Page 15 of 16 FirstFirst ... 513141516 LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 304

Thread: Enzo Gattullo Pre Screen/Editing Advice

  1. #281
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Thank you.
    The 3th is acceble I suppose.

  2. #282
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    Thank you.
    The 3th is acceble I suppose.
    Hmmm... missed that one somehow.

    3. centering, contrast

  3. #283
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default


  4. #284
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    These days I will take advantage of your patience more than usual. I hope you will forgive me.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0911.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	478.6 KB 
ID:	25024

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0889.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	705.4 KB 
ID:	25025

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0895.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	505.3 KB 
ID:	25026

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0878.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	469.4 KB 
ID:	25027

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0875.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	488.4 KB 
ID:	25028

  5. #285
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    These days I will take advantage of your patience more than usual. I hope you will forgive me.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0911.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	478.6 KB 
ID:	25024

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0889.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	705.4 KB 
ID:	25025

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0895.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	505.3 KB 
ID:	25026

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0878.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	469.4 KB 
ID:	25027

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0875.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	488.4 KB 
ID:	25028
    1. overprocessed, borderline contrast
    2-5 contrast. probably not fixable.

  6. #286
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    thank you

  7. #287
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    an advice

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0705.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	479.9 KB 
ID:	25111

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0819.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	545.1 KB 
ID:	25112

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0821.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	455.8 KB 
ID:	25113

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0904.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	509.1 KB 
ID:	25114

  8. #288
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Please an advice
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0982.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	505.6 KB 
ID:	25266

  9. #289
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    Please an advice
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0982.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	505.6 KB 
ID:	25266
    If possible, choose better weather conditions in which to shoot if you plan on uploading your images here.

  10. #290
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Ty.
    Unfortunately it is not my airport and I was there for a spotting session. I will try to select the best material.

  11. #291
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Hi
    what do you think about this?
    Is it Airport overview?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1229.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	857.8 KB 
ID:	25453

  12. #292
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    Hi
    what do you think about this?
    Is it Airport overview?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1229.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	857.8 KB 
ID:	25453
    No direct light on the terminal, poor overall contrast

    Regards
    Alex

  13. #293
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Good morning. Far be it from me to want to argue over the decisions of the screener, I ask this question in order to understand and better choose the photos to upload to JP.
    I received a rejection for this
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7345695
    I took care to compare it with the photos of the same aircraft and, frankly, I don't understand the reason for rejection for too much or too little contrast not seeing any substantial difference

    Moreover for this rejection also there is underexposed
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7333484
    Last edited by dlowwa; 06-17-2019 at 05:55 AM. Reason: Edited to remove link to other photographers' images.

  14. #294
    Member VH-ROB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    Good morning. Far be it from me to want to argue over the decisions of the screener, I ask this question in order to understand and better choose the photos to upload to JP.
    I received a rejection for this
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7345695
    I took care to compare it with the photos of the same aircraft and, frankly, I don't understand the reason for rejection for too much or too little contrast not seeing any substantial difference
    I'm not a screener, but there's definitely too much contrast on that one.
    Last edited by dlowwa; 06-17-2019 at 05:56 AM. Reason: Edited to remove link to other photographers' images.

  15. #295
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    Good morning. Far be it from me to want to argue over the decisions of the screener, I ask this question in order to understand and better choose the photos to upload to JP.
    I received a rejection for this
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7345695
    I took care to compare it with the photos of the same aircraft and, frankly, I don't understand the reason for rejection for too much or too little contrast not seeing any substantial difference

    Moreover for this rejection also there is underexposed
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7333484
    As with appeals, we ask that you not bring other photographers into the discussion. We are discussing your images, taken at different times, locations, and conditions than others.

    The latter there is the key. Your images were obviously taken in very flat light, and you have attempted to boost the contrast to compensate. No surprise then that such rejections would result.

  16. #296
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    thank you

  17. #297
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default Visible editing halos.

    Hi guys
    Yesterday I received this rejection.
    Having used the usual post production settings, I am unable to understand where I went wrong. Thanks to those who want to help me.
    P.. Another shot of the same plane was accepted.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7377596
    Excuse my bad English

  18. #298
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Hi
    is it accetable?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG-3039.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	397.4 KB 
ID:	25571

  19. #299
    Member Majky737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    LZIB/BTS
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mahagonny View Post
    Hi guys
    Yesterday I received this rejection.
    Having used the usual post production settings, I am unable to understand where I went wrong. Thanks to those who want to help me.
    P.Š. Another shot of the same plane was accepted.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7377596
    Excuse my bad English
    Hi,

    there are some halos around the aircraft - they can be spotted easily after using "Check for dustspot" function. Are these halos on original picture (output from camera) too, or do you see them just after processing?

  20. #300
    Member mahagonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Bari
    Posts
    400

    Default

    I realized that the RAW also suffers from the problem. So I have to understand what happened having done f10 diaphragm.
    Thanks for reply

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •