Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: StefBrat - Editing and Screening advice

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Both oversharpened but otherwise ok as long as uploaded with correct info.
    Is it better now? Info should be airport overview?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4432.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.75 MB 
ID:	14232

    Below the original unedited image, maybe the JPEG is simply not good
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4432-2.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	1.47 MB 
ID:	14233

  2. #22
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    Is it better now? Info should be airport overview?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4432.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.75 MB 
ID:	14232
    Would be ok for me. Yes, Airport Overview.

  3. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    What do you think with that picture below? Is from 2016 and not sure with sharpness/noise and if it's overall worth for uploading?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7251.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	14354

  4. #24
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    What do you think with that picture below? Is from 2016 and not sure with sharpness/noise and if it's overall worth for uploading?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7251.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	14354
    Neither noise nor sharpness should be an issue.

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Could you please have a look here: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6440783

    It was two times rejected for horizon but in LR the red/white pole in the back looks good.

  6. #26
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    Could you please have a look here: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6440783

    It was two times rejected for horizon but in LR the red/white pole in the back looks good.
    In fact the red/white pole is leaning right (as are all other verticals) which indicates CCW rotation is needed.

  7. #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Hmm..one of the things which are taking my most time. Could you please check again, especially for horizon but if you see something else please give a shout I would like to get it accepted as I like the shot and the viewpoint

    Thanks

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6840.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.42 MB 
ID:	14473

  8. #28
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    I would give it a 0.3 CCW rotation, except that it looks acceptable I think

    cheers
    Alex

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Could you please look on these, the aircrafts should all be new or nearly all. But of course I'd like to maintain the needed quality so please check for that Many thanks

    My most concerns are leveling, noise, blurry or soft.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7271.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.12 MB 
ID:	14559

    Looks unleveled but the black window of the house in the back seems leveled
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7283.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	999.3 KB 
ID:	14560

    This will be Ramp shot ticked...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7290.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.54 MB 
ID:	14561

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7295.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	865.4 KB 
ID:	14562

    PS: Sorry for the questions

  10. #30
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    Could you please look on these, the aircrafts should all be new or nearly all. But of course I'd like to maintain the needed quality so please check for that Many thanks

    My most concerns are leveling, noise, blurry or soft.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7271.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.12 MB 
ID:	14559

    Looks unleveled but the black window of the house in the back seems leveled
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7283.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	999.3 KB 
ID:	14560

    This will be Ramp shot ticked...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7290.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.54 MB 
ID:	14561

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7295.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	865.4 KB 
ID:	14562

    PS: Sorry for the questions
    Hey

    1, 2 and 4 should be OK for me
    3 is that a dust spot or a bird above the highest tree? Can´t identify it. But other than that it should be OK too.

    Have a good start in the new week!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  11. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Could that be considered as ramp shot or would get a rejection for bad motive or quality wise? Any other problems?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8204.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.79 MB 
ID:	15557

    That for being not leveled or the person is to easy to find in the world?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8213.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.43 MB 
ID:	15559

    Not sure with the quality and light. Looks a bit strange for me...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8194.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.49 MB 
ID:	15558

  12. #32
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    hi,
    1) ok as ramp
    2) motive rejection due to recognisable face
    3) contrast issue due to overexposed sky and slightly backlit as well

    Kind Regards
    Alex

  13. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    2) motive rejection due to recognisable face
    3) contrast issue due to overexposed sky and slightly backlit as well
    Okay. Thought that the second one would have a contrast problem but for you information it's not backlit as the sun was at 5 o'clock already in the back

  14. #34
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,054

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    Okay. Thought that the second one would have a contrast problem but for you information it's not backlit as the sun was at 5 o'clock already in the back
    Tail in shadow, most of the fuselage in shadow, washed out background -> slightly backlit

  15. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Would be seeking for some advice on these pics, thanks in advantage for your help

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7922.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	15997

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8235.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	15998

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8240.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.18 MB 
ID:	15999

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8250.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.71 MB 
ID:	16000

  16. #36
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,054

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    Would be seeking for some advice on these pics, thanks in advantage for your help

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7922.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	15997

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8235.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.16 MB 
ID:	15998

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8240.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.18 MB 
ID:	15999

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8250.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.71 MB 
ID:	16000
    1: engines are more or less pitch black. If you adjust the curves, you can improve that without impacting the rest of the image. In my opinion, there is also too much dead space below the aircraft for a chopped off tail
    2: nice! Even though it would look better if you used the rule of thirds for framing it.
    3: nice!
    4: nice!! Just don't forget the Vintage category

  17. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    2: nice! Even though it would look better if you used the rule of thirds for framing it.
    Thanks for the feedback What do you mean with that? Do you mean I should more focus on the right and main part of the terminal? Or open the view and also show the bit cut of on the left?

  18. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Would like to hear your opinion on that photo. I thought about uploading as Spotting location...but not sure if it does not show enough of the location (there is not that much more around to show by the way).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0331.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.56 MB 
ID:	16610

    PS: Here is the uncropped one only to compare with the edited one above
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0331 (2).JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.71 MB 
ID:	16611

  19. #39
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefBrat View Post
    Would like to hear your opinion on that photo. I thought about uploading as Spotting location...but not sure if it does not show enough of the location (there is not that much more around to show by the way).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0331.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.56 MB 
ID:	16610

    PS: Here is the uncropped one only to compare with the edited one above
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0331 (2).JPG 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.71 MB 
ID:	16611
    Spotting Location should be acceptable for this one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •