Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: paulk - editing advice

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hi screeners,
    just wanted to ask if this one is aceptable and if it already falls in the Night Shot category.
    Thanks a lot.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9012.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	865.3 KB 
ID:	18521

  2. #22
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Hi screeners,
    just wanted to ask if this one is aceptable and if it already falls in the Night Shot category.
    Thanks a lot.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9012.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	865.3 KB 
ID:	18521
    Borderline for soft; yes nightshot.

  3. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hi again,
    I need some help finding the Serial No of a Royal Australian Navy MH-60R. The Reg ist N48-010.
    I hope someone can tell me.
    Cheers
    Paul

  4. #24
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Hi again,
    I need some help finding the Serial No of a Royal Australian Navy MH-60R. The Reg ist N48-010.
    I hope someone can tell me.
    Cheers
    Paul
    If it's not available on scramble.nl, just leave a note saying so, and it should be acceptable.

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hello again,
    I uploaded my most recent photo with wrong date by accident. Photo is https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9122265, Date should be 03 Nov 2018.
    Would be nice if someone could change it
    Thanks!

  6. #26
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2018.02.17, MUC, 73-1676, Boeing E-4B (747-200), US Air Force (2).jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	823.4 KB 
ID:	19879
    Hi screeners,
    could such a picture which was taken during heavy snowfall have a chance of being accepted? Or would it get rejected for noise/contrast/overprocessed/...?

  7. #27
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2018.02.17, MUC, 73-1676, Boeing E-4B (747-200), US Air Force (2).jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	823.4 KB 
ID:	19879
    Hi screeners,
    could such a picture which was taken during heavy snowfall have a chance of being accepted? Or would it get rejected for noise/contrast/overprocessed/...?
    This would be rejected for contrast, soft, and obstruction.

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hi again,
    I took a couple of pictures today with the sun being directly in front of the aircraft. I want to know if this picture/these lighting conditions: Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1101.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	693.4 KB 
ID:	19991 is/are acceptable or already too "backlit".
    Thanks in advance

  9. #29
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Hi again,
    I took a couple of pictures today with the sun being directly in front of the aircraft. I want to know if this picture/these lighting conditions: Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1101.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	693.4 KB 
ID:	19991 is/are acceptable or already too "backlit".
    Thanks in advance
    For me, just enough of the aircraft is getting direct light that it would be ok, but can't guarantee everyone else would agree.

  10. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Thanks, I'll give it a try.

  11. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hey guys,
    can someone tell me which category I am missing here?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7140059
    Thanks!

  12. #32
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Hey guys,
    can someone tell me which category I am missing here?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7140059
    Thanks!
    This should be Warbird and Cargo.

  13. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Thanks, it got accepted with the categories selected.
    Do I have to check "Cargo" for HARS' Super Connie as well?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7133576

  14. #34
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Thanks, it got accepted with the categories selected.
    Do I have to check "Cargo" for HARS' Super Connie as well?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7133576
    Warbird/Vintage applies.

  15. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hi screeners,
    could you please pescreen this picture?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2650.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	788.9 KB 
ID:	24279

  16. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Nobody?

  17. #37
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Nobody?
    You do realize we're here in our free time offering advice, and that there are other things in life (family, work, sleep) that also require time? It doesn't really look good if you are demanding a response only a few hours after posting your request.

  18. #38
    Member MarkLawrence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    232

    Default

    While I am not a screener, I would suggest that the horizon is a little off and could do with some CCW rotation. May also want to wait for a screener as well though.

  19. #39
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Sorry, I just thought the post might not show up in the "inbox" anymore, since some spam was deleted in this thread shortly after posted and because of the usual response time here which is pretty quick. I didn't wanted to be rude I just wanted the "push" the thread. Sorry about that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •