Page 6 of 19 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 379

Thread: Riadh - editing advice

  1. #101
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Hi, can you please pre screen these ones? thank you Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FGXH 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3715_1250.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	648.7 KB 
ID:	14479Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N864AS 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3783_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	456.8 KB 
ID:	14480Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GSQE 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3764_1250.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	482.7 KB 
ID:	14481Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GZNH 2018FE18 CYUL DSC_0158_1250.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	547.2 KB 
ID:	14482

  2. #102
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please pre screen these ones? thank you Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FGXH 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3715_1250.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	648.7 KB 
ID:	14479Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N864AS 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3783_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	456.8 KB 
ID:	14480Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GSQE 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3764_1250.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	482.7 KB 
ID:	14481Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GZNH 2018FE18 CYUL DSC_0158_1250.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	547.2 KB 
ID:	14482
    1. borderline dark/vignetting
    2. blurry, color
    3. borderline dark
    4. contrast/dark

  3. #103
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    what do you think now?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FGXH 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3715_1250_3.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	722.8 KB 
ID:	14495Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GSQE 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3764_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	505.2 KB 
ID:	14496 and added one more, thank you. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JY-BAC 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3805_1250.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	578.0 KB 
ID:	14497

  4. #104
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    what do you think now?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FGXH 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3715_1250_3.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	722.8 KB 
ID:	14495Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GSQE 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3764_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	505.2 KB 
ID:	14496 and added one more, thank you. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JY-BAC 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3805_1250.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	578.0 KB 
ID:	14497
    1. color, contrast, and also soft/blurry (think I missed that last one before)
    2. borderline color
    3. color (red tint)

  5. #105
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. color, contrast, and also soft/blurry (think I missed that last one before)
    2. borderline color
    3. color (red tint)
    OK, I give-up 1 and 2. last try for 3 please ? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JY-BAC 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3805_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	547.7 KB 
ID:	14505
    and does this one have a chance? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N135UP YMX DSC_1409_1250.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	827.7 KB 
ID:	14506

  6. #106
    Member vcruvinel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Brasília, Brazil.
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    OK, I give-up 1 and 2. last try for 3 please ? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JY-BAC 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3805_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	547.7 KB 
ID:	14505
    and does this one have a chance? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N135UP YMX DSC_1409_1250.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	827.7 KB 
ID:	14506
    Not a screener but some points:

    1. The color from the first looks better than the last version
    2. This one needs more contrast.

  7. #107
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    last try for 3 please ? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JY-BAC 2018MR19 CYUL DSC_3805_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	547.7 KB 
ID:	14505
    Color is better. Aircraft looks nearly backlit, so be aware this may or may not be an issue if submitting.

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    and does this one have a chance? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N135UP YMX DSC_1409_1250.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	827.7 KB 
ID:	14506
    No, sorry. Contrast is too poor, and looks like it may be backlit as well. This is not fixable with editing.

  8. #108
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Hi, can you please pre-screen these ones, thank you. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRKI 018MR23 CYUL DSC_4496_1250.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	509.6 KB 
ID:	14536Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GOXW 2018MR23 CYUL DSC_4604_1250.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	863.8 KB 
ID:	14537Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRUZ DSC_4132_1250.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	724.3 KB 
ID:	14538 I guess 3 is too dark may be?!

  9. #109
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please pre-screen these ones, thank you. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRKI 018MR23 CYUL DSC_4496_1250.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	509.6 KB 
ID:	14536Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GOXW 2018MR23 CYUL DSC_4604_1250.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	863.8 KB 
ID:	14537Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRUZ DSC_4132_1250.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	724.3 KB 
ID:	14538 I guess 3 is too dark may be?!
    1: soft, lacks contrast
    2: a bit too soft
    3: a bit too dark

  10. #110
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: soft, lacks contrast
    2: a bit too soft
    3: a bit too dark
    and now? thank youClick image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRKI 018MR23 CYUL DSC_4496_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	697.4 KB 
ID:	14539Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GOXW 2018MR23 CYUL DSC_4604_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	14540Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRUZ DSC_4132_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,003.1 KB 
ID:	14541

  11. #111
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    and now? thank youClick image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRKI 018MR23 CYUL DSC_4496_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	697.4 KB 
ID:	14539Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GOXW 2018MR23 CYUL DSC_4604_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	14540Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FRUZ DSC_4132_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,003.1 KB 
ID:	14541
    None of them really has chances to be accepted.
    1: jagged edges, probably the original is blurry
    2: 50:50 chances
    3: contrast

  12. #112
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Ok, thank you.

  13. #113
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Hi, forgot to turn back raw...are these ones acceptable? (1 - off center OK?)Attachment 14588Attachment 14589Attachment 14590Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GFUR DSC_5652_1250.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	499.8 KB 
ID:	14591

  14. #114
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, forgot to turn back raw...are these ones acceptable? (1 - off center OK?)Attachment 14588Attachment 14589Attachment 14590Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GFUR DSC_5652_1250.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	499.8 KB 
ID:	14591
    1. soft, centering
    2. color, contrast
    3. soft, borderline dark
    4. soft/blurry (tail), dark

  15. #115
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. soft, centering
    2. color, contrast
    3. soft, borderline dark
    4. soft/blurry (tail), dark
    How about 2 now? thank you.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HB-JHK DSC_5592_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	430.8 KB 
ID:	14601
    adding one, thank youClick image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GHPQ 2018MR24 CYUL DSC_4949_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	640.8 KB 
ID:	14602

  16. #116
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    How about 2 now? thank you.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HB-JHK DSC_5592_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	430.8 KB 
ID:	14601
    adding one, thank youClick image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GHPQ 2018MR24 CYUL DSC_4949_1250_2.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	640.8 KB 
ID:	14602
    1. borderline contrast/exposure, but probably acceptable. A bit soft towards the front.
    2. left side/tail area blurry

  17. #117
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Hi, can you please pre screen this one, thank you.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GHQL 2018AL02 CYUL DSC_6962_1250.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	490.3 KB 
ID:	14768

  18. #118
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please pre screen this one, thank you.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-GHQL 2018AL02 CYUL DSC_6962_1250.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	490.3 KB 
ID:	14768
    Again, left side is blurry.

  19. #119
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    229

    Default

    OK, thanks. Question: if the pictures are displayed at 1180x803, should I adjust the sharpness at this size and same upload at this size?

    I have noticed that if I adjust the sharpness at higher than 1180x803 (I usually resize the picture to 1250 and then adjust at actual resolution), it may show blurry (generally speaking, not for the picture above)

  20. #120
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riadh View Post
    OK, thanks. Question: if the pictures are displayed at 1180x803, should I adjust the sharpness at this size and same upload at this size?

    I have noticed that if I adjust the sharpness at higher than 1180x803 (I usually resize the picture to 1250 and then adjust at actual resolution), it may show blurry (generally speaking, not for the picture above)
    This is not a resolution issue, but with your lens/technique. Blurriness as in the photo above will show no matter when you sharpen it, nor what resolution you submit it at.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •