Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 121

Thread: federbear - Editing Advice

  1. #101
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AIUP.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	699.4 KB 
ID:	25134

    Would this picture be rejected as duplicate?

    I have already this approved picture with same reg:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8943647

    Thx in advance!

  2. #102
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AIUP.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	699.4 KB 
ID:	25134

    Would this picture be rejected as duplicate?

    I have already this approved picture with same reg:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8943647

    Thx in advance!
    Would be ok for me since the backgrounds are quite different, but it will be a subjective decision by whoever screens it.

  3. #103
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7361701

    Could you help me regarding this reject? A bit more info would be great.

    Thx in advance!

  4. #104
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7361701

    Could you help me regarding this reject? A bit more info would be great.

    Thx in advance!
    Strong cyan cast.

  5. #105
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Strong cyan cast.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CS-TST.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	612.6 KB 
ID:	25361

    Hi!

    How does it look like now? I added red to the fuselage, but the sky was terrible so I had to compensate it.

    Thx in advance!

  6. #106
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CS-TST.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	612.6 KB 
ID:	25361

    Hi!

    How does it look like now? I added red to the fuselage, but the sky was terrible so I had to compensate it.

    Thx in advance!
    Still slight blue/cyan cast, but maybe passable. I wouldn't suggest adjusting the color in only one part of the frame, lest you end up with a bad processing rejection.

  7. #107
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still slight blue/cyan cast, but maybe passable. I wouldn't suggest adjusting the color in only one part of the frame, lest you end up with a bad processing rejection.
    Thx for your help!

  8. #108
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Hi!

    Could you help me regarding this reject?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7355858

    What does over processed mean in this case? I really do not understand it. It is a picture about a late arrival, the sun is almost down. Otherwise it does not have halo or something else.
    The other reason: Bad Info. I selected all categories that should regard the picture.
    * night
    * cargo
    * special, because of the extra on this plane. XL and the box logo (XL oversize sticker) on its tale and fuselage as other 39 pictures also have.

    Thx in advance!

  9. #109
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    Could you help me regarding this reject?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7355858

    What does over processed mean in this case? I really do not understand it. It is a picture about a late arrival, the sun is almost down. Otherwise it does not have halo or something else.
    Not really sure either. Don't see any editing halos or anything like that.


    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    The other reason: Bad Info. I selected all categories that should regard the picture.
    * night
    * cargo
    * special, because of the extra on this plane. XL and the box logo (XL oversize sticker) on its tale and fuselage as other 39 pictures also have.
    Those are categories, and not related to bad info. It was rejected due to aircraft type and location, though since both of those are visible on the rejected image page, I'm going to assume there was a bug where they didn't show up on the screening page, which sometimes happens.

  10. #110
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Here is the data from the reject:

    Photo Location
    Oslo-Gardermoen - ENGM
    Norway

    Aircraft
    Reg: VP-BIK full info | VP-BIK photos
    Aircraft: Boeing 747-46NERF
    Airline: Air Bridge Cargo

    From FR24:
    04 Jun 2019 Leipzig (LEJ) Oslo (OSL) RU293 1:29 — 18:34 —
    Landed 21:03

    Should I appeal?

  11. #111
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Here is the data from the reject:

    Photo Location
    Oslo-Gardermoen - ENGM
    Norway

    Aircraft
    Reg: VP-BIK full info | VP-BIK photos
    Aircraft: Boeing 747-46NERF
    Airline: Air Bridge Cargo

    From FR24:
    04 Jun 2019 Leipzig (LEJ) Oslo (OSL) RU293 1:29 — 18:34 —
    Landed 21:03

    Should I appeal?
    Please read my comments again. The correct info IS visible on the rejected image page, which means the bad info rejection was likely due to a bug at the time of screening, not because it was incorrect. That can certainly be appealed. The overprocessed part, I will leave that up to you whether it's worth making an appeal.

  12. #112
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4X-ICD.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	553.5 KB 
ID:	25735

    Hi!

    Could you check this picture as pre-screening?

    Thx in advance!

  13. #113
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4X-ICD.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	553.5 KB 
ID:	25735

    Hi!

    Could you check this picture as pre-screening?

    Thx in advance!
    Likely a color rejection due to the magenta color cast.

  14. #114
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4X-ICD.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	551.0 KB 
ID:	25755

    How does it look like now? I think the belly made it more difficult finding the correct colors, because it reflects grass.

  15. #115
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4X-ICD.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	551.0 KB 
ID:	25755

    How does it look like now? I think the belly made it more difficult finding the correct colors, because it reflects grass.
    A bit better I suppose, but it's more the sky/clouds I'd be looking at in terms of color.

  16. #116
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4X-ICD.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	552.9 KB 
ID:	25818

    I edited it again from the raw file. How does it look like?

  17. #117
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4X-ICD.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	552.9 KB 
ID:	25818

    I edited it again from the raw file. How does it look like?
    Would be acceptable for me.

  18. #118
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HL8212.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	762.0 KB 
ID:	25900

    Hi!

    Please check this picture. It is a late departure, and I am unsure that it is acceptable or not.

    Thx in advance!

  19. #119
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HL8212.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	762.0 KB 
ID:	25900

    Hi!

    Please check this picture. It is a late departure, and I am unsure that it is acceptable or not.

    Thx in advance!
    Borderline at best for dark/contrast.

  20. #120
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    ENGM
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HL8212.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	921.5 KB 
ID:	25932

    I added more exposure. How does it look like?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •