If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The light on the tail is only on the front edge, with the rest of the tail well in shadow. The shadow along the fuselage extends well above the windows. The vast majority of the aircraft seen in your photo is in shadow, thus the justified rejection for being backlit. Any attempt to adjust the contrast will not get you past the backlit problem.
The light on the tail is only on the front edge, with the rest of the tail well in shadow. The shadow along the fuselage extends well above the windows. The vast majority of the aircraft seen in your photo is in shadow, thus the justified rejection for being backlit. Any attempt to adjust the contrast will not get you past the backlit problem.
DJ Reed/Screening Team
Hi DJ,
Thank you for the answer.
Of course I respect that, although it seems a bit different to me, but apparently I'm wrong.
I’m not on the best monitor to judge it but it looks like excessive contrast to me with the blacks needing to be lightened a bit and the whitesbeing toned down a bit.
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
I’m not on the best monitor to judge it but it looks like excessive contrast to me with the blacks needing to be lightened a bit and the whitesbeing toned down a bit.
This photo was for a few hours in screening, so I suppose there was one screener who voted to accept the photo and one screener who voted to reject the photo, and the third decided to reject it.
I'm afraid that the rejection here is quite harsh.
The leveling here is according to the verticals that are clearly visible in the whole photo before the cropping, but here it is less visible.
I'm writing here because another appeal was rejected today and I can not submit another appeal.
I would appreciate if one of the seniors could check it out.
This photo was for a few hours in screening, so I suppose there was one screener who voted to accept the photo and one screener who voted to reject the photo, and the third decided to reject it.
I'm afraid that the rejection here is quite harsh.
The leveling here is according to the verticals that are clearly visible in the whole photo before the cropping, but here it is less visible.
I'm writing here because another appeal was rejected today and I can not submit another appeal.
I would appreciate if one of the seniors could check it out.
Thanks in advance,
Erez.
Once again, we ask that you please use the editing/rejection advice thread you already have open.
I bring here four photos I took recently in Eilat Airport.
These are moments with a little Israeli history.
The Dakota, which was erected as a monument for several years at the airport in Eilat, was moved last night to the new international airport "Ramon" near Eilat.
In these photos you can see some of the actions before the moving of the aircraft.
My question is whether it is possible to upload at least two of these photos without being considered "similar"?
What do you think about it?
Note: These photos are not yet edited, I asking answers only in principle regarding the "similar", but if your answer is positive, I will be happy to receive recommendations about the photos that you prefer.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment