Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StefBrat - Editing and Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    The last 3 pictures where accepted without trouble, thanks for the help.

    For the photo below, please mainly look on the framing. Not sure if I need to cut of the A330 to get the photo accepted. I think it looks better with the A330 full visible. Please judge yourself

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0471.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.43 MB
ID:	1031331
    View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
      The last 3 pictures where accepted without trouble, thanks for the help.

      For the photo below, please mainly look on the framing. Not sure if I need to cut of the A330 to get the photo accepted. I think it looks better with the A330 full visible. Please judge yourself

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19821[/ATTACH]
      Hi.

      It depends on the personal opinion if it get accepted or not. For me the crop works, but probably it look much nicer if you don´t cut any plane and use 16:9 format then.

      Hope this will help you.
      Have a nice start into the new week!
      Best Regards from Germany,
      Julian S.​

      Comment


      • #63
        Sharpness/Soft rejection

        Hey mates,

        during the last time I got many rejections for "soft". But I mainly use the same basic settings within Lightroom for all photos and then adjust the sharpness depending on the photo. But there is no indicator for sharpness like a histogram for brightness. How should I know if it's okay? Below the last rejections from today.

        JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


        JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
        View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
          Hey mates,

          during the last time I got many rejections for "soft". But I mainly use the same basic settings within Lightroom for all photos and then adjust the sharpness depending on the photo. But there is no indicator for sharpness like a histogram for brightness. How should I know if it's okay? Below the last rejections from today.

          JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6949700
          Neither of those look particularly soft to me. The second maybe could use a touch of sharpening, but the first I would have accepted.

          If you appeal, please use your own justification rather than "I asked in the forum, and... said"

          Also, please use this thread for any further posts, rather than starting a new thread each time.

          Comment


          • #65
            Would the following photo would had a change? I thought trying it here as it was today a clear and cold day. Never tried something before. Its also not taken with a special lens, only with a normal 100-400 II

            PS: Its a lot of noise/compression in the picture I just recognized that after uploading

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0164.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	692.8 KB
ID:	1032448
            View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
              Would the following photo would had a change? I thought trying it here as it was today a clear and cold day. Never tried something before. Its also not taken with a special lens, only with a normal 100-400 II

              PS: Its a lot of noise/compression in the picture I just recognized that after uploading

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]21199[/ATTACH]
              At 1400pix, no. Soft, and too much noise/compression as you noted. Maybe at 1024, but couldn't guarantee that.

              Comment


              • #67
                Is this photo okay? I'm mainly asking because the tail looks a bit darker then the rest so a screener could say it way backlit but it wasn't.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0971_jp.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.83 MB
ID:	1032647
                View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                  Is this photo okay? I'm mainly asking because the tail looks a bit darker then the rest so a screener could say it way backlit but it wasn't.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]21443[/ATTACH]
                  Hi, looking backlit for me, could go either way.
                  Regards
                  T

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Would such a composition have a chance? The black military police car is blocking always the view...

                    If yes, as what should I upload? As ramp or as Brasilian airforce?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0331.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.62 MB
ID:	1032707
                    View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                      Would such a composition have a chance? The black military police car is blocking always the view...

                      If yes, as what should I upload? As ramp or as Brasilian airforce?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]21530[/ATTACH]
                      This should be acceptable as a Ramp shot. Borderline dark however.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Thanks for the help

                        Another one with help if it's good to go for upload

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0781.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.36 MB
ID:	1032835
                        View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                          Thanks for the help

                          Another one with help if it's good to go for upload

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]21686[/ATTACH]
                          Would be rejected for dirty and overprocessed.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            A word on this please. Not sure if the crop is okay

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0873.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1033167
                            View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                              A word on this please. Not sure if the crop is okay

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]22084[/ATTACH]
                              Crop is ok. Slight orange tint and suffering from compression however.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                I have these two below rejected because of JPEG compression. But others from the same series or from the same editing process are not having that problem in the queue. I nearly always proceed my photos with the same and of course highest quality.

                                JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                                This last time got rejected for being dark, I only added more brightness and thats all...why it's not "compressed"
                                JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
                                View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X