Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ililo23 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
    Thank you! I'll try to fix the 1. and 2.
    I also received on following images rejection due to Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered). I checked that the aircraft is correctly centered, why are they being rejected?

    1. (also Dark / Underexposed, I'll try to fix it)
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14749[/ATTACH]

    2. (also Too much or too little contrast, I'll try to fix it)
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14750[/ATTACH]

    3.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14751[/ATTACH]

    Thanks in advance!
    All of them a little too low in the frame.

    Comment


    • #17
      Thank you! I'll try to fix it.

      I corrected the following ones, are they now ok?

      1.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AINE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	429.3 KB
ID:	1023166
      It's difficult to me how to edit photos taken during sunset, I try to leave them as natural as I take, but almost always I receive a rejection due to Dark.

      2.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LLM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	452.0 KB
ID:	1023167

      And what about this two new ones:

      3.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENP.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	417.1 KB
ID:	1023168

      4.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	9A-CTK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	449.3 KB
ID:	1023169

      Thanks in advance!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
        Thank you! I'll try to fix it.

        I corrected the following ones, are they now ok?

        1.
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14764[/ATTACH]
        It's difficult to me how to edit photos taken during sunset, I try to leave them as natural as I take, but almost always I receive a rejection due to Dark.

        2.
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14765[/ATTACH]

        And what about this two new ones:

        3.
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14766[/ATTACH]

        4.
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14767[/ATTACH]

        Thanks in advance!
        1. contrast (too harsh), oversharpened
        2. contrast
        3. borderline contrast
        4. borderline dark

        The problem with the sunset shots is not the fact that it is sunset, but that there appears to be a thin layer of cloud which is blocking direct light. This is especially evident in images 2 & 3 above.

        Comment


        • #19
          Thank you for the previous help!

          What about this four:

          1.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MDZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	437.0 KB
ID:	1023232

          2.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MNB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	394.4 KB
ID:	1023233

          3.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENQ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	430.3 KB
ID:	1023234

          4.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JJM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	517.5 KB
ID:	1023235

          Thanks in advance!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
            Thank you for the previous help!

            What about this four:

            1.
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14849[/ATTACH]

            2.
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14850[/ATTACH]

            3.
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14851[/ATTACH]

            4.
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14852[/ATTACH]

            Thanks in advance!
            1. soft, contrast (too harsh)
            2. soft
            3. soft
            4. soft, contrast

            Comment


            • #21
              Thank you for the help!
              On the 4. photo what should I do, increase o decrease the contrast?

              What about this ones?:
              1. It was previously rejected due to Soft
              Click image for larger version.

              Thanks in advance!
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
                Thank you for the help!
                On the 4. photo what should I do, increase o decrease the contrast?

                What about this ones?:
                1. It was previously rejected due to Soft
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14921[/ATTACH]

                2.
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14922[/ATTACH]

                3.
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14923[/ATTACH]

                Thanks in advance!
                1: looks a bit soft (for example whole upper edge of fuselage), as if you used some noise reducer
                2: OK, but maybe some screeners will see it as a bit too dark
                3: Looks OK here
                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thank you for the previous help!

                  I recently received a rejection due to Over Processed / Bad postprocessing on the following photo. What should I do?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENP.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	417.1 KB
ID:	1023306

                  Thanks in advance!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
                    Thank you for the previous help!

                    I recently received a rejection due to Over Processed / Bad postprocessing on the following photo. What should I do?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14938[/ATTACH]

                    Thanks in advance!
                    Get rid of the editing halos visible on the wing/top of fuselage.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Thank you for the previous help!

                      What about this? I've previously received a rejection due to Dark / Underexposed and Vignetting not allowed. Is it now ok?

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-DJH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	444.1 KB
ID:	1023331

                      Thanks in advance!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
                        Thank you for the previous help!

                        What about this? I've previously received a rejection due to Dark / Underexposed and Vignetting not allowed. Is it now ok?

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14966[/ATTACH]

                        Thanks in advance!
                        In my opinion it is still a little bit underexposed but worth a try.
                        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Thank you for the help!


                          I've recently uploaded the following imagen which was pre-screened as OK but it has been rejected due to Blurry &
                          Undersharpened (Soft)

                          I can't see any blurry on the image, should I try to re-upload or correct it?


                          Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	423.7 KB
ID:	1023291


                          Thanks in advance!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
                            Thank you for the help!


                            I've recently uploaded the following imagen which was pre-screened as OK but it has been rejected due to Blurry &
                            Undersharpened (Soft)

                            I can't see any blurry on the image, should I try to re-upload or correct it?


                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14923[/ATTACH]


                            Thanks in advance!
                            The tail is quite soft, almost blurry. Sorry that this was missed before.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Thank you for the previous help!

                              What about this three new ones?

                              1.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LYR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	436.3 KB
ID:	1027433

                              2.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-HPR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	395.3 KB
ID:	1027434

                              3.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUUX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	428.7 KB
ID:	1027435

                              Thanks in advance!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ililo23 View Post
                                Thank you for the previous help!

                                What about this three new ones?

                                1.
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15086[/ATTACH]

                                2.
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15087[/ATTACH]

                                3.
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15088[/ATTACH]

                                Thanks in advance!
                                All of them a bit soft, but other than that, no major issues.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X