Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    The 3 look acceptable to me

    Regards

    Alex

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
      The 3 look acceptable to me

      Regards

      Alex
      Alex, thank you for your answer.

      One final question before 2017 comes to a close.

      Does this one stands a chance?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0150-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1,009.2 KB
ID:	1021367

      Lots of doubt about the contrast and the exposure...
      If not it will remain personal. No problem.

      Final words for me this year to wish the entire JP-Team and all other people who are for some reason interested in my activities here all the best for 2018!!!

      Comment


      • #78
        i like it, nice light in the engines!

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
          i like it, nice light in the engines!
          Thank you Pamela !

          It's in the queue.

          All the best for 2018 for the entire team and everyone involved with JP on a certain way.

          Three for me with several doubts, from a short hour at runway 24 at Eham with various conditions.
          Want to offer them for pre-screen.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0239.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	576.6 KB
ID:	1021416
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0257.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	461.1 KB
ID:	1021417
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0266.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	585.6 KB
ID:	1021418

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
            Thank you Pamela !

            It's in the queue.

            All the best for 2018 for the entire team and everyone involved with JP on a certain way.

            Three for me with several doubts, from a short hour at runway 24 at Eham with various conditions.
            Want to offer them for pre-screen.

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12629[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12630[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12631[/ATTACH]
            1. ok
            2. too far
            3. soft

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
              Thank you Pamela !

              It's in the queue.

              All the best for 2018 for the entire team and everyone involved with JP on a certain way.

              Three for me with several doubts, from a short hour at runway 24 at Eham with various conditions.
              Want to offer them for pre-screen.

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12629[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12630[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12631[/ATTACH]
              1: Could use a bit more contrast
              2: Same here
              3: Borderline soft

              All of them fixable, IMO.
              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                1: Could use a bit more contrast
                2: Same here
                3: Borderline soft

                All of them fixable, IMO.
                Gerardo, thank you for your answer.

                Dropped the Easyjet in the Queue with additional sharpening.

                Can't increase the contrast to the KLM A330 for some reason,
                think there is just not enough light, can't get the shadows very strong. Will have to check it very good or keep it personal.
                The Transavia should be better.
                It's included again.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0257.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	463.0 KB
ID:	1021458

                And a re-edit of a photo earlier in this thread.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0170.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	1.37 MB
ID:	1021459

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                  Gerardo, thank you for your answer.

                  Dropped the Easyjet in the Queue with additional sharpening.

                  Can't increase the contrast to the KLM A330 for some reason,
                  think there is just not enough light, can't get the shadows very strong. Will have to check it very good or keep it personal.
                  The Transavia should be better.
                  It's included again.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12672[/ATTACH]

                  And a re-edit of a photo earlier in this thread.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]12673[/ATTACH]
                  1. orange tint, and needs tighter crop
                  2. blue tint, and very weak contrast

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    1. orange tint, and needs tighter crop
                    2. blue tint, and very weak contrast
                    Dana ,Thank for your clear answer.
                    At first my apologies for missing your answer on my previous post. I 've only seen the second answer.
                    Dropped the KLM A330 in the queue with increased contrast.
                    The Cityhopper E175 wil remain personal as tried two different things to increase contrast and both were called too weak.
                    As I see the photo now there is also improper light at the aircraft which creates imposibilliy for good contrast.

                    Re-edit of the Transavia. Made a tighter crop and reworked the white balance.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0257-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	775.3 KB
ID:	1021526

                    Two more for pre-screen.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9929.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	678.3 KB
ID:	1021527
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8319.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	655.6 KB
ID:	1021528

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Three more for check up above the previous request.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8180.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	591.2 KB
ID:	1021562
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6850.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	766.4 KB
ID:	1021563
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6897.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	736.2 KB
ID:	1021564

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                        Dana ,Thank for your clear answer.
                        At first my apologies for missing your answer on my previous post. I 've only seen the second answer.
                        Dropped the KLM A330 in the queue with increased contrast.
                        The Cityhopper E175 wil remain personal as tried two different things to increase contrast and both were called too weak.
                        As I see the photo now there is also improper light at the aircraft which creates imposibilliy for good contrast.

                        Re-edit of the Transavia. Made a tighter crop and reworked the white balance.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12753[/ATTACH]

                        Two more for pre-screen.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12754[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12755[/ATTACH]
                        1. a little yellow, and softness on tail
                        2. bit too high, and also tail softness
                        3. too high

                        Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                        Three more for check up above the previous request.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12798[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12799[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12800[/ATTACH]
                        Slight green tint on the first two; contrast a bit low on the third.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          1. a little yellow, and softness on tail
                          2. bit too high, and also tail softness
                          3. too high



                          Slight green tint on the first two; contrast a bit low on the third.
                          Dana, thank you for clear answers.
                          Improved versions of the Flybe and Ai Algerie are in the queue.

                          Offering improved versions of the Delta and the TUI again for check up.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8180.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	591.9 KB
ID:	1021586
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6897.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	895.6 KB
ID:	1021587

                          I also want to know what I should improve on this one.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8715-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	460.1 KB
ID:	1021588

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                            Dana, thank you for clear answers.
                            Improved versions of the Flybe and Ai Algerie are in the queue.

                            Offering improved versions of the Delta and the TUI again for check up.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12829[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12830[/ATTACH]

                            I also want to know what I should improve on this one.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12831[/ATTACH]
                            First two look ok.

                            Third one is almost backlit, but passable for me. However, there's a blurry smudge at the bottom of the frame, either a large dust spot, or where you have removed something?

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                              First two look ok.

                              Third one is almost backlit, but passable for me. However, there's a blurry smudge at the bottom of the frame, either a large dust spot, or where you have removed something?
                              Dana, thank you for quick answers and thoughts.

                              Playing with some old photos due to a lack of possibilities to go to AMS and many times bad weather for photography as well.
                              Checked the Finnair and seemed to have removed a pole. (I didn't remember)
                              As I know it's not obstructing the aircraft and JP-rules accept these things I put it back in.
                              Sun is at the back of the aircraft, there is not much shadow indeed at the aircraft, anyway I'll hhow the result again, but I'm afraid I lost the color again.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8715-3.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	806.3 KB
ID:	1021600

                              Want to offer two more for check up.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6847.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	1,022.0 KB
ID:	1021601
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6850.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	919.8 KB
ID:	1021602

                              Second one is the Fokker just earlier at this page, tried to remove the green cast. i'm afraid I went too far in it. Want to know for sure.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                                Checked the Finnair and seemed to have removed a pole. (I didn't remember)
                                As I know it's not obstructing the aircraft and JP-rules accept these things I put it back in.
                                I'll warn you that if you upload images with items removed, such as the pole above, it will result in 1) a permanent warning going on your uploader profile (visible to crew members when screening your images), and if repeated 2) a reduction in upload slots or 3) a complete upload ban. If you wish to avoid such measures, please review the upload guidelines on manipulation to see that such editing is strictly forbidden.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X