Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Centering is ok, don't think the quality is too bad.
    Thank you Dana, will think about uploading the new version of it as I'm not completely certain about it.

    Ran into another problem now,

    Got this one rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6191209

    However, tried to fix the mentioned points in it, but got another shot of the same aircraft seconds earlier.
    This is the re-edit of the reject
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9858.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.37 MB
ID:	1020331


    This the photo taken seconds earlier
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9857.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1020332


    Curious which one will stand a better chance.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      Thank you Dana, will think about uploading the new version of it as I'm not completely certain about it.

      Ran into another problem now,

      Got this one rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6191209

      However, tried to fix the mentioned points in it, but got another shot of the same aircraft seconds earlier.
      This is the re-edit of the reject
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]11429[/ATTACH]


      This the photo taken seconds earlier
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]11430[/ATTACH]


      Curious which one will stand a better chance.
      #1 looks better. The slightly chopped off wing on #2 is a killer.
      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
        #1 looks better. The slightly chopped off wing on #2 is a killer.
        Thank you for your quick answer, but in that case I want to know If I've fixed all the problems from the reject properly, especially the contrast.

        BTW, as all the screeners might have noticed, I want to keep all my requests, advices, and problems from myself in my own thread, also to try to help you to keep everything a little clear.

        Comment


        • #34
          Got another reject today, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6192633

          Didn't agree with it, so appealed on it but that was also rejected with a reason I didn't completely understand.
          Exposure was already on the border, but got the advice to work on the mid-tones.
          However, as I don't know how to do that in LR, I decided to pull up the shadows witt this result.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9859.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1020360



          Want to know if it stands a chance know.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
            Got another reject today, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6192633

            Didn't agree with it, so appealed on it but that was also rejected with a reason I didn't completely understand.
            Exposure was already on the border, but got the advice to work on the mid-tones.
            However, as I don't know how to do that in LR, I decided to pull up the shadows witt this result.
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]11459[/ATTACH]



            Want to know if it stands a chance know.
            Probably ok now, though seems a bit yellow.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              Probably ok now, though seems a bit yellow.
              Could add a little more exposure by toying with shadows and blacks.
              There was a little hue in the photo indeed, but I couldn't describe it as yellow. For safety, I desaturated the yellow tones a little.
              The result is in the queue.

              Want to offer a some more for pre-screening.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4502.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	984.5 KB
ID:	1020387
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4532.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1020388
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9646.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	580.6 KB
ID:	1020389
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8543.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	819.2 KB
ID:	1020390
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8650.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	647.3 KB
ID:	1020391

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                Could add a little more exposure by toying with shadows and blacks.
                There was a little hue in the photo indeed, but I couldn't describe it as yellow. For safety, I desaturated the yellow tones a little.
                The result is in the queue.

                Want to offer a some more for pre-screening.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11486[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11487[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11488[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11489[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11490[/ATTACH]
                Quality looks fine on all of those.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  Quality looks fine on all of those.
                  Thanks again Dana.
                  I want to know if I have to use nightshot for nr.3. I guess I have to to nr. 5.

                  Got a couple more.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7901.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	66.9 KB
ID:	1020427
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8603.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	605.4 KB
ID:	1020428
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8287.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1020429

                  Note to nr.3 : It got rejected earlier today, due to underexposure and dust spot. Removed the bird that caused the dustspot, and increased the exposure by toying with shadows and blacks again.
                  As the light was pretty hard that day , I didn't want to increase whites and exposure by itself

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                    Thanks again Dana.
                    I want to know if I have to use nightshot for nr.3. I guess I have to to nr. 5.
                    You can use Night Shot for both.

                    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                    Got a couple more.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11529[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11530[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11531[/ATTACH]

                    Note to nr.3 : It got rejected earlier today, due to underexposure and dust spot. Removed the bird that caused the dustspot, and increased the exposure by toying with shadows and blacks again.
                    As the light was pretty hard that day , I didn't want to increase whites and exposure by itself
                    1. compression
                    2. soft, centering
                    3. ok

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      You can use Night Shot for both.



                      1. compression
                      2. soft, centering
                      3. ok
                      Thanks again Dana.

                      1. Will remain personal.
                      2. Will re-edit it when possible.
                      3. Is already in the queue.

                      Want to offer some more for pre-screen.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9858.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.38 MB
ID:	1020486
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0021.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	540.2 KB
ID:	1020487
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4530.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1020488
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9531.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	626.6 KB
ID:	1020489
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9640.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	987.9 KB
ID:	1020490

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                        Thanks again Dana.

                        1. Will remain personal.
                        2. Will re-edit it when possible.
                        3. Is already in the queue.

                        Want to offer some more for pre-screen.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]11593[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]11594[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]11595[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]11596[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]11597[/ATTACH]
                        1. ok
                        2. soft
                        3. ok
                        4. centering (too low), borderline color
                        5. ok

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          1. ok
                          2. soft
                          3. ok
                          4. centering (too low), borderline color
                          5. ok
                          Thank you again Dana.
                          1,3 and 5 are in the queue.

                          I want to offer some more for pre-screening.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0021.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	795.8 KB
ID:	1020552
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4507.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	980.1 KB
ID:	1020553
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4521.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1020554
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9970.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	795.9 KB
ID:	1020555
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9977.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1020556

                          note to nr 1. Re-edit of one which was too soft in pre-screening in this thread.
                          Not to nr 3. think it's not working ,but I want to know for sure.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                            Thank you again Dana.
                            1,3 and 5 are in the queue.

                            I want to offer some more for pre-screening.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]11672[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]11673[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]11674[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]11675[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]11676[/ATTACH]

                            note to nr 1. Re-edit of one which was too soft in pre-screening in this thread.
                            Not to nr 3. think it's not working ,but I want to know for sure.
                            1. Maybe another pass of sharpening
                            2. Horizon looks off
                            3. Dark/contrast, horizon
                            4. Looks ok
                            5. Horizon.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
                              1. Maybe another pass of sharpening
                              2. Horizon looks off
                              3. Dark/contrast, horizon
                              4. Looks ok
                              5. Horizon.
                              Thank you James.

                              I only want to know what you mean for nr. 2. Ain't the horizon level?
                              To me it seems Ok, but maybe I'm wrong. All the photos are taken on days with very variable weather.
                              Nr 3 will remain personal. Don't think I can get the aircraft brighter as the sky.

                              this are the re-edits of 1 and 3. (maybe 1 is blurred . Not sure about it at all.)
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0021.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	947.1 KB
ID:	1020571
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9977-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1020572

                              Got a couple more for pre-screen.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9756.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	630.7 KB
ID:	1020573
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9837.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	998.3 KB
ID:	1020574
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9874.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1,013.6 KB
ID:	1020575

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                                Thank you James.

                                I only want to know what you mean for nr. 2. Ain't the horizon level?
                                To me it seems Ok, but maybe I'm wrong. All the photos are taken on days with very variable weather.
                                Nr 3 will remain personal. Don't think I can get the aircraft brighter as the sky.

                                this are the re-edits of 1 and 3. (maybe 1 is blurred . Not sure about it at all.)
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11691[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11692[/ATTACH]

                                Got a couple more for pre-screen.

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11693[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11694[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]11695[/ATTACH]
                                All except the last one would be ok for me; the last one would be a contrast rejection if I screened it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X