Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

nik-pilgrim - rejection help/editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    and this picture will be accepted?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7424_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	538.3 KB
ID:	1028211

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
      and this picture will be accepted?
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16048[/ATTACH]
      Nik, IMHO it will be rejected for backlit.

      Better wait comments from the screeners as well.

      Regards,

      Vinicius

      Comment


      • #93
        backlit indeed. just look at the tail, if it's in its own shadow, then it's backlit

        Comment


        • #94
          the picture is made in kontrovy light therefore the tail and will be in a shadow. Your recommendations to this picture what - the picture won't be accepted to remove shadows on a tail or unambiguously?

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
            and this picture will be accepted?
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16048[/ATTACH]
            No, it will not be accepted because the photo is backlit. For more explanations, see above.
            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

            Comment


            • #96
              and this picture will be accepted?
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7013_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	542.0 KB
ID:	1028285
              +
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6183_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	483.5 KB
ID:	1028286
              +
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2468_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	496.3 KB
ID:	1028287

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
                and this picture will be accepted?
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16129[/ATTACH]
                +
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16130[/ATTACH]
                +
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16131[/ATTACH]
                No, because:

                1. heat haze
                2. color, horizon, dark
                3. soft, dark

                Comment


                • #98
                  and if to apply small completion to these pictures, they will be accepted?
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2468_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.0 KB
ID:	1028288
                  +
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7013_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	578.6 KB
ID:	1028289

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
                    and if to apply small completion to these pictures, they will be accepted?
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16132[/ATTACH]
                    +
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16133[/ATTACH]
                    1. better. some dust spots you might also want to take care of
                    2. heat haze still visible. can't really edit that away

                    Comment


                    • I have removed spots of dust, but here the haze unfortunately is present at a background, such weather at us...

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
                        I have removed spots of dust, but here the haze unfortunately is present at a background, such weather at us...
                        Background haze is not an issue. Heat haze on the aircraft is.

                        Comment


                        • I have understood what you speak about - the haze is our trouble, very seldom happens when the picture without it turns out. I will try to place a photo with this plane - the picture can and it will be accepted.
                          And what tell concerning this picture?
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2238_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	428.1 KB
ID:	1028308
                          +
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4021_rs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	502.0 KB
ID:	1028309

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
                            I have understood what you speak about - the haze is our trouble, very seldom happens when the picture without it turns out. I will try to place a photo with this plane - the picture can and it will be accepted.
                            And what tell concerning this picture?
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16153[/ATTACH]
                            +
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16154[/ATTACH]
                            1. borderline overprocessed (editing halos)
                            2. contrast/poor light

                            Comment


                            • I find it difficult to understand your explanation according to the first picture, it is possible a little in more detail. Just for understanding it is necessary to use the translator

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
                                I find it difficult to understand your explanation according to the first picture, it is possible a little in more detail. Just for understanding it is necessary to use the translator
                                Nik,

                                When you change the shadows, highlights or clarity during your editing workflow a thing called "halos" will appear in your image. Basically is a white/black smooth that can be visible in the original and equalized photo.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	nik.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	925.5 KB
ID:	1028328

                                See around the fuselage and you can see some halos. When this appear the photo probably will got a "overprocessed" rejection.

                                Tell me if its clear now!

                                Regards,

                                Vinicius

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X