Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 140

Thread: Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

    Hi,

    I'm new to photography and around here so looking for some advice. My photo was rejected as undersharpened (soft) with too much or too little contrast.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6273487

    Any suggestions on hoe to improve are greatly appreciated.

    Cheers

  2. #2
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm new to photography and around here so looking for some advice. My photo was rejected as undersharpened (soft) with too much or too little contrast.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6273487

    Any suggestions on hoe to improve are greatly appreciated.

    Cheers
    Doesn't seem to soft to me, but the contrast is unnatural - looks overprocessed actually, like too much clarity or shadow/highlight tool. There's an orange tint as well. The quality looks good enough that a good re-edit should make it acceptable.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Thanks for the advice and will work on the picture.

    The light was very interesting that day with a lot of orange flashing around and deeper yellows. It made it all very atmospheric with the snow.

    Cheers

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default Flying.Fonz - prescreening request / editing advice

    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this rejection:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7017550
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SQ-A388-app-web.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	595.7 KB 
ID:	20703

    The rejection notes were:

    Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
    Too much or too little contrast


    The subject of this photo was a damp cold soaked fuselage which gave rise to very unusual and interesting lines, colours and shades at sunset. Its had very little if any post processing and mostly by the use of Levels for contrast purposes.

    Cheers.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this rejection:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7017550
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SQ-A388-app-web.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	595.7 KB 
ID:	20703

    The rejection notes were:

    Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
    Too much or too little contrast


    The subject of this photo was a damp cold soaked fuselage which gave rise to very unusual and interesting lines, colours and shades at sunset. Its had very little if any post processing and mostly by the use of Levels for contrast purposes.

    Cheers.
    contrast too strong. editing halos visible on the tail and fuselage. / rgds

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Thanks

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KQ-788-birds-web.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	601.0 KB 
ID:	20718Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Aegean-A321-misty-land-web.jpg 
Views:	47 
Size:	567.0 KB 
ID:	20719Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-789-line-up-web.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	20720Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SQ-A388-app-web-2.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	531.7 KB 
ID:	20721

    Cheers

  8. #8
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KQ-788-birds-web.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	601.0 KB 
ID:	20718Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Aegean-A321-misty-land-web.jpg 
Views:	47 
Size:	567.0 KB 
ID:	20719Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-789-line-up-web.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	20720Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SQ-A388-app-web-2.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	531.7 KB 
ID:	20721

    Cheers
    1. borderline overprocessed
    2. overprocessed
    3. borderline overprocessed
    4. overprocessed, contrast

    All have editing halos visible to some extent.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Many thanks.

    I've reworked them focusing on the halos and over processing. Grateful for feedback on this set.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Aegean-321-misty-web.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	487.6 KB 
ID:	20738Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MH-329-sunset-app-web.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	376.8 KB 
ID:	20739Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-772-sunset-landing-web.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	405.1 KB 
ID:	20740Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-789-line-up-web.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,006.5 KB 
ID:	20741Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KQ-788-birds-web.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	478.5 KB 
ID:	20742

    Cheers

  10. #10
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Many thanks.

    I've reworked them focusing on the halos and over processing. Grateful for feedback on this set.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Aegean-321-misty-web.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	487.6 KB 
ID:	20738Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MH-329-sunset-app-web.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	376.8 KB 
ID:	20739Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-772-sunset-landing-web.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	405.1 KB 
ID:	20740Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ-789-line-up-web.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,006.5 KB 
ID:	20741Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KQ-788-birds-web.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	478.5 KB 
ID:	20742

    Cheers
    1. borderline overprocessed/soft
    2-3 borderline soft
    4. borderline heat haze
    5. ok

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Much appreciated.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these sunset shots.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-789-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	408.3 KB 
ID:	20790Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PK-772-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	464.1 KB 
ID:	20791Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SL-A333-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	354.2 KB 
ID:	20792Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SQ-A388-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	311.8 KB 
ID:	20793

    Thanks and Happy New Year.

  13. #13
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these sunset shots.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-789-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	408.3 KB 
ID:	20790Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PK-772-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	464.1 KB 
ID:	20791Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SL-A333-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	354.2 KB 
ID:	20792Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SQ-A388-sunset-arr-web.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	311.8 KB 
ID:	20793

    Thanks and Happy New Year.
    1. vignetting
    2. borderline soft
    3. vignetting, contrast, borderline soft
    4. soft

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Many thanks for the advice.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Thanks for the previous help.

    Grateful for advice on this set please.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	China-A333-sunset-arr-web-1920.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	615.3 KB 
ID:	20804Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-744-halloween-land-web-1920.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	1,002.2 KB 
ID:	20805

    Cheers

  16. #16
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks for the previous help.

    Grateful for advice on this set please.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	China-A333-sunset-arr-web-1920.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	615.3 KB 
ID:	20804Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-744-halloween-land-web-1920.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	1,002.2 KB 
ID:	20805

    Cheers
    1. soft in spots (tail, wingtips)
    2. ok

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Cheers.

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Hi,

    I'd be grateful for advice on this set. I'm also aware in one the a/c is not centred but the intent is to include the shadow so I'm using this to understand what is and isn't acceptable.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-744-shadow-landing-web-copy.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	781.9 KB 
ID:	20888Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-A321n-easterly-web.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	869.9 KB 
ID:	20887

    Cheers
    Last edited by Flying.Fonz; 01-05-2019 at 11:15 AM. Reason: Missing photo

  19. #19
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,521

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'd be grateful for advice on this set. I'm also aware in one the a/c is not centred but the intent is to include the shadow so I'm using this to understand what is and isn't acceptable.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-744-shadow-landing-web-copy.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	781.9 KB 
ID:	20888Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BA-A321n-easterly-web.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	869.9 KB 
ID:	20887

    Cheers
    1: a bit too soft, verticals slightly leaning to the left
    2: way too high in the frame.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Thanks Geri and the feedback makes a huge difference.

    Cheers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •