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards,

    Wilko
    1. tail slightly soft, but otherwise ok
    2-4 ok for me
    5. borderline soft, but passable for me

  16. #136
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. tail slightly soft, but otherwise ok
    2-4 ok for me
    5. borderline soft, but passable for me
    Thanks Dana for your words.

    Received this reject for horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423540

    Appealed on it, because there is a pole left to the main gear in the centre of the photo. Compared to that one, it's absolutely level.
    Got a reject at the appeal, In the comment, I was told, that the vericals on the tiled wall are leaning to the right.
    This doesn't fit well to well to me, as the tiled wall is running away to left in this angle and so not a good reference for leveling photos here.
    Got also photos accepted from the same spot where the verticals on this wall are also not level.
    Here are two examples.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8858232
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8864994

    Best regards,

    Wilko

  17. #137
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks Dana for your words.

    Received this reject for horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423540

    Appealed on it, because there is a pole left to the main gear in the centre of the photo. Compared to that one, it's absolutely level.
    Got a reject at the appeal, In the comment, I was told, that the vericals on the tiled wall are leaning to the right.
    This doesn't fit well to well to me, as the tiled wall is running away to left in this angle and so not a good reference for leveling photos here.
    Got also photos accepted from the same spot where the verticals on this wall are also not level.
    Here are two examples.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8858232
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8864994

    Best regards,

    Wilko
    Can't really help you on this one, image level is acceptable for me.

  18. #138
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Can't really help you on this one, image level is acceptable for me.
    Thank you for your words Dana,

    Is there something to do about this?. Just to re-upload and send a message to the screening team for example?
    I guess that will make a mistake, as I read the team doesn't really like that.
    Or is there a better solution. Won't re-edit as I expect another horizon reject in that case.
    Can't appeal again ofcourse, but this really doesn't fit well to me.
    For example. This one is my mistake. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417.
    As I used a pole visible behind the landing gear for leveling .I did that wrong, costing me a reject.
    On the CZ 777F, the pole I used is absolutely level, even verified with the horizon tool at the website.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

  19. #139
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thank you for your words Dana,

    Is there something to do about this?. Just to re-upload and send a message to the screening team for example?
    I guess that will make a mistake, as I read the team doesn't really like that.
    Or is there a better solution. Won't re-edit as I expect another horizon reject in that case.
    Can't appeal again ofcourse, but this really doesn't fit well to me.
    For example. This one is my mistake. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417.
    As I used a pole visible behind the landing gear for leveling .I did that wrong, costing me a reject.
    On the CZ 777F, the pole I used is absolutely level, even verified with the horizon tool at the website.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko
    Not much. Just give it a little rotation and put it back in the queue.

  20. #140
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Not much. Just give it a little rotation and put it back in the queue.
    My mistake Dana, my apologies.
    A re-edit of the China Eastern A330 is already in te queue.
    Still dubbing what to do with the CZ777F....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •