Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 246

Thread: MartinezRoe7 - Editing Advice

  1. #21
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    A thousand apologies, it is not my intention to waste your time.
    but when I clicked on the link that I published, I found the AeroMéxico Quetzacoatl that I want to know about, whether it is OK to publish or not and if so, if it falls into the category of "night shot"

    Flickr offers many different sizes of that photo, only 2 or 3 are sizes you can upload here. So, please re-size to the final photo you want to upload and show only this one here.

  2. #22
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    Flickr offers many different sizes of that photo, only 2 or 3 are sizes you can upload here. So, please re-size to the final photo you want to upload and show only this one here.
    Ok Geri, now I understand.
    I don't speak English so well, so I started using the translator to understand and write.

    I will see how to upload the photo here in the forum, but seeing other topics I already understood that it is a night shot photo.

    Thank you very much for the explanation.

  3. #23
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    A thousand apologies, it is not my intention to waste your time.
    but when I clicked on the link that I published, I found the AeroMéxico Quetzacoatl that I want to know about, whether it is OK to publish or not and if so, if it falls into the category of "night shot"

    No need to apologize, just explaining why I won't comment on that post. Choose one of the upload-sized versions (I suggest something in the 1200-1600 pix range) and attach post it in this thread if you'd still like a comment.

  4. #24
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    No need to apologize, just explaining why I won't comment on that post. Choose one of the upload-sized versions (I suggest something in the 1200-1600 pix range) and attach post it in this thread if you'd still like a comment.
    I appreciate your explanation and even more the willingness to see my photo, but I looked back on the forums and something I could find, besides filtering in the search of images that are here in JetPhotos. Finally, thanks to his advice I was able to achieve a "Night Shot" photo.

    PS: I was left with the question of how the hell to upload a photo here in the forum. I modified the size and nothing. I will see what I can do about it and thus not insist on the subject of flickr

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8813341

  5. #25
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection. I edited a photo the same day and with minutes of difference and they approved it. Will it be the dark for the painting of the plane?

    Greetings and thanks in advance


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6300334

  6. #26
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection. I edited a photo the same day and with minutes of difference and they approved it. Will it be the dark for the painting of the plane?

    Greetings and thanks in advance


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6300334
    Hey

    You have only to increase hilights by adjusting the levels in the histogram.
    This is what you should have then (left side is edited, the right side is your original). If you see it´s much brighter now . I think it´s acceptable but no 100% guarantee.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	74499_1515377271.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	569.7 KB 
ID:	12963

    Here is a "screenshot" of the settings in the histogram (PS Elements 15).
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	b.JPG 
Views:	32 
Size:	32.3 KB 
ID:	12964



    Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  7. #27
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection. I edited a photo the same day and with minutes of difference and they approved it. Will it be the dark for the painting of the plane?
    No, whole image is underexposed.

  8. #28
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    No, whole image is underexposed.
    Thanks dlowwa !

  9. #29
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey

    You have only to increase hilights by adjusting the levels in the histogram.
    This is what you should have then (left side is edited, the right side is your original). If you see it´s much brighter now . I think it´s acceptable but no 100% guarantee.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	74499_1515377271.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	569.7 KB 
ID:	12963

    Here is a "screenshot" of the settings in the histogram (PS Elements 15).
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	b.JPG 
Views:	32 
Size:	32.3 KB 
ID:	12964



    Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
    Hi Julian

    I want to thank you for the help. With this I learn another step in the editing of the photos, because as I said before, just last year I decided to upload photos and edit in PS (I have the CC version 2017).

    I did not know how to edit it in the histogram and already with the photo I can understand something.

    I owe you one!
    Thanks and greetings from Chile

  10. #30
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hi Julian

    I want to thank you for the help. With this I learn another step in the editing of the photos, because as I said before, just last year I decided to upload photos and edit in PS (I have the CC version 2017).

    I did not know how to edit it in the histogram and already with the photo I can understand something.

    I owe you one!
    Thanks and greetings from Chile

    It´s our hobby, so, no big thing! I´m very happy that this was helpful for you .

    Happy Spottings and a lot of accepted pictures.
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  11. #31
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection.

    in the first photo I don't see that it's dark, it strikes me that they tell me that it is "dark / underexposed"

    in the second I don't see differences of light, although in comparison with the one that upload from the same date and same plane (although different angle), yes, it is avoidable, but I always prefer to have your opinion and thus continue improving.

    Thank you in advance


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6329264

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6329242

  12. #32
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,403

    Default

    Hi,
    The 707 isn't dark and I've now added the pic to the database

    For the Alitalia the light conditions were really too bad and I would recommend to keep that one for the personnal collection

    Regards
    Alex

  13. #33
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Hi,
    The 707 isn't dark and I've now added the pic to the database

    For the Alitalia the light conditions were really too bad and I would recommend to keep that one for the personnal collection

    Regards
    Alex
    Alex:

    As always, very kind of you and a thousand thanks for the help and advice.

    Greetings from Chile

  14. #34
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    I don't know if I should discuss in this topic, but I consult the following:
    More than 3 days ago I uploaded the CC-BEK photo, but in the FR24 app I don't see it reflected, being that it's more current than it already appears. I must clarify that I never put "exclude Flighr Radar" at the time of upload.
    Why does this happen?

    Greetings and thanks in advance.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8833259

  15. #35
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,403

    Default

    FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

    Regards
    Alex

  16. #36
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

    Regards
    Alex
    OK, thanks Alex!

  17. #37
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

    Regards
    Alex
    Dear Alex, I insist again on the subject ... and more than insist, I want to know what happened. Today I see that the same photo of the CC-BEK, of a friend, if it comes out in FR24.

    I insist that I didn't check the "exclude from Flight Radar" option. I do it because I don't want it to happen again not only with me, but with the rest of the spotters that we contribute to this page. I do it with pleasure, but these things seem strange to me.

    Greetings and I remain attentive to your comments

  18. #38
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Dear Alex, I insist again on the subject ... and more than insist, I want to know what happened. Today I see that the same photo of the CC-BEK, of a friend, if it comes out in FR24.

    I insist that I didn't check the "exclude from Flight Radar" option. I do it because I don't want it to happen again not only with me, but with the rest of the spotters that we contribute to this page. I do it with pleasure, but these things seem strange to me.

    Greetings and I remain attentive to your comments
    Looks like someone forgot to exclude it. We try to be as consistent as possible, but sometimes things get missed. I'll see that it is excluded as well.

  19. #39
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Looks like someone forgot to exclude it. We try to be as consistent as possible, but sometimes things get missed. I'll see that it is excluded as well.
    In my opinion (which can differ from yours without problems), both should be left, since it shows the most important thing of the plane (the mark of Pope Francis and the Vatican shield). They would pay "just for sinners" in case such a photo is excluded. Besides, it's not the only one I've seen out there, but I'm advocating what you tell me. But it's just an opinion, I always give it while it's in the JetPhotos rules.

    Thanks Dlowwa

    Regards from Chile
    Gustavo

  20. #40
    Member MartinezRoe7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santago SCEL
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Hello everyone, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos, before analyzing whether I upload them or not. Your opinion would be very helpful.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8619cc.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	857.6 KB 
ID:	13547
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8514cc.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	663.9 KB 
ID:	13548
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1905cc.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	474.4 KB 
ID:	13549
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1935cc.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	439.1 KB 
ID:	13550
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0358cc.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	515.5 KB 
ID:	13551

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •