Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lat1918-Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6314211
    Was wondering if this is worth an appeal or get help with where exactly it was too dark or too light. Thank you
    Hey

    Not sure if this is fixable due to the very bright background. I think, this in addition with the sunless fuselage leads mostly to a "too little contrast" rejection.

    Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

    Comment


    • #77
      JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

      Worth an appeal or just edit again?
      Thank you

      Comment


      • #78
        Please disregard last post. I got my question answered. Thank you

        Comment


        • #79
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0225-C-GJWO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	374.3 KB
ID:	1022064
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0116-N107NN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	436.0 KB
ID:	1022065
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0488-N293WN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	458.0 KB
ID:	1022066
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0500-N526AS.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	583.0 KB
ID:	1022067
          Was hoping to have these prescreened thank you

          Comment


          • #80
            I also would like help with finding military aircraft information since I am coming up with no clear information. Thank you

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
              Ricky, how on earth do you expect us to help with such a ranting like yours ...


              The most important part in photography is location and light. You decided to take photos on an overcast day, that is your choice and there is nothing wrong with it. But the photos will lack light, colours and contrast. If you want better photos, wait for a sunny day with more blue sky. That's what the screener replied to you.
              Would like to apologize for the former post. I was a little bit over stressed, did not mean to cause any issues that would make me look bad. Sorry again

              Comment


              • #82
                I was just wondering if I could get the pictures I had posted in the previous post before screened? I understand that some people are busy. Thank you

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
                  I was just wondering if I could get the pictures I had posted in the previous post before screened? I understand that some people are busy. Thank you
                  I'll try one more time with you. The problem is not the rant you posted, it was the fact that despite me telling you the image(s) were correctly rejected, you went and appealed anyway. That is something completely within your rights, but then I have no incentive to offer advice if it's simply going to be ignored. If you choose to ignore the advice given, that's completely your decision, but then don't be surprised if you stop receiving advice.

                  1. ok
                  2-3 probably ok, though the crop is very close on the nose
                  4. contrast

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    I'll try one more time with you. The problem is not the rant you posted, it was the fact that despite me telling you the image(s) were correctly rejected, you went and appealed anyway. That is something completely within your rights, but then I have no incentive to offer advice if it's simply going to be ignored. If you choose to ignore the advice given, that's completely your decision, but then don't be surprised if you stop receiving advice.

                    1. ok
                    2-3 probably ok, though the crop is very close on the nose
                    4. contrast
                    With two and three I feel like the centering is a bit too low, should I go back and fix that as well? Thank you dlowwa

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
                      With two and three I feel like the centering is a bit too low, should I go back and fix that as well? Thank you dlowwa
                      You could move them slightly higher if you wanted, but not by much.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0009-N161SY.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	331.1 KB
ID:	1022133
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0416-N908FJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	685.7 KB
ID:	1022134
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0920-N842MH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	291.1 KB
ID:	1022135
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0110-N805AW.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	707.0 KB
ID:	1022136
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0739-N236AK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	451.4 KB
ID:	1022137
                        Was hoping to have these prescreened. Thank you again

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13468[/ATTACH]
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13469[/ATTACH]
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13470[/ATTACH]
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13471[/ATTACH]
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13472[/ATTACH]
                          Was hoping to have these prescreened. Thank you again
                          1) maybe a tad soft, and that distraction on the left, not a rejection reason but kinda ruins the shot
                          2) borderline cut-off for some screeners maybe but I would vote add
                          3) bordeline contrast
                          4) contrast, difference between sky and plane almost not visible
                          5) should be ok

                          Regards
                          Alex

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0123-N822SR-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	617.7 KB
ID:	1022162
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0196-N427DP-1.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	677.8 KB
ID:	1022163
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0678-N449TT.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	601.4 KB
ID:	1022164
                            Prescreen please. Thank you again

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13500[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13501[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13502[/ATTACH]
                              Prescreen please. Thank you again
                              All would be rejected for soft and overprocessed (editing halos), and the first possibly for manipulation as well for whatever you did to the sky above the tail.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                All would be rejected for soft and overprocessed (editing halos), and the first possibly for manipulation as well for whatever you did to the sky above the tail.
                                The first one I've been having issues with when submitting. Either overexposed, dust spots, or soft. That's probably what you noticed in the first one. I certainly have been having a difficult time with that one. Thank you for your generous help

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X