Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 111

Thread: Balders - Prescreening required please.

  1. #81
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balders View Post
    Hi could a screener please have a look at these for me thinks in advance
    1Attachment 19109 2Attachment 19110 3Attachment 19111 4Attachment 19112 5Attachment 19113
    All would be rejected for dark, soft, and contrast - except #4 which is also blurry.

  2. #82
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Ok thanks for getting back.

  3. #83
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Hi could a screener please have a look at these again as I have had another go!! 1Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-DLH-RYANAIR-2.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	631.9 KB 
ID:	19158 2Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-FHJ-norwegian-10.10.18.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	633.3 KB 
ID:	19159 3Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GCTS-Air-Transat-10.10.18.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	410.6 KB 
ID:	19160 4Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-VROM-virgin-atlantic-.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	625.9 KB 
ID:	19161 5Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-VXLG-virgin-atlantic.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	658.1 KB 
ID:	19162

  4. #84
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balders View Post
    Hi could a screener please have a look at these again as I have had another go!! 1Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-DLH-RYANAIR-2.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	631.9 KB 
ID:	19158 2Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-FHJ-norwegian-10.10.18.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	633.3 KB 
ID:	19159 3Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GCTS-Air-Transat-10.10.18.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	410.6 KB 
ID:	19160 4Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-VROM-virgin-atlantic-.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	625.9 KB 
ID:	19161 5Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-VXLG-virgin-atlantic.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	658.1 KB 
ID:	19162
    1. soft/blurry, contrast
    2. soft, contrast, color
    3. soft/blurry, contrast
    4. soft, color
    5. contrast, overprocessed

  5. #85
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Ok thanks for your reply.

  6. #86
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Hi could a screener please offer some advice on this rejection for "Part of aircraft cut off"Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B-LRQ-CATHY-PACIFIC-18.11.18.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	631.7 KB 
ID:	19992, would this have been better if I had tightened the crop?
    Also am I correct in thinking that I will have to wait until the rejected pic has past 14 days before re uploading.
    Many thanks in advance.

  7. #87
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    Hi,
    There's too much of the aircraft for a close-up. You can try to crop much closer to the engine but even there i would still be borderline. Main issue I see there is also the very strong sky compression. We can clearly see big pixels there.

    Regards
    Alex

  8. #88
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Ok thats great thanks for the feedback.

  9. #89
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Hi all,
    Could someone please advise if this image would be accepted as a night shot? and any other point would be good. Thanks in advance.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EUPJ-BA-(BEA-RETRO-LIVERY)-29.4.19.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	401.9 KB 
ID:	23951

  10. #90
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balders View Post
    Hi all,
    Could someone please advise if this image would be accepted as a night shot? and any other point would be good. Thanks in advance.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EUPJ-BA-(BEA-RETRO-LIVERY)-29.4.19.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	401.9 KB 
ID:	23951
    No, image is too dark/backlit.

  11. #91
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Thanks for getting back.

  12. #92
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Hi screeners would the crop of this image be ok?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EOA.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	585.0 KB 
ID:	24502

    Thanks in advance

  13. #93
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balders View Post
    Hi screeners would the crop of this image be ok?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EOA.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	585.0 KB 
ID:	24502

    Thanks in advance
    I wouldn't say no immediately, but it is a bit awkward, so probably borderline at best.

  14. #94
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Thanks dlowwa, I will have a look at some of the other shots.

  15. #95
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Hi all
    I had this photo rejected for "Soft and Contrast" issues, after appeal the contrast issue was accepted but the softness issue remained! Click image for larger version. 

Name:	30469_1562790577.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	386.6 KB 
ID:	26503
    I have also attached a Photo of this pictures in camera Histogram and AF Points.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0903.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	472.1 KB 
ID:	26502
    What I would like to know is am I messing up the photos in post processing? Just how much editing needs doing on some of these photos!!
    Many thanks for your help with this.

  16. #96
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balders View Post
    Hi all
    I had this photo rejected for "Soft and Contrast" issues, after appeal the contrast issue was accepted but the softness issue remained! Click image for larger version. 

Name:	30469_1562790577.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	386.6 KB 
ID:	26503
    I have also attached a Photo of this pictures in camera Histogram and AF Points.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0903.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	472.1 KB 
ID:	26502
    What I would like to know is am I messing up the photos in post processing? Just how much editing needs doing on some of these photos!!
    Many thanks for your help with this.
    Just a touch soft imho. Slight sharpening should be enough. Don't think focusing is the issue.

  17. #97
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Thanks for coming back.
    The screener did say in the email a touch sharper would be ok!

    I have another that has been rejected for the same and I will appeal that one as it seems fairly similar.

    Thanks again dlowwa.

  18. #98
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Hi Screeners help needed with this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7490963 The rejection says needs CW rotation, Appeal says CCW rotation!! I don't think it needs any (Fence post have been good enough in the past).
    And I am still not sure about adding more contrast!!
    Many thank for your advice in advance

  19. #99
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balders View Post
    Hi Screeners help needed with this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7490963 The rejection says needs CW rotation, Appeal says CCW rotation!! I don't think it needs any (Fence post have been good enough in the past).
    And I am still not sure about adding more contrast!!
    Many thank for your advice in advance
    I think probably that's a typo on the appeal. CW is definitely what is needed. In the future, better to ask for help in the forum before appealing.

  20. #100
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    I think probably that's a typo on the appeal. CW is definitely what is needed. In the future, better to ask for help in the forum before appealing.
    Ok that's fine thanks for the quick response.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •