Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    I'll warn you that if you upload images with items removed, such as the pole above, it will result in 1) a permanent warning going on your uploader profile (visible to crew members when screening your images), and if repeated 2) a reduction in upload slots or 3) a complete upload ban. If you wish to avoid such measures, please review the upload guidelines on manipulation to see that such editing is strictly forbidden.
    Dana,

    I'm absolutely aware of the facts mentioned by you above.
    I edited this photo more than six months ago and I deerly forgot I removed the pole on this one. So please accept my apologies for that. If you don't want to receive the original version (with pole). Let me know. I'll keep it at personal. My editing flow is always to keep such things in the picture. For some reason, this one slipped through. If possible, check up the other ones. Again my apologies for the misunderstanding.

    Comment


    • #92
      Some more for pre-screen.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6847.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	1,022.0 KB
ID:	1021643
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6850.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	919.8 KB
ID:	1021644
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0348.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.50 MB
ID:	1021645
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0370.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	842.3 KB
ID:	1021646
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0393.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	612.9 KB
ID:	1021647

      Comment


      • #93
        Looks like you were not far from some of our crew members last sunday...

        Those 5 pics look acceptable, they even look very cool with all those poles... ok sorry

        Regards
        Alex

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
          Looks like you were not far from some of our crew members last sunday...

          Those 5 pics look acceptable, they even look very cool with all those poles... ok sorry

          Regards
          Alex
          Alex,

          Thanks a lot for your answer, appreciate your sense of humour.

          Yes I heard crew-members of JP were there, maybe nice for a meeting in the future.
          On April 14th and 15th I will be visiting Zurich with two friends,so who knows...
          Now back to topic...

          Won't upload the Finnair A350 at all, to avoid any troubles.
          Do I have to add special scheme to the Norwegian and the Nordica?

          Also five for advice and check-up.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3864.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	959.6 KB
ID:	1021733
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0317.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	613.1 KB
ID:	1021734
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0354.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	720.7 KB
ID:	1021735
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0374.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	471.3 KB
ID:	1021736
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0379.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	557.3 KB
ID:	1021737

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
            Alex,

            Thanks a lot for your answer, appreciate your sense of humour.

            Yes I heard crew-members of JP were there, maybe nice for a meeting in the future.
            On April 14th and 15th I will be visiting Zurich with two friends,so who knows...
            Now back to topic...

            Won't upload the Finnair A350 at all, to avoid any troubles.
            Do I have to add special scheme to the Norwegian and the Nordica?

            Also five for advice and check-up.

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13015[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13016[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13017[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13018[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13019[/ATTACH]
            1. Looks a little green to me plus a little dark.
            2. OK
            3. Maybe just a bit low in frame.
            4. Looks ok
            5. Looks ok

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
              1. Looks a little green to me plus a little dark.
              2. OK
              3. Maybe just a bit low in frame.
              4. Looks ok
              5. Looks ok
              James thank you for your answers.

              All are in the queue, some with some slight re-editing except the Qatar 777

              Tried to raise the exposure and remove the green cast in two different ways.
              Althought I know it will be a difficult one to get accepted.
              It's here again.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3864.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	957.4 KB
ID:	1021813

              Also four more for check-up and advice.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0298.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	737.5 KB
ID:	1021814
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0316.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	660.1 KB
ID:	1021815
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0458.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	815.0 KB
ID:	1021816
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0476.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1021817

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                James thank you for your answers.

                All are in the queue, some with some slight re-editing except the Qatar 777

                Tried to raise the exposure and remove the green cast in two different ways.
                Althought I know it will be a difficult one to get accepted.
                It's here again.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13108[/ATTACH]

                Also four more for check-up and advice.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13109[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13110[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13111[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13112[/ATTACH]
                1. borderline contrast/color
                2-5 no major issues I can see

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  1. borderline contrast/color
                  2-5 no major issues I can see
                  Dana,

                  Thank you for your time.
                  Nr 2-5 are in the queue.

                  Want to offer five other for check up.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0379.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	557.1 KB
ID:	1021886
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0360.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	941.5 KB
ID:	1021887
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0307.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	776.4 KB
ID:	1021888
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0469.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1021889
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0479.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	808.9 KB
ID:	1021890

                  Note to nr 1. Re-edit of this reject.https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6315803 . Don't understand the reason of the reject to be honest, but didn't feel that well about the photo, was too late to remove it, maybe some extra explanation is needed. Thought the exposure and saturation would be the problems by myself .
                  Note to nr 2. Do already have a photo of this one in the db. Should not be similar IMO.
                  Note to nr.3. Think it's too high, want to know for sure.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                    Dana,

                    Thank you for your time.
                    Nr 2-5 are in the queue.

                    Want to offer five other for check up.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13189[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13190[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13191[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13192[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13193[/ATTACH]

                    Note to nr 1. Re-edit of this reject.https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6315803 . Don't understand the reason of the reject to be honest, but didn't feel that well about the photo, was too late to remove it, maybe some extra explanation is needed. Thought the exposure and saturation would be the problems by myself .
                    Note to nr 2. Do already have a photo of this one in the db. Should not be similar IMO.
                    Note to nr.3. Think it's too high, want to know for sure.
                    Contrast was a bit low on the AA I suppose; looks fine to me now. Other four maybe a touch soft, but otherwise should be ok.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      Contrast was a bit low on the AA I suppose; looks fine to me now. Other four maybe a touch soft, but otherwise should be ok.
                      Dana, thank you for your time again, will do some necessary actions where needed.

                      However got this one rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6321901
                      Reason was a highlight warning which kept the exposure way too low.
                      Thought I couldn't repair this, but apparently I could.

                      This is the re-edit I want to offer for check up.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0476.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	1021940

                      Also two more.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0292.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	581.6 KB
ID:	1021941
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0388.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	820.2 KB
ID:	1021942

                      Comment


                      • Those 757 and 777 rejections, I would recommend an appeal.

                        The Easyjet and the KKLM 737 look ok to me

                        Regards
                        Alex

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                          Those 757 and 777 rejections, I would recommend an appeal.

                          The Easyjet and the KKLM 737 look ok to me

                          Regards
                          Alex
                          Thabk you Alex for your kind words.

                          Won't appeal at the AA as the re-edit is already in the queue, although I still don't agree with the reason. Exposure was too low as the Histogram also said that.
                          Had a Delta T7 accepted from the same day with more exposure and some kind of the same contrast.
                          Appealed at the KLM Asia T7 and the appeal was accepted.
                          Last edited by wkd001; 2018-01-24, 10:48. Reason: a change of facts

                          Comment


                          • Som edits for check up...

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0324.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	563.1 KB
ID:	1021979
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0327.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	803.5 KB
ID:	1021980
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0436.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	876.7 KB
ID:	1021981
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0448.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	858.0 KB
ID:	1021982
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0493.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1021983

                            Thanks in advance...

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                              Som edits for check up...

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13294[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13295[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13296[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13297[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13298[/ATTACH]

                              Thanks in advance...
                              Hey,

                              i think they can profit from a little bit more contrast by adjusting the levels, but otherwise they should be acceptable.
                              This is only my personal opinion, so probably there are another opinons too.

                              Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
                              Best Regards from Germany,
                              Julian S.​

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                                Som edits for check up...

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13294[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13295[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13296[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13297[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13298[/ATTACH]

                                Thanks in advance...
                                Maybe a touch soft in places, but otherwise no major issues for me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X