Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Holm - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hello Holm,

    I'm not screener but I can bring you my experience.

    In my opinion:

    1 Heat distorsion
    2 soft, can be overexposed and a little low
    3 seems good to me
    4 soft

    See you soon

    Olivier

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Holm View Post
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15657[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15655[/ATTACH]

      Thank you!

      EDIT: Deleted Picture 1&4. There were problems with heat-haze and picture 4 was soft as Olivier said, so I'm only interested in a feedback for the two attached pictures.
      1. color (slight yellow/orange cast)
      2. dirty

      Comment


      • #18


        Thanks a lot

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Holm View Post
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15697[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15698[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15699[/ATTACH]

          Thanks a lot
          Hello Holm,

          I remind you that I am not screener

          1 soft

          2 blurry and soft

          3 seems to me ok attention to the dust

          Olivier

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Holm View Post
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15697[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15698[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15699[/ATTACH]

            Thanks a lot
            1. contrast (too weak). not soft.
            2. also contrast. not blurry
            3. ok

            Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
            attention to the dust
            Where is the dust?

            Comment


            • #21
              Thanks, dlowwa.



              Increased the contrast - are they acceptable now?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Holm View Post
                Thanks, dlowwa.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15700[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15701[/ATTACH]

                Increased the contrast - are they acceptable now?
                Contrast better on the first, but I would definitely brighten it before submitting. Second still pretty borderline - you could try another edit, but not sure it would help.

                Comment


                • #23


                  Thanks!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Holm View Post
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15775[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15776[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15777[/ATTACH]

                    Thanks!
                    All borderline for soft/overprocessed. Very light halos visible - not bad enough for a rejection from me, but can't speak for everyone else.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hi,

                      I would be pleased about a feedback regarding to the attached pic:



                      If it looks acceptable, which category (or categories) do I have to add? Is it only the wing view categoriy or also the airport overview category? Thanks for your effort in advance!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Holm View Post
                        Hi,

                        I would be pleased about a feedback regarding to the attached pic:

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16251[/ATTACH]

                        If it looks acceptable, which category (or categories) do I have to add? Is it only the wing view categoriy or also the airport overview category? Thanks for your effort in advance!
                        Wing View only, but with all the reflections visible, it's a moot point since it would be a guaranteed rejection.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Thanks, dlowwa.



                          Pre-screening for this also would be very nice.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Holm View Post
                            Thanks, dlowwa.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16256[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16257[/ATTACH]

                            Pre-screening for this also would be very nice.
                            Both too small to be uploaded.

                            Please check the upload page for minimum requirements.
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Oh, sorry - bad mistake.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hello,

                                both seem ok.

                                maybe the first one would be soft

                                atteds the opinion of a screener

                                Olivier

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X