Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Olivier Landes. editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hello JP crew,

    I just found this picture is beautiful. I also have some in stock but I can not work them.

    why are not they backlit?

    What must be done to achieve this result?

    N175DN. Boeing 767-332(ER). JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Windy winter sunset. SP-EQC. Bombardier Dash 8-Q402. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Thank you

    Comment


    • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
      Hello JP crew,

      I just found this picture is beautiful. I also have some in stock but I can not work them.

      why are not they backlit?

      What must be done to achieve this result?

      N175DN. Boeing 767-332(ER). JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

      Windy winter sunset. SP-EQC. Bombardier Dash 8-Q402. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


      Thank you
      They are backlit, but as in these cases it was intentional and for good artistic effect, it is acceptable. You'll need to properly expose for the background, not the aircraft to achieve this effect.

      Comment


      • Ok , after correction with tour answer, it's better?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	14102017-DSC04961.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	289.6 KB
ID:	1022165

        Comment


        • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
          Ok , after correction with tour answer, it's better?

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13503[/ATTACH]
          Would be rejected for heat haze/soft.

          Comment


          • Hello JP Crew,

            For correction please,

            1 Click image for larger version

Name:	04022018-DSC07372.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1022290

            2 Click image for larger version

Name:	04022018-DSC07398.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1022291

            3 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07633.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	702.8 KB
ID:	1022292

            4 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07639.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	759.9 KB
ID:	1022293

            5 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07641.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	769.0 KB
ID:	1022294

            Thank you

            Comment


            • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
              Hello JP Crew,

              For correction please,

              1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13662[/ATTACH]

              2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13663[/ATTACH]

              3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13664[/ATTACH]

              4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13665[/ATTACH]

              5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13666[/ATTACH]

              Thank you
              All borderline in my opinion:
              1: Looks slightly overexposed
              2: OK
              3: Dark and slightly purple colour cast
              4: OK, maybe a bit soft
              5: contrast

              As mentioned, none are clear rejections, apart from #3. You can try to upload them as they are or you can try to improve them before uploading.
              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

              Comment


              • Thank for your answer.

                And anothes pictures because she have rejected.

                1 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07742.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	424.1 KB
ID:	1022337 what's categorie for this photo?

                2 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07732.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	403.3 KB
ID:	1022338 the same

                3 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07748.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	433.6 KB
ID:	1022339

                4 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07500.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	750.0 KB
ID:	1022340

                5 Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07541.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	617.9 KB
ID:	1022341

                Comment


                • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                  Thank for your answer.

                  And anothes pictures because she have rejected.

                  1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13717[/ATTACH] what's categorie for this photo?

                  2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13718[/ATTACH] the same

                  3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13719[/ATTACH]

                  4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13720[/ATTACH]

                  5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13721[/ATTACH]
                  Hello,

                  1 and 2 needs special scheme category.
                  3 and 4 can profit from a touch more contrast but otherwise they should be OK
                  5 contrast, soft/blurry

                  If you are unsure with the categorys or genre, search the database for the a/c and filter them by genre or category, only as a tip. Also try to place the watermark not direkt at the a/c because this can lead to a rejection if it´s too instrusive!

                  Please be aware that we check those images by our eyes as we have no screening tools here.

                  Have a nice day.
                  Best Regards from Germany,
                  Julian S.​

                  Comment


                  • Thank you Julian and congratulation for your promotion!!!!

                    Olivier

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                      Thank you Julian and congratulation for your promotion!!!!

                      Olivier
                      No problem and Thank you!
                      Best Regards from Germany,
                      Julian S.​

                      Comment


                      • I continue my corrections,

                        before

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	10022018-DSC08026.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	701.1 KB
ID:	1022360

                        after

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	10022018-DSC08026-0.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	731.2 KB
ID:	1022361


                        What do you think?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                          I continue my corrections,

                          before

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13741[/ATTACH]

                          after

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13742[/ATTACH]


                          What do you think?
                          There are some large dust spots in the picture, but other than that, it would be acceptable for me.
                          Please check your previous pre-screened pictures for dust too!
                          Best Regards from Germany,
                          Julian S.​

                          Comment


                          • Thank you Julian,


                            I always try adjustments. As for dust spots, I always remove them after !!!

                            and anothers pictures

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	08022018-DSC07775.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	676.1 KB
ID:	1022364

                            Comment


                            • for correction please

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                                Thank you Julian,


                                I always try adjustments. As for dust spots, I always remove them after !!!

                                and anothers pictures

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13745[/ATTACH]
                                Other than the dust spots, looks ok.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X