787 looks fine. And the warning tool in lightroom is extremely sensitive, small warning areas like those are no problem.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
tomo.rock - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Hi, JP Crew.
Thank you for screening at all times.
Please check this photo.
This photo has been rejected for "Too much or too little contrast" twice before.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I wonder which way (more/less contrast) I should edit this photo...
Best regards and a Happy New Year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomo.rock View PostHi, JP Crew.
Thank you for screening at all times.
Please check this photo.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12537[/ATTACH]
This photo has been rejected for "Too much or too little contrast" twice before.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I wonder which way (more/less contrast) I should edit this photo...
Best regards and a Happy New Year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View PostThe photo has clipped highlights and shadows. Checking the light in the photo, I doubt it can be brought to an acceptble level, unfortunately.
Thank you very much for your advice.
The light in raw file (original file) is not clipped.
I'm wondering if it's "too much" or "too little".
Therefore, I don't know which way (direction) I should edit.
Anyway, I'm going to check it again.
Best Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomo.rock View PostHello, LX-A343
Thank you very much for your advice.
The light in raw file (original file) is not clipped.
I'm wondering if it's "too much" or "too little".
Therefore, I don't know which way (direction) I should edit.
Anyway, I'm going to check it again.
Best Regards
Comment
-
Thank you for screening at all times.
Please allow me to ask.
This photo [id 6428701] was rejected for "Backlit".
>> http://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6428701
I appealed as,
>> This is not "Backlit". Sun shines from 2 o'clock direction. Thank you in advance.
And Admin Comments is,
>> you're showing the part which is in the shadow (belly) - regards
Sorry to say but, my questions are;
1. I've confirmed "general rule". And it says,
- Don't take pictures with the sun in your eyes >> No, I didn't.
- shooting against the sun >> No, I didn't.
- puts the visible half of the aircraft in shadow >> Please take a look
at rear Reg.number [EI-EJN] on fuselage, it gets the sunbeam.
And it shows much more than "half".
Is this "general rule" for backlit fair for everyone, for every photo?
2. If we are not allowed to show "the part which is in the shadow",
I wonder why these kind of photos have been accepted?
- example 1) https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8877264
- example 2) https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8872752
* Above 2 examples photos are mine.
I never show any examples that were taken by another photographer.
For the purpose not to waste thread of the forum,
I use this "Editing Advice" thread.
If I should better use another thread or post new thread,
let me know it please.
Thank you very much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomo.rock View PostThank you for screening at all times.
Please allow me to ask.
This photo [id 6428701] was rejected for "Backlit".
>> http://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6428701
I appealed as,
>> This is not "Backlit". Sun shines from 2 o'clock direction. Thank you in advance.
And Admin Comments is,
>> you're showing the part which is in the shadow (belly) - regards
Sorry to say but, my questions are;
1. I've confirmed "general rule". And it says,
- Don't take pictures with the sun in your eyes >> No, I didn't.
- shooting against the sun >> No, I didn't.
- puts the visible half of the aircraft in shadow >> Please take a look
at rear Reg.number [EI-EJN] on fuselage, it gets the sunbeam.
And it shows much more than "half".
Is this "general rule" for backlit fair for everyone, for every photo?
2. If we are not allowed to show "the part which is in the shadow",
I wonder why these kind of photos have been accepted?
- example 1) https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8877264
- example 2) https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8872752
* Above 2 examples photos are mine.
I never show any examples that were taken by another photographer.
For the purpose not to waste thread of the forum,
I use this "Editing Advice" thread.
If I should better use another thread or post new thread,
let me know it please.
Thank you very much.
Comment
-
Hi, JP Crew
Thank you for screening at all times.
Is this backlit?
If so, the shadow of main wing should not appear on the fuselage, I think.
Best Regards,
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomo.rock View PostHi, JP Crew
Thank you for screening at all times.
Is this backlit?
If so, the shadow of main wing should not appear on the fuselage, I think.
Best Regards,
In this case it will be better to wait more comments.
Cheers,
Vinicius
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomo.rock View PostHi, JP Crew
Thank you for screening at all times.
Is this backlit?
If so, the shadow of main wing should not appear on the fuselage, I think.
Best Regards,
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomo.rock View PostVinicius-san, Dana-san,
I appreciate your advices.
And your explanations are really helpful!
I must learn how to edit well and try to make that picture much better.
Thank you very much again.
Dana give you a better and correct explanation than mine (also I learn with his explanation) but as he said the photo can be improved it will be a pleasure to help if you want.
Cheers,
Vinicius
Comment
Comment