Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. tail slightly soft, but otherwise ok
    2-4 ok for me
    5. borderline soft, but passable for me
    Thanks Dana for your words.

    Received this reject for horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423540

    Appealed on it, because there is a pole left to the main gear in the centre of the photo. Compared to that one, it's absolutely level.
    Got a reject at the appeal, In the comment, I was told, that the vericals on the tiled wall are leaning to the right.
    This doesn't fit well to well to me, as the tiled wall is running away to left in this angle and so not a good reference for leveling photos here.
    Got also photos accepted from the same spot where the verticals on this wall are also not level.
    Here are two examples.

    Entering taxiway Victor and also received the renewed colorscheme of the airline. PH-BXC. Boeing 737-8K2. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Entering taxiway Victor.. PH-BHN. Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Best regards,

    Wilko

    Comment


    • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      Thanks Dana for your words.

      Received this reject for horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423540

      Appealed on it, because there is a pole left to the main gear in the centre of the photo. Compared to that one, it's absolutely level.
      Got a reject at the appeal, In the comment, I was told, that the vericals on the tiled wall are leaning to the right.
      This doesn't fit well to well to me, as the tiled wall is running away to left in this angle and so not a good reference for leveling photos here.
      Got also photos accepted from the same spot where the verticals on this wall are also not level.
      Here are two examples.

      Entering taxiway Victor and also received the renewed colorscheme of the airline. PH-BXC. Boeing 737-8K2. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

      Entering taxiway Victor.. PH-BHN. Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


      Best regards,

      Wilko
      Can't really help you on this one, image level is acceptable for me.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        Can't really help you on this one, image level is acceptable for me.
        Thank you for your words Dana,

        Is there something to do about this?. Just to re-upload and send a message to the screening team for example?
        I guess that will make a mistake, as I read the team doesn't really like that.
        Or is there a better solution. Won't re-edit as I expect another horizon reject in that case.
        Can't appeal again ofcourse, but this really doesn't fit well to me.
        For example. This one is my mistake. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417.
        As I used a pole visible behind the landing gear for leveling .I did that wrong, costing me a reject.
        On the CZ 777F, the pole I used is absolutely level, even verified with the horizon tool at the website.

        Best Regards,

        Wilko

        Comment


        • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
          Thank you for your words Dana,

          Is there something to do about this?. Just to re-upload and send a message to the screening team for example?
          I guess that will make a mistake, as I read the team doesn't really like that.
          Or is there a better solution. Won't re-edit as I expect another horizon reject in that case.
          Can't appeal again ofcourse, but this really doesn't fit well to me.
          For example. This one is my mistake. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417.
          As I used a pole visible behind the landing gear for leveling .I did that wrong, costing me a reject.
          On the CZ 777F, the pole I used is absolutely level, even verified with the horizon tool at the website.

          Best Regards,

          Wilko
          Not much. Just give it a little rotation and put it back in the queue.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            Not much. Just give it a little rotation and put it back in the queue.
            My mistake Dana, my apologies.
            A re-edit of the China Eastern A330 is already in te queue.
            Still dubbing what to do with the CZ777F....

            Comment


            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
              My mistake Dana, my apologies.
              A re-edit of the China Eastern A330 is already in te queue.
              Still dubbing what to do with the CZ777F....
              I know, that's what I was referring to.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                I know, that's what I was referring to.
                OK Dana thank you. I want to close this case also....

                After another check and still doubts I gave the CZ 777F a try...Gave a slight touch of CCW.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4679-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	770.0 KB
ID:	1022878

                And four more....

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4718-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	770.0 KB
ID:	1022879
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4769.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	787.1 KB
ID:	1022880
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1016.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	436.0 KB
ID:	1022881
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1043.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	944.1 KB
ID:	1022882

                Thanks in advance.

                Best Regards,

                Wilko

                Comment


                • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                  OK Dana thank you. I want to close this case also....

                  After another check and still doubts I gave the CZ 777F a try...Gave a slight touch of CCW.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]14372[/ATTACH]

                  And four more....

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]14373[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]14374[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]14375[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]14376[/ATTACH]

                  Thanks in advance.

                  Best Regards,

                  Wilko
                  Quality/level looks fine on all of them to me. Were you using a polarizer on #2-3? The sky darkens noticeably towards the top of the frame, especially on the -47.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Quality/level looks fine on all of them to me. Were you using a polarizer on #2-3? The sky darkens noticeably towards the top of the frame, especially on the -47.
                    Apologies for the late reply. Very busy with other things also, but thank you for your words Dana.
                    1-3 Were all also taken with a physical filter on my camera. From the same session as some photos posted earlier in this thread.
                    It did work on most of the photos but to me not on the 747's. The KLM 747 looks indeed overprocessed although it is not.
                    Putted the Delta already in the queue, but afraid the 747 won't make it. Any advice?
                    I also reported the use of the filter with the uploads of this session to the screeners like you asked earlier.

                    Another question.

                    Received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6433985

                    Made a new edit.
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1026-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	761.2 KB
ID:	1022980

                    Not sure about it. I do have a second one.
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1027.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	629.7 KB
ID:	1022981

                    I want to know which one has the best chance.

                    And two others.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1019.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	715.6 KB
ID:	1022982
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0547.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	799.5 KB
ID:	1022983

                    Thanks in advance.

                    Best regards,

                    Wilko
                    Last edited by wkd001; 2018-03-23, 13:38. Reason: forgot things to mention

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                      Apologies for the late reply. Very busy with other things also, but thank you for your words Dana.
                      1-3 Were all also taken with a physical filter on my camera. From the same session as some photos posted earlier in this thread.
                      It did work on most of the photos but to me not on the 747's. The KLM 747 looks indeed overprocessed although it is not.
                      Putted the Delta already in the queue, but afraid the 747 won't make it. Any advice?
                      I also reported the use of the filter with the uploads of this session to the screeners like you asked earlier.

                      Another question.

                      Received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6433985

                      Made a new edit.
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]14510[/ATTACH]

                      Not sure about it. I do have a second one.
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]14511[/ATTACH]

                      I want to know which one has the best chance.

                      And two others.

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]14512[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]14513[/ATTACH]

                      Thanks in advance.

                      Best regards,

                      Wilko
                      All would be acceptable for me.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        All would be acceptable for me.
                        Thank you again for your time Dana.
                        2,3 and 4 are in the queue...

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1085.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	610.8 KB
ID:	1023037

                        Does this need nightshot for uploading??? Taken late at the day, but not at the end...
                        I think there are more issues, but I can't really point them...

                        And two more for advice...
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0886.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	700.0 KB
ID:	1023038
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0955.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	405.2 KB
ID:	1023039

                        Best Regards,
                        Wilko

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                          Thank you again for your time Dana.
                          2,3 and 4 are in the queue...

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]14598[/ATTACH]

                          Does this need nightshot for uploading??? Taken late at the day, but not at the end...
                          I think there are more issues, but I can't really point them...

                          And two more for advice...
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]14599[/ATTACH]
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]14600[/ATTACH]

                          Best Regards,
                          Wilko
                          1: slightly soft and leaning to the left. If you correct this and upload it, I suggest you select Night Shot and leave a remark to the screener, that you took it in the late afternoon
                          2, 3: OK for me
                          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                            1: slightly soft and leaning to the left. If you correct this and upload it, I suggest you select Night Shot and leave a remark to the screener, that you took it in the late afternoon
                            2, 3: OK for me
                            Thank you for your answers Gerardo.
                            Corrected the Easyjet and will upload it with the comment following your advice.

                            Five for advice.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7438.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	958.1 KB
ID:	1023069

                            Contrast shall definitely be an issue. Want to know if it's maybe borderline.
                            Do also have doubts about centering and horizon.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7367.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	746.2 KB
ID:	1023070
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0783.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	516.0 KB
ID:	1023071
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0895.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	515.1 KB
ID:	1023072 should not be similar compared to the one I have in the DB.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0963.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	496.3 KB
ID:	1023073

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                              Thank you for your answers Gerardo.
                              Corrected the Easyjet and will upload it with the comment following your advice.

                              Five for advice.

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14654[/ATTACH]

                              Contrast shall definitely be an issue. Want to know if it's maybe borderline.
                              Do also have doubts about centering and horizon.

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14655[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14656[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14657[/ATTACH] should not be similar compared to the one I have in the DB.
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14658[/ATTACH]
                              1. dark, contrast. not borderline, will be rejected.
                              2. borderline soft
                              3-4 borderline contrast
                              5. soft

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                1. dark, contrast. not borderline, will be rejected.
                                2. borderline soft
                                3-4 borderline contrast
                                5. soft
                                Thanks Dana,

                                Will try nr 3 and maybe nr.2
                                1,4 and 5 will remain personal for various reasons.

                                Three new ones.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4674.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	755.5 KB
ID:	1023141
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4845.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	835.3 KB
ID:	1023142
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0906.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	532.9 KB
ID:	1023143

                                Thanks in Advance.

                                Best Regards.

                                Wilko

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X