Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Hi,

    Could I have a quick check on this one please.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DL-A333-t_o-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1033357

    Cheers

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
      Hi,

      Could I have a quick check on this one please.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22307[/ATTACH]

      Cheers
      Borderline for contrast.

      Comment


      • #63
        Thanks. Could I check that it is too much contrast please.

        I had this one rejected for too little/much contrast and having sought advice, read up on it and corrected it, I was unsure and believed it was for too much contrast. Pointers for both would be greatly appreciated, make a significant difference to my development and hopefully less hassle for screeners.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	VS-789-takeoff-web-copy-3.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	918.7 KB
ID:	1033367

        Many thanks

        Comment


        • #64
          Virgin, just like Aeroflot or Jet2 are airlines with metallic paint scheme. Those scheme are extremely dull when there's no good sunlight on them which is the case here. Honestly I'm not sure you can make it better than what you already did.
          Would it be my picture, I would keep it for the personal collection

          kind Regards
          Alex

          Comment


          • #65
            Thanks Alex. That is just the type of info I was looking for.

            Cheers
            Andy

            Comment


            • #66
              Hi and thanks for previous feedback which has been extremely useful. With that in mind I've made some adjustments to how I do things and I'd like a check on these two.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DL-A333-t_o-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1033404

              Click image for larger version

Name:	WK-A343-t-o-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1033405

              Cheers

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                Hi and thanks for previous feedback which has been extremely useful. With that in mind I've made some adjustments to how I do things and I'd like a check on these two.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]22365[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]22366[/ATTACH]

                Cheers
                1. borderline color/contrast
                2. contrast, borderline soft

                Both lack contrast due to overcast conditions.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Fab. Thanks.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Hi,

                    I'm looking for advice (not just from screeners but other members too) on a couple of photos that were recently rejected. I can see they're not quite right (not looking to repost them) but I want to understand what can be done to improve photos (aside from taking better ones) when we then observe approved photos that are not to quite the standard usually seen on JP.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-744-Landor-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1033499 (I'm aware its not quite horizontal but easily fixed)


                    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-747-Landor-web-copy.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	985.8 KB
ID:	1033500

                    I'd be interested in your thoughts on these two to upload. I worked on the advice given (frankly, my first attempt was shockingly bad). It may well be that a lower resolution may help.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-744-Landor-web-taxiing-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.45 MB
ID:	1033501

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-744-Landor-taxiing-2-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.28 MB
ID:	1033502

                    As always, grateful for your advice.


                    Cheers

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                      Hi,

                      I'm looking for advice (not just from screeners but other members too) on a couple of photos that were recently rejected. I can see they're not quite right (not looking to repost them) but I want to understand what can be done to improve photos (aside from taking better ones) when we then observe approved photos that are not to quite the standard usually seen on JP.

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22473[/ATTACH] (I'm aware its not quite horizontal but easily fixed)


                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22474[/ATTACH]

                      I'd be interested in your thoughts on these two to upload. I worked on the advice given (frankly, my first attempt was shockingly bad). It may well be that a lower resolution may help.

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22475[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22476[/ATTACH]

                      As always, grateful for your advice.


                      Cheers
                      1. contrast a bit flat, and needs a touch of brightening, but otherwise should be ok
                      2. sky in top of frame above stabilizer significantly darker than the rest. filter used?
                      3-4 slight green cast/flat light. not sure if fixable

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Thanks for the thoughts.

                        I haven't got a filter. I remember distinctly that the sky was different at that moment but no problem looking at it again.

                        Cheers

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Hi,

                          I'm looking for a quick check on these please.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-A319-BEA-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	698.4 KB
ID:	1033601 Can this one still be uploaded as a hot photo even though its been around for a couple of weeks?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	KU-773-landing-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	965.9 KB
ID:	1033602

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	UA-772-landing-web-copy.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	997.5 KB
ID:	1033603

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	TK-773-land-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1033604

                          Cheers

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                            Hi,

                            I'm looking for a quick check on these please.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]22590[/ATTACH] Can this one still be uploaded as a hot photo even though its been around for a couple of weeks?

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]22591[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]22592[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]22593[/ATTACH]

                            Cheers
                            1. not hot
                            2-3 borderline soft
                            4. soft, contrast

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Is 1. ok or does it need further work?

                              Thanks

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                                Is 1. ok or does it need further work?

                                Thanks
                                Maybe a touch soft, but otherwise ok.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X