If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
What is the problem here? It was early morning light and the contrast seems fine. What adjustment should be made here?
Just my opinion and stand for correction but I personally think it is a bit over saturated. Still a brilliant and exceptional photo in my opinion!
Have a great day ahead
Last edited by Matthew Rodgers; 2017-11-12, 18:48.
Reason: Backspaced something by accideant
The photo had been wrongly rejected. My apologies, the photo has now been accepted.
For perfection it could use a tad more red tint (less green). In case you want to fine-tune it, use the resubmit option from the photo page.
1. This first one, I can understand one objection. Clearly, the wrong reg. But the category wrong or missing? I'm assuming dusk/night lighting, but before I assume and pick the wrong one, can you confirm?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
2. This second one, I'll deal with the sharpness issue, but the bad hue/colour? Seems ok to me, but what have I done to mess it up (or what can I do to correct it?!)
1. This first one, I can understand one objection. Clearly, the wrong reg. But the category wrong or missing? I'm assuming dusk/night lighting, but before I assume and pick the wrong one, can you confirm?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
2. This second one, I'll deal with the sharpness issue, but the bad hue/colour? Seems ok to me, but what have I done to mess it up (or what can I do to correct it?!)
First one should indeed be 'night shot'. Second one has a very slight green cast, but I wouldn't have rejected it for color. The softness is an issue, but if you can address that, I don't see why it shouldn't be accepted.
Hello, I've had the attached photo rejected; the "not centred" thing I can deal with, but the "horizon unlevel" issue is confusing me a little. I had used the poles in the background as the reference point. What do you look for when you are determining the levelness of the horizon?
I don’t see anything from the vertical references that would indicate the horizon is significantly off. Recentering it a bit higher in the frame should be enough.
I’ve moved your post here to your previous thread, but please keep your posts to your own thread in the future.
I had the following two rejections. I suspect that the "categories wrong or missing" refers to the fact that it was sunrise and I should have ticked the "night shot" box. If not, please let me know and I'll tick the appropriate box.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
If it is, as I suspect, due to night lighting, can you please say what the deciding factor is - anything from dusk to dawn. I've had a few occasions, where I have ticked this and photos have been rejected because of it (and it was dawn or dusk!) - and a few accepted where it wasn't ticked at all. Some guidance would be much appreciated!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
These are the same photo.
Also, there does not appear to be a serial number. The aircraft has a serial #5441. It could be that, or it could be the lack of a “night shot” tick, or both. I don’t have any inside information to help you further than that.
I had the following two rejections. I suspect that the "categories wrong or missing" refers to the fact that it was sunrise and I should have ticked the "night shot" box. If not, please let me know and I'll tick the appropriate box.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
If it is, as I suspect, due to night lighting, can you please say what the deciding factor is - anything from dusk to dawn. I've had a few occasions, where I have ticked this and photos have been rejected because of it (and it was dawn or dusk!) - and a few accepted where it wasn't ticked at all. Some guidance would be much appreciated!
Yes, should have been Night Shot, but had that been the only issue, it would have been fixed for you. As we do not reject for bad categories alone.
Got this one rejected for sharpness (which I can fix) - and dust spots, which I can't, because I can't see them. Can you tell me where you are seeing them. Camera cleaned recently, so there shouldn't be any.
If you look at the top, not only does it say dust spots, but also 'Dirty Scan' When you use the 'Check for dust' Tool, you can see that it is a dirty scan.
I got this one rejected for "undersharpened/soft", which is fine (I will correct), but also for "categories wrong or missing". I'm not quite sure what category/ies should be ticked for this. It's a maritime patrol, not a cargo, aircraft and a Casa 235 can hardly be a small prop. Can any screener confirm?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment