Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riadh - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Good evening, can you please check this picture? many thanks
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5427_01_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.2 KB
ID:	1021661

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Riadh View Post
      Good evening, can you please check this picture? many thanks
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]12930[/ATTACH]
      As with the rest, would be rejected for overprocessed.

      Comment


      • #18
        Good evening, can you please check these pictures?
        ThanksClick image for larger version

Name:	A7-BAU Qatar 2017DE20 CYUL DSC_2923_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	462.5 KB
ID:	1021668Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FYNS Air Canada Rouge 2017DE20 CYUL DSC_2687_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1021669Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FKCK Air Canada 2017DE20 CYUL DSC_2659.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1021670

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Riadh View Post
          Good evening, can you please check these pictures?
          Thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]12943[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]12944[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]12945[/ATTACH]
          1. overprocessed
          2. borderline oversharpened
          3. ok

          I'd try to sort out your processing issues before posting any more images where the sky is visible, as you're going to continue to be told they're overprocessed until you do.

          Comment


          • #20
            I'll follow your advice after this last one. FYI this is no processed (no crop or sharpenned). I'll take any advice for processing.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2923_01_No process.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	408.9 KB
ID:	1021671

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Riadh View Post
              I'll follow your advice after this last one. FYI this is no processed (no crop or sharpenned). I'll take any advice for processing.[ATTACH=CONFIG]12946[/ATTACH]
              Halos are definitely stronger in the edited version, so it's something you're doing in your workflow.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Halos are definitely stronger in the edited version, so it's something you're doing in your workflow.
                Good evening. I have reviewed completly my workflow (not to overprocess and not getting halos)Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GTVC Air Transat 2018JA01 CYUL DSC_5423_OK_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	622.4 KB
ID:	1021710, what do you think? thanks

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                  Good evening. I have reviewed completly my workflow (not to overprocess and not getting halos)[ATTACH=CONFIG]12988[/ATTACH], what do you think? thanks
                  Halos are less strong, but still present, especially around the tail. Otherwise looks ok.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Halos are less strong, but still present, especially around the tail. Otherwise looks ok.
                    Good evening, I have reviewed again my workflow, can you please check? the second picture is equalized, I think I got rid of halo...Question: Can I upload 16x9 format?Thanks Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GHPX Air Canada 805 2017NO27 CYUL DSC_1842_OK_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	384.3 KB
ID:	1021768Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GHPX Air Canada 805 2017NO27 CYUL DSC_1842_OK_1250_equalized.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	561.8 KB
ID:	1021769

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                      Good evening, I have reviewed again my workflow, can you please check? the second picture is equalized, I think I got rid of halo...Question: Can I upload 16x9 format?Thanks [ATTACH=CONFIG]13056[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]13057[/ATTACH]
                      Looks fine to me. Yes, 16x9 is allowed.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Great thanks. I had a previous rejection for overprocess/bad process, can you please check if it fine now? thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	JY-BAC Royal Jordanian 2017OC30 CYUL DSC_9224_OK_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	809.6 KB
ID:	1021773

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                          Great thanks. I had a previous rejection for overprocess/bad process, can you please check if it fine now? thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]13061[/ATTACH]
                          Don't see any issues with this one either.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Hi dlowwa, can you please check this picture? it is my favorite but the most difficult (to me) to process, thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	C-FFAL Raglan 2017NO30 CYUL DSC_2279_YN_1250_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	552.2 KB
ID:	1021793

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                              Hi dlowwa, can you please check this picture? it is my favorite but the most difficult (to me) to process, thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]13082[/ATTACH]
                              This would be rejected for soft/blurry and strong vignetting.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Good evening, can you please check these pictures (I did process as minimum as needed - removed dust spots and did little sharpe), equalized included, many thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	C-GTVC Air Transat 2018JA01 CYUL DSC_5422_OK_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	468.3 KB
ID:	1021857Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GTVC Air Transat 2018JA01 CYUL DSC_5422_OK_1250_eq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	891.8 KB
ID:	1021858Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HHUB Air caraibes 2017OC18 CYUL DSC_7826_OK_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	451.8 KB
ID:	1021859Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HHUB Air caraibes 2017OC18 CYUL DSC_7826_OK_1250_eq.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	644.1 KB
ID:	1021860

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X