Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    All except the last one would be ok for me; the last one would be a contrast rejection if I screened it.
    Thank you again Dana.

    Gave a re-edit to nr 5, just been testing with shadows and blacks coming to this... Think it's too much butI want to know for sure.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9874.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1020606

    Got also this one rejected today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6213963

    Made a re-edit of this, but do have doubts especially about the sharpening

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8543.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1020607

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      Thank you again Dana.

      Gave a re-edit to nr 5, just been testing with shadows and blacks coming to this... Think it's too much butI want to know for sure.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]11732[/ATTACH]

      Got also this one rejected today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6213963

      Made a re-edit of this, but do have doubts especially about the sharpening

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]11733[/ATTACH]
      Contrast and soft rejections respectively, for me.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        Contrast and soft rejections respectively, for me.
        Dana, after checking it again, the KLM wil remain personal as the aircraft is a tad darker as the background and he shadows were almost pushed tot the max in this case.
        The CargoLogic however, is a musthave for me,so I decided to give it another try (If this one fails, I'll try another one).

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8543-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.58 MB
ID:	1020652

        Aslo some more again for pre-screen.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8370.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	802.5 KB
ID:	1020653
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8851.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	777.9 KB
ID:	1020654
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8857-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	966.2 KB
ID:	1020655
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8861-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	928.6 KB
ID:	1020656

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
          Dana, after checking it again, the KLM wil remain personal as the aircraft is a tad darker as the background and he shadows were almost pushed tot the max in this case.
          The CargoLogic however, is a musthave for me,so I decided to give it another try (If this one fails, I'll try another one).

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]11782[/ATTACH]

          Aslo some more again for pre-screen.

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]11783[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]11784[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]11785[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]11786[/ATTACH]
          1. ok
          2. soft
          3. low in frame
          4. ok
          5. ok

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            1. ok
            2. soft
            3. low in frame
            4. ok
            5. ok
            Dana, Thanks Again.

            The Kuwait will remain personal as the original was also low in frame . (Don't expect to fix it properly.

            Re-editted the BA 787-9 from the previous post.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8370.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	978.9 KB
ID:	1020704

            I do have some more for pre-screen...

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4505.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	750.9 KB
ID:	1020707
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4508.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1020706
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8121.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	816.1 KB
ID:	1020709
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8772.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	858.2 KB
ID:	1020711

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
              Dana, Thanks Again.

              The Kuwait will remain personal as the original was also low in frame . (Don't expect to fix it properly.

              Re-editted the BA 787-9 from the previous post.

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11841[/ATTACH]

              I do have some more for pre-screen...

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11844[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11843[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11846[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11848[/ATTACH]
              Borderline soft for the first two, and the CX might need a little ccw, otherwise don't see any big problems.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Borderline soft for the first two, and the CX might need a little ccw, otherwise don't see any big problems.
                Thanks Dana.

                The CX is in the Queue with some ccw-rotation and a little additional sharpening.

                Gave also the BA 789 a little sharpening .As i'm still not completely sure about it, here it is again.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8370.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	1020850

                Some more for pre-screen.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8850.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	874.1 KB
ID:	1020851
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8751-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	966.5 KB
ID:	1020852
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9531-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	596.6 KB
ID:	1020853

                Final question for this moment. Got this one rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6227142
                Still struggling with this one. made another edit of it, but not sure at all if it's good.
                Couls anyone give me advice on it.?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9640-3.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	665.2 KB
ID:	1020854

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                  Thanks Dana.

                  The CX is in the Queue with some ccw-rotation and a little additional sharpening.

                  Gave also the BA 789 a little sharpening .As i'm still not completely sure about it, here it is again.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12003[/ATTACH]

                  Some more for pre-screen.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12004[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12005[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12006[/ATTACH]

                  Final question for this moment. Got this one rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6227142
                  Still struggling with this one. made another edit of it, but not sure at all if it's good.
                  Couls anyone give me advice on it.?

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12007[/ATTACH]
                  1. ok
                  2. borderline cut off/contrast
                  3. ok
                  4. borderline color
                  5. borderline contrast still. as with #4 there is a slight yellow/cyan cast.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    1. ok
                    2. borderline cut off/contrast
                    3. ok
                    4. borderline color
                    5. borderline contrast still. as with #4 there is a slight yellow/cyan cast.
                    Thaks again Dana.

                    BA en American 787's are in the queue.
                    Will give the Kuwait a try apparently,as I got a similar shot with an EK A380 in the database.

                    Here are nr 4 and 5 from the previous posts again.
                    Tried to fix them. But I think I'll let the Iberia go as the sky seems to be blown out to me right now...
                    The Dash gives me doubt about the contrast right now...

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9531-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	585.8 KB
ID:	1020959
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9640-3.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	664.5 KB
ID:	1020960

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                      Thaks again Dana.

                      BA en American 787's are in the queue.
                      Will give the Kuwait a try apparently,as I got a similar shot with an EK A380 in the database.

                      Here are nr 4 and 5 from the previous posts again.
                      Tried to fix them. But I think I'll let the Iberia go as the sky seems to be blown out to me right now...
                      The Dash gives me doubt about the contrast right now...

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]12115[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]12116[/ATTACH]
                      1 still borderline colour and IMO also soft
                      2 contrast, colour
                      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                        1 still borderline colour and IMO also soft
                        2 contrast, colour
                        Gerido, thanks for your time...Maybe I will try the Dash later once More. Won't spend any energy to the Iberia anymore.

                        Finally had the time and the opportunty to shoot some new material. I would like to offer five for pre-screen.
                        However as this was one of the few occasions to shoot for me in this conditions, I am curious...

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0086.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	870.5 KB
ID:	1020987
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0095.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	817.9 KB
ID:	1020988
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0136.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	761.4 KB
ID:	1020989
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0140.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	962.8 KB
ID:	1020990
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0157.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	832.5 KB
ID:	1020991

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          1) nice but maybe needs a little 0.2 CCW rotation to it
                          2)) ok
                          3) Great light but editing should improve the mid tones which are too dark
                          4) ok
                          5) ok

                          Regards
                          Alex

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                            1) nice but maybe needs a little 0.2 CCW rotation to it
                            2)) ok
                            3) Great light but editing should improve the mid tones which are too dark
                            4) ok
                            5) ok

                            Regards
                            Alex
                            A big Thank you to you Alex.

                            Gave the Air China Cargo 0.18 CCW (According my Lightroom), added a small amount of sharpness to it due to smaller crop and puted it in the queue.

                            The TAP gives me more problems at this moment.
                            Could toy with shadows and exposure and light although I think it's not enough
                            If I should add more, my histogram runs too far to the right in my opinion.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0136-3.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1021006

                            Also two more for pre-screen...

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0113.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	951.3 KB
ID:	1021007
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0128.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	994.1 KB
ID:	1021008

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                              A big Thank you to you Alex.

                              Gave the Air China Cargo 0.18 CCW (According my Lightroom), added a small amount of sharpness to it due to smaller crop and puted it in the queue.

                              The TAP gives me more problems at this moment.
                              Could toy with shadows and exposure and light although I think it's not enough
                              If I should add more, my histogram runs too far to the right in my opinion.

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12164[/ATTACH]

                              Also two more for pre-screen...

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12165[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12166[/ATTACH]
                              All are lacking contrast and have a slight green tint.

                              The first also has other issues like noise, and what looks like poor dust removal above the aircraft so would be rejected for manipulation/overprocessing.

                              Third has a visible dust spot.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                All are lacking contrast and have a slight green tint.

                                The first also has other issues like noise, and what looks like poor dust removal above the aircraft so would be rejected for manipulation/overprocessing.

                                Third has a visible dust spot.
                                Dana, thank you for your words. Do understand what you're saying, Don't know how to fix everything properly.
                                Having issues with several pre-screened and rejected shots with casts
                                Has it something to do with white balance.
                                With the KLM 789, could desaturate the green colours, and also gave it more contrast, but for my idea, it doesn't care
                                As earlier mentioned, i could play with midtones/shadows, but with the low sun, I don't think will help, because the histogram will fall too far to the right.
                                It's included again

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0113.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	989.1 KB
ID:	1021039

                                For comparison I include another KLM shot of a T7, (also for pre-screen) but I think it will suffer the same fate. It has for me the same story as the 789.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0152.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	930.6 KB
ID:	1021040

                                I will re-work the TK A320, later to remove the dust-spot properly I deerly forgot ( )and the other mentioned points.:
                                The TAP A319 will remain personal As I don't know how to remove the noise field properly in only lightroom. ( I don't have PS)
                                Attached Files

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X