Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

theaviationspotter - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18646[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]18647[/ATTACH]

    Well; I would like to ask you assuming that this area is ''editing advice topic'';

    how about the quality of the photo?

    If I want to improve, what should I pay attention to?

    On the other hand, is it just a waste of time activity?
    Second one is better, but both have issues with softness and noise.

    Comment


    • #77
      Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-CBA_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	704.2 KB
ID:	1030431

      Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-CBC_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	670.4 KB
ID:	1030432

      Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-LSH_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	668.0 KB
ID:	1030433

      Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-LTW_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	642.3 KB
ID:	1030434

      a quick review would be appreciated.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]18756[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]18757[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]18758[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]18759[/ATTACH]

        a quick review would be appreciated.
        Borderline soft/contrast, but maybe passable.

        Comment


        • #79
          Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-AFB_20_01_2016_LTBA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.2 KB
ID:	1030467

          Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENB_04_08_2018_LTBA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	302.6 KB
ID:	1030468

          Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ATUZ_06_07_2017_EDDL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	661.4 KB
ID:	1030469

          Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-BIT_06_07_2017_EDDL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	610.3 KB
ID:	1030470

          Click image for larger version

Name:	YV3016_03_08_2018_LTBA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	694.3 KB
ID:	1030471

          Another branch of controversial photos for me.
          A quick review would be appreciated.

          P.S: Thanks to everyone who helps me in that thread however special thanks dlowwa, for taking time and always trying to help me

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]18798[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]18799[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]18800[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]18801[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]18802[/ATTACH]

            Another branch of controversial photos for me.
            A quick review would be appreciated.

            P.S: Thanks to everyone who helps me in that thread however special thanks dlowwa, for taking time and always trying to help me
            1. soft, centering
            2. borderline soft, dark/contrast
            3. borderline heat haze
            4. horizon, borderline heat haze
            5. soft

            Comment


            • #81
              Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LWA_03_07_2017_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	480.5 KB
ID:	1030740

              A quick review would be appreciated.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]19131[/ATTACH]

                A quick review would be appreciated.
                Likely a contrast rejection.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	9A-CTH_21_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	317.2 KB
ID:	1030767

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	B-2481_23_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	511.5 KB
ID:	1030768

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	B-18001_21_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	321.8 KB
ID:	1030769

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ALFC_21_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	286.7 KB
ID:	1030770

                  A quick review would be appreciated.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19163[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19164[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19165[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19166[/ATTACH]

                    A quick review would be appreciated.
                    1. borderline soft/dark
                    2. contrast, clutter
                    3-4 dark/contrast

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      I would like to ask a few question instead of screening a photo;

                      1.Click image for larger version

Name:	20171027_152628.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1031368

                      Question A. For the red security strip in the photo, can we say obstructin object? The reason I'm asking may be so, but it's technically impossible to take that strip and I can't take pictures of it any higher.
                      Question B. Assuming that I have uploaded the above photo securely, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8762908; with the photo in the link I've mentioned is considered as similar?

                      2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5761.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	714.8 KB
ID:	1031369

                      I can edit the photo, but is the photo considered as a backlit?

                      Thanks in advance.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
                        I would like to ask a few question instead of screening a photo;

                        1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19861[/ATTACH]

                        Question A. For the red security strip in the photo, can we say obstructin object? The reason I'm asking may be so, but it's technically impossible to take that strip and I can't take pictures of it any higher.
                        Question B. Assuming that I have uploaded the above photo securely, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8762908; with the photo in the link I've mentioned is considered as similar?

                        2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19862[/ATTACH]

                        I can edit the photo, but is the photo considered as a backlit?

                        Thanks in advance.
                        1. Not obstruction
                        2. Yes similar
                        3. Not quite backlit, but quality is terrible, so doubt any edit will be workable

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	4R-ALQ_11_04_2018_WMKK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	324.1 KB
ID:	1031636

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	9K-CAJ_27_11_2017_OJAI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	617.4 KB
ID:	1031637

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-BBO_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	706.7 KB
ID:	1031638

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-CBA_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	704.2 KB
ID:	1031639

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	OD-MRL_16_12_2017_OJAI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	734.4 KB
ID:	1031640

                          A simple comment would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20214[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20215[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20216[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20217[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20218[/ATTACH]

                            A simple comment would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
                            1: Harsh contrast, soft
                            2: Needs a bit of CCW rotation
                            3, 4: soft
                            5: OK
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	RMI.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	687.4 KB
ID:	1032302

                              Hi again, is that shot considered as backlit ?

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]21041[/ATTACH]

                                Hi again, is that shot considered as backlit ?
                                It is borderline backlit. The aircraft has a harsh contrast, the tail is in its own shadow, the background is washed out. As mentioned, it is borderline. you can try it if you want.
                                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X