Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 116

Thread: Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

  1. #41
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Hi,

    I've done some work from previous feedback and would like to check this set. I suspect for the majority of them, the original shot is just not good enough, hence the original problems.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-763-hangar-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	1.62 MB 
ID:	21392Click image for larger version. 

Name:	QR-773-rwy-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	21393Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AA-788-sky-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	511.3 KB 
ID:	21394Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KAL-773-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	527.8 KB 
ID:	21395

    Cheers

  2. #42
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I've done some work from previous feedback and would like to check this set. I suspect for the majority of them, the original shot is just not good enough, hence the original problems.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-763-hangar-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	1.62 MB 
ID:	21392Click image for larger version. 

Name:	QR-773-rwy-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	21393Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AA-788-sky-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	511.3 KB 
ID:	21394Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KAL-773-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	527.8 KB 
ID:	21395

    Cheers
    1. ok
    2. borderline soft
    3. backlit, too far, centering
    4. blurry, dark/contrast, crop/centering

  3. #43
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Thanks very much.

  4. #44
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this set. The last one is an old jpeg rather than an old scan.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RJ-788-sunset-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	641.5 KB 
ID:	21498Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-773-rain-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	608.1 KB 
ID:	21499Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AB-Dash-web-copy-2.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	842.8 KB 
ID:	21500

    Thanks

  5. #45
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this set. The last one is an old jpeg rather than an old scan.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RJ-788-sunset-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	641.5 KB 
ID:	21498Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-773-rain-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	608.1 KB 
ID:	21499Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AB-Dash-web-copy-2.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	842.8 KB 
ID:	21500

    Thanks
    1) OK (don't forget NIGHT SHOT category)
    2) Hmmmmmm, harsh contrast, but I would upload it, if I were you
    3) Looks a bit overdone (slight halos and looks as if you used too much noise reducer or other such filter)

  6. #46
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Thanks Geri.

    I'm very intrigued about number 2 as I pondered about how to get the best out of it and wasn't sure how to avoid contrast issues. I took it about half an hour before number 1 and it was made interesting by the monster of a dark rain cloud behind it.

    Thanks for the thoughts.

  7. #47
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this set:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DL-A333-taxi-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.08 MB 
ID:	21616
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AV-321-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	932.9 KB 
ID:	21617
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	VS-789-takeoff-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	918.7 KB 
ID:	21618
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ET-A388-land-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	565.9 KB 
ID:	21619

    This next one is an older jpeg for a new reg on the database. I loaded it as such, ticking small prop and it was rejected for Categories wrong or missing and Bad info. Any ideas of which other categories need to be ticked? It was taken at Old Hay, UK and as the airfiled does not have an ICAO code I ticked unknown and UK for the country.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	195-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.73 MB 
ID:	21620

    Thanks

  8. #48
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this set:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DL-A333-taxi-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.08 MB 
ID:	21616
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AV-321-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	932.9 KB 
ID:	21617
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	VS-789-takeoff-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	918.7 KB 
ID:	21618
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ET-A388-land-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	565.9 KB 
ID:	21619

    This next one is an older jpeg for a new reg on the database. I loaded it as such, ticking small prop and it was rejected for Categories wrong or missing and Bad info. Any ideas of which other categories need to be ticked? It was taken at Old Hay, UK and as the airfiled does not have an ICAO code I ticked unknown and UK for the country.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	195-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.73 MB 
ID:	21620

    Thanks
    1. borderline color/compression in sky
    2. contrast
    3. very borderline contrast
    4. soft/blurry, contrast
    5. small prop & warbird vintage (because of age) apply. 'Unknown' is not acceptable for location if you know where the photo was taken.

  9. #49
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Thanks very much. Very helpful.

    How do you enter the location if it doesn’t have an ICAO code so it can’t be added to the database?

  10. #50
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks very much. Very helpful.

    How do you enter the location if it doesn’t have an ICAO code so it can’t be added to the database?
    If not already in the DB under a different name, use 'Other Location - xyz'

  11. #51
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Ah, I can see where I went wrong. Thanks very much.

  12. #52
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Hi,

    I'd be grateful for thoughts on this shot.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LX-A333-push-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	21661

    Thanks

  13. #53
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,375

    Default

    It's too dark I'm afraid

    Regards
    Alex

  14. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Thanks Alex. I'll work on that.

    Cheers

  15. #55
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Hi,

    I've made some adjustments to the original one. Is this any better?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LX-A333-push-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	21687

    Also, this one was rejected for being too dark and too much/little contrast. I've worked on it and wanted to see if this is good enough.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-773-rain-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	516.0 KB 
ID:	21688

    Thanks

  16. #56
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I've made some adjustments to the original one. Is this any better?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LX-A333-push-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	21687

    Also, this one was rejected for being too dark and too much/little contrast. I've worked on it and wanted to see if this is good enough.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-773-rain-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	516.0 KB 
ID:	21688

    Thanks
    1. borderline, but would be acceptable for me
    2. still borderline at best

  17. #57
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback.

  18. #58
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Hi,

    I'm trying out a different type of photo so wanted to check the following please.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Swiss-F-5s-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	885.3 KB 
ID:	22025Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Swiss-doubl-F-5s-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1,013.1 KB 
ID:	22027Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Swiss-F-18-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	22028

    Its the first time I've posted a photo with two aircraft so wondering which registration to use or if any specific selections are required.

    Cheers

  19. #59
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm trying out a different type of photo so wanted to check the following please.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Swiss-F-5s-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	885.3 KB 
ID:	22025Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Swiss-doubl-F-5s-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1,013.1 KB 
ID:	22027Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Swiss-F-18-web-copy-3.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	22028

    Its the first time I've posted a photo with two aircraft so wondering which registration to use or if any specific selections are required.

    Cheers
    1. blurry
    2. soft, dark
    3. soft

    Use info for nearest aircraft if you have better quality images.

  20. #60
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Much appreciated.

    Thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •