Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 141 to 159 of 159

Thread: Majky737 - Editing Advice

  1. #141
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Hello,

    I kindly ask to prescreen photo attached below.

    Thank you
    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZGX_III.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	834.2 KB 
ID:	26081

  2. #142
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I kindly ask to prescreen photo attached below.

    Thank you
    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZGX_III.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	834.2 KB 
ID:	26081
    Borderline contrast, but acceptable for me.

  3. #143
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Borderline contrast, but acceptable for me.
    Thank you. One more photo for prescreening is attached below.

    Thank you.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GKXS.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	730.1 KB 
ID:	26135

  4. #144
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Thank you. One more photo for prescreening is attached below.

    Thank you.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GKXS.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	730.1 KB 
ID:	26135
    Borderline contrast/obstruction.

  5. #145
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Good evening,

    I have received this reject:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7412340

    I adjusted image via curves and I seek for advice, if are issues fixed now (contrast, underexposure, colors). New edit is attached below.

    Thank you

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9H-TJB_II.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	715.6 KB 
ID:	26428

  6. #146
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Good evening,

    I have received this reject:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7412340

    I adjusted image via curves and I seek for advice, if are issues fixed now (contrast, underexposure, colors). New edit is attached below.

    Thank you

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9H-TJB_II.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	715.6 KB 
ID:	26428
    Slight cyan cast, but would be ok for me.

  7. #147
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Hello,

    I want to ask for prescreening of attached photo. As airplane was somehow far, I am affraid that it is soft and there is a compression.

    Thank you

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YL-BBS_II.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	390.0 KB 
ID:	27211

  8. #148
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I want to ask for prescreening of attached photo. As airplane was somehow far, I am affraid that it is soft and there is a compression.

    Thank you

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YL-BBS_II.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	390.0 KB 
ID:	27211
    Yes, aircraft is soft/blurry.

  9. #149
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Hi,

    Is the photo attached below sharp enought, or too soft?

    Thank you for reply.

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OK-BEE_III.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	837.5 KB 
ID:	28305

  10. #150
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    Is the photo attached below sharp enought, or too soft?

    Thank you for reply.

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OK-BEE_III.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	837.5 KB 
ID:	28305
    Soft, but actually maybe a bit blurry.

  11. #151
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Hi,

    is this photo sharp enought?

    Thank you

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-IDM_II.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	756.9 KB 
ID:	28524

    ps: please ignore photo on Thumbnails.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-IDM_II.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	723.4 KB 
ID:	28523  

  12. #152
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    is this photo sharp enought?

    Thank you

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OE-IDM_II.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	756.9 KB 
ID:	28524

    ps: please ignore photo on Thumbnails.
    Borderline soft. Maybe it passes, maybe not. The bit of noise doesn't help as well.

  13. #153
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Thank you Gerardo.

    I have one more question refering to these two recent rejects:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7566484
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7566487

    Do you think that are these photos passable after better edit, or did light conditions killed them definitly?

    Thank you for your opinion.

    Regards
    Marian

  14. #154
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Thank you Gerardo.

    I have one more question refering to these two recent rejects:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7566484
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7566487

    Do you think that are these photos passable after better edit, or did light conditions killed them definitly?

    Thank you for your opinion.

    Regards
    Marian
    In my opinion, they can be improved to an acceptable level by adjusting the curves to brighten up the aircraft without getting a uniform light grey background. That said, not all screeners wiil agree on that, so you will also need a bit of luck.

  15. #155
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    In my opinion, they can be improved to an acceptable level by adjusting the curves to brighten up the aircraft without getting a uniform light grey background. That said, not all screeners wiil agree on that, so you will also need a bit of luck.
    Thank you Gerardo, I understand. I made attempt to adjust contrast using curves, I think both images looks better now:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	I-MJET_II.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	710.9 KB 
ID:	28602
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	32-10_II.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	618.3 KB 
ID:	28603

    However, I take conditions into account. Maybe I will give them a chance later.

    Regards
    Marian

  16. #156
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Hi,

    I have edited photo attached below. My question is: does the tarmac looks too overexposed? I was searchnig for ideal histogram by curves and maybe I added too much highlights.

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N544AR.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	909.8 KB 
ID:	28877

  17. #157
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Beijing, China / College Station, TX, USA
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I have edited photo attached below. My question is: does the tarmac looks too overexposed? I was searchnig for ideal histogram by curves and maybe I added too much highlights.

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N544AR.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	909.8 KB 
ID:	28877
    No, tarmac does not look overexposed. The whole pic looks a bit underexposed overall.

  18. #158
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    148

    Default Contrast

    Hi,

    I want to ask for prescreening of attached photo - especially for contrast. On Histogram, I see a gap on Midtones, but when I look on picture, it looks fine to me (so I am a little unsure about contrast).

    Thank you for your time / opinion.

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-SWRD.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	829.1 KB 
ID:	29198

  19. #159
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I want to ask for prescreening of attached photo - especially for contrast. On Histogram, I see a gap on Midtones, but when I look on picture, it looks fine to me (so I am a little unsure about contrast).

    Thank you for your time / opinion.

    Marian

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-SWRD.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	829.1 KB 
ID:	29198
    Should be ok, think it's just the paint job making it look like that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •