Page 17 of 19 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 380

Thread: wkd001- Editing advice

  1. #321
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    1. borderline contrast
    2-3 ok
    4-5 borderline contrast

  2. #322
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline contrast
    2-3 ok
    4-5 borderline contrast
    Thank you Dana.

    Will try 2 and 3 and see what to do with 4 and 5. First remains personal.

    Don't know if this also belongs to the 24 hrs rule, if so answer tomorrow, but I think not as it's no pre-screen request.

    Got this one rejected yesterday for Blurry https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7199791.

    I'm dazed about it as I really don't know whats blurry on this one .

    Could someone explain to me please, or is appealing an idea.

    Thnx in advance.

  3. #323
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thank you Dana.

    Will try 2 and 3 and see what to do with 4 and 5. First remains personal.

    Don't know if this also belongs to the 24 hrs rule, if so answer tomorrow, but I think not as it's no pre-screen request.

    Got this one rejected yesterday for Blurry https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7199791.

    I'm dazed about it as I really don't know whats blurry on this one .

    Could someone explain to me please, or is appealing an idea.

    Thnx in advance.
    Don't think it's blurry, but there might be a little heat haze on the front half, or even just how you've sharpened it kind of gives it that appearance. If the full-size isn't actually blurry, maybe just try re-processing it.

  4. #324
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Don't think it's blurry, but there might be a little heat haze on the front half, or even just how you've sharpened it kind of gives it that appearance. If the full-size isn't actually blurry, maybe just try re-processing it.
    Thank you Dana for your thoughts.
    I checked the original and there is too much heat haze what I did miss apparently while editing it.
    So I won't spend any energy on it anymore.

    Could you (or someone else of course) give advice about these?
    All taken on a sunny, but windy and heat hazed day.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0543.JPG 
Views:	24 
Size:	553.2 KB 
ID:	23231
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0570.JPG 
Views:	20 
Size:	564.4 KB 
ID:	23232
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0643.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	406.9 KB 
ID:	23233
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772-2.JPG 
Views:	23 
Size:	789.8 KB 
ID:	23234

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards.

  5. #325
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thank you Dana for your thoughts.
    I checked the original and there is too much heat haze what I did miss apparently while editing it.
    So I won't spend any energy on it anymore.

    Could you (or someone else of course) give advice about these?
    All taken on a sunny, but windy and heat hazed day.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0543.JPG 
Views:	24 
Size:	553.2 KB 
ID:	23231
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0570.JPG 
Views:	20 
Size:	564.4 KB 
ID:	23232
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0643.JPG 
Views:	22 
Size:	406.9 KB 
ID:	23233
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0772-2.JPG 
Views:	23 
Size:	789.8 KB 
ID:	23234

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards.
    Contrast a bit harsh on all, and crop is pretty tight on the last one.

  6. #326
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Contrast a bit harsh on all, and crop is pretty tight on the last one.
    Thanks Dana, Will try 1-3 with some slight rework as original crop on #4 is also questionable,

    If anyone has time to check/pre-screen these it would be appreciated.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0771.JPG 
Views:	18 
Size:	971.9 KB 
ID:	23415 Epecially exposure and contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0576.JPG 
Views:	18 
Size:	559.9 KB 
ID:	23416 curious if it's even sharp....I think it is, but not sure.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0554.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	541.0 KB 
ID:	23417 sharpness and contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6193.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	641.8 KB 
ID:	23418 contrast
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6322.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	770.3 KB 
ID:	23419

    Thanks in Advance.

  7. #327
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks Dana, Will try 1-3 with some slight rework as original crop on #4 is also questionable,

    If anyone has time to check/pre-screen these it would be appreciated.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0771.JPG 
Views:	18 
Size:	971.9 KB 
ID:	23415 Epecially exposure and contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0576.JPG 
Views:	18 
Size:	559.9 KB 
ID:	23416 curious if it's even sharp....I think it is, but not sure.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0554.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	541.0 KB 
ID:	23417 sharpness and contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6193.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	641.8 KB 
ID:	23418 contrast
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6322.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	770.3 KB 
ID:	23419

    Thanks in Advance.
    1. yes, borderline contrast
    2-5 should be ok

  8. #328
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. yes, borderline contrast
    2-5 should be ok
    Thanks Dana,

    Should I select civil for the Dutch Police helicopter?
    I'm not used to uploading these?

    I do have another question.
    Yesterday I received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7220061 for the famous too much or too litlle contrast.
    I don't really understand this one and there was no explanation given.
    There was enough sunlight and I had the sun not ideal, but close to me.
    I could think two reasons.
    1- just the clouds and the almost white aircraft.
    2- not enough dark tones/shadows as there was also a small gap on the left side on the histogram I saw on the reject page.
    3- both of them ...

    Thanks in advance.

  9. #329
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Should I select civil for the Dutch Police helicopter?
    Yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    I do have another question.
    Yesterday I received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7220061 for the famous too much or too litlle contrast.
    I don't really understand this one and there was no explanation given.
    There was enough sunlight and I had the sun not ideal, but close to me.
    Contrast is a bit too harsh.

  10. #330
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes.



    Contrast is a bit too harsh.
    OK Dana,

    Could you be a litlle more specific, what's exactly too much in the contrast.
    Just for learning for myself.
    First time for me to have a reject for too much contrast.
    Think myself saturation, but absolutely not sure.

    Thanks in Advance.

  11. #331
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    OK Dana,

    Could you be a litlle more specific, what's exactly too much in the contrast.
    Just for learning for myself.
    First time for me to have a reject for too much contrast.
    Think myself saturation, but absolutely not sure.

    Thanks in Advance.
    Shadows too strong & highlights too bright.

  12. #332
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Shadows too strong & highlights too bright.
    OK, strange about the shadows as the left side of the he histogram does not close on the Delta. I assume, this is the same on the rejected CZ A330. (Can't provide the link on my mobile) Highlights too strong I understand on both. I will try to correct with reducing white tones and/or correcting exposure. Pulling down highlights causes halos.

  13. #333
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Hello,

    I would like to receive pre-screen/advice on these five photos.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0765.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	600.3 KB 
ID:	23668 Afraid for the contrast/ given in by latest two rejects I received.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0798.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	675.2 KB 
ID:	23669 Little afraid for heathaze of this one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0842.JPG 
Views:	11 
Size:	628.3 KB 
ID:	23670 Overall quality.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0860.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	645.4 KB 
ID:	23671 Especially centering. contrast and sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0942.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	540.2 KB 
ID:	23672 Especially sharpness.

    Thanks in advance.

  14. #334
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Hello,

    I would like to receive pre-screen/advice on these five photos.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0765.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	600.3 KB 
ID:	23668 Afraid for the contrast/ given in by latest two rejects I received.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0798.JPG 
Views:	17 
Size:	675.2 KB 
ID:	23669 Little afraid for heathaze of this one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0842.JPG 
Views:	11 
Size:	628.3 KB 
ID:	23670 Overall quality.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0860.JPG 
Views:	15 
Size:	645.4 KB 
ID:	23671 Especially centering. contrast and sharpness.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0942.JPG 
Views:	14 
Size:	540.2 KB 
ID:	23672 Especially sharpness.

    Thanks in advance.
    #2 should be ok; the others might have minor issues with softness and contrast, but nothing I think that would guarantee a rejection.

  15. #335
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    #2 should be ok; the others might have minor issues with softness and contrast, but nothing I think that would guarantee a rejection.
    Thank you Dana,

    Will try some of them as I'm not convinced by especially 3 and 4.

    I would like advice/prescreen about these five.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1091.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	859.1 KB 
ID:	23816 Especially sharpness/exposure/contrast (especially to the tail.)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1158.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	640.9 KB 
ID:	23817 exposure/contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1204.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	843.5 KB 
ID:	23818 exposure/contrast. Do have a darker version, but the histogram leans too far too the left imho on that one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1222.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	23819 crop/exposure ,contrast
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1383.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	812.0 KB 
ID:	23820 Contrast /exposure.

    Thanks in Advance.

  16. #336
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thank you Dana,

    Will try some of them as I'm not convinced by especially 3 and 4.

    I would like advice/prescreen about these five.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1091.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	859.1 KB 
ID:	23816 Especially sharpness/exposure/contrast (especially to the tail.)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1158.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	640.9 KB 
ID:	23817 exposure/contrast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1204.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	843.5 KB 
ID:	23818 exposure/contrast. Do have a darker version, but the histogram leans too far too the left imho on that one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1222.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	23819 crop/exposure ,contrast
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1383.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	812.0 KB 
ID:	23820 Contrast /exposure.

    Thanks in Advance.
    Think they would all be ok for me.

  17. #337
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Think they would all be ok for me.
    Thanks Dana,

    I will give them a try.

    I had this reject some time ago. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7239567. I think it's at least borderline as I see all the hard lines and most important details
    or am I thinking wrong?

    And another question.

    Is this one too similar Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1144.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	993.0 KB 
ID:	23864 comapred to this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9009117

    I know the angle is the same, but is the background different enough?

    Thanks in Advance.

  18. #338
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks Dana,

    I will give them a try.

    I had this reject some time ago. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7239567. I think it's at least borderline as I see all the hard lines and most important details
    or am I thinking wrong?
    I actually voted accept on that one, but was outvoted, so yeah, not much else to say.

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    And another question.

    Is this one too similar Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1144.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	993.0 KB 
ID:	23864 comapred to this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9009117
    Yes, similar.

  19. #339
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    I actually voted accept on that one, but was outvoted, so yeah, not much else to say.



    Yes, similar.
    Thanks a lot for the explanation and comment Dana. I move away from both.

    I would like advice/prescreen on five new images.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1081.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	633.0 KB 
ID:	24005 Not sure about sharpness/ blurred to the extra titles.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0464.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	898.4 KB 
ID:	24006 Contrast/exposure/horizon
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0471.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	896.6 KB 
ID:	24007 same as previous.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1559.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	949.8 KB 
ID:	24008 also these threeand heathaze.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1610.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	575.1 KB 
ID:	24009 exposure contrast.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

  20. #340
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wkd001 View Post
    Thanks a lot for the explanation and comment Dana. I move away from both.

    I would like advice/prescreen on five new images.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1081.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	633.0 KB 
ID:	24005 Not sure about sharpness/ blurred to the extra titles.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0464.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	898.4 KB 
ID:	24006 Contrast/exposure/horizon
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0471.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	896.6 KB 
ID:	24007 same as previous.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1559.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	949.8 KB 
ID:	24008 also these threeand heathaze.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1610.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	575.1 KB 
ID:	24009 exposure contrast.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.
    Quality looks fine to me for all of them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •