Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: paulk - editing advice

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default paulk - editing advice

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	620.1 KB 
ID:	13683Hi, could someone give me a feedback on this picture? Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	620.1 KB 
ID:	13683Hi, could someone give me a feedback on this picture? Thanks in advance.
    A bit soft and low contrast, but otherwise no major issues.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default Paul Kalbitz editing advice

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3554.jpg 
Views:	140 
Size:	468.4 KB 
ID:	15585Dear JP Screeners,
    does a photo with a person whose face has been blurred have a chance to be accepted? And is it allowd to digitally remove clearly visible persons from a picture? (if they're not obstructing the view of plane)
    Thanks

  4. #4
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3554.jpg 
Views:	140 
Size:	468.4 KB 
ID:	15585Dear JP Screeners,
    does a photo with a person whose face has been blurred have a chance to be accepted? And is it allowd to digitally remove clearly visible persons from a picture? (if they're not obstructing the view of plane)
    Thanks
    No, it is not allowed. This would be rejected for manipulation.

  5. #5
    JetPhotos.Net Crew Julian S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    near EDFH, Germany
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3554.jpg 
Views:	140 
Size:	468.4 KB 
ID:	15585Dear JP Screeners,
    does a photo with a person whose face has been blurred have a chance to be accepted? And is it allowd to digitally remove clearly visible persons from a picture? (if they're not obstructing the view of plane)
    Thanks
    Hi.

    Both actions would be rejected as it is digital manipulation what we do not accept. Maybe you can crop closer to the tail to make it acceptable.

    Hope this helps. Have a nice evening and start in to the new week!
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Thanks. Have a nice evening too. Just one follow-up question? Could it be acceptable with the person not blurred out?

  7. #7
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Thanks. Have a nice evening too. Just one follow-up question? Could it be acceptable with the person not blurred out?
    Unfortunately identifiable faces are not allowed, unless it is obvious consent has been given (i.e. pilots in the cockpit, etc..)

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    But for example the person similiar to e.g. the guy with the white shirt and the hat would already count as unidentifiable?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8942544

  9. #9
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    But for example the person similiar to e.g. the guy with the white shirt and the hat would already count as unidentifiable?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8942544
    Borderline in this case, as you could argue that the face(s) are not quite identifiable. Moving forward (i.e. with new privacy laws, especially in Europe where JP/FR24 are based), we will likely be more strict in such cases.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Yep, especially in Germany private photographers have no legal certainty when GDPR comes into force. I guess I'll just keep such pictures for myself.
    Thanks again for answering all my questions!

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9184.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	348.3 KB 
ID:	15786
    Hi, I've got another question.
    Is a photo with an angle of view and aspect ratio (9:16) like in the attached image a possible JP candidate?

  12. #12
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9184.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	348.3 KB 
ID:	15786
    Hi, I've got another question.
    Is a photo with an angle of view and aspect ratio (9:16) like in the attached image a possible JP candidate?
    You could certainly try. It might not please everyone, but I don't see anything that would immediately preclude it from being accepted.

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Thanks, I'll give it a try

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Do the Flightradar hot photo rules also apply to physical changes in an aircrafts look (e.g. missing engines or disassembled parts of the aircraft during maintenance)?

  15. #15
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Do the Flightradar hot photo rules also apply to physical changes in an aircrafts look (e.g. missing engines or disassembled parts of the aircraft during maintenance)?
    no

  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hi again,
    I'd like to upload this photo:Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8568.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	745.3 KB 
ID:	17389
    But I'm unsure about what to select when uploading. Could I select Airport - Ramp?

  17. #17
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Hi again,
    I'd like to upload this photo:Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8568.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	745.3 KB 
ID:	17389
    But I'm unsure about what to select when uploading. Could I select Airport - Ramp?
    No, you should upload with info for the Antonov. That is not a guarantee, however, that the motive will be acceptable.

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Thanks a lot, I'll try it!

  19. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Well, that was a fail

  20. #20
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    pic looks unbalanced with a lot of empty space on the top right part of pic, that's why it got rejected.

    regards
    Alex

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •